Court : Karnataka
..... muni raju r/a no.32, eshwar temple road ramohalli, kengeri hobli bangalore south taluk bangalore - 560 074. 3 . sri. m.k. ayyappa commissioner, transport department, transport building, shanti nagar bangalore 560027. 4 . jagadeesh thahasildhar bangalore south taluk aged about45years bangalore 560 009. 10 5 . shivanna rtd. deputy thahsildar aged about61years bangalore ..... that cannot be lightly interfered with. the unconstitutionality must be plainly and clearly established before an enactment is declared as void. the same approach holds good while ascertaining the intent and purpose of an enactment or its scope and application. now, the result of the impugned judgment is that the amending ..... evaluating the evidence. primafacie opinion formed by the special court for taking cognizance of the offence cannot be found fault with. we do not find any good ground to entertain the petition and hence, writ petition stands dismissed. re: w.p.no.1348/2018 164. on a complaint filed by second respondent .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... muni raju r/a no.32, eshwar temple road ramohalli, kengeri hobli bangalore south taluk bangalore - 560 074. 3 . sri. m.k. ayyappa commissioner, transport department, transport building, shanti nagar bangalore 560027. 4 . jagadeesh thahasildhar bangalore south taluk aged about45years bangalore 560 009. 10 5 . shivanna rtd. deputy thahsildar aged about61years bangalore ..... that cannot be lightly interfered with. the unconstitutionality must be plainly and clearly established before an enactment is declared as void. the same approach holds good while ascertaining the intent and purpose of an enactment or its scope and application. now, the result of the impugned judgment is that the amending ..... evaluating the evidence. primafacie opinion formed by the special court for taking cognizance of the offence cannot be found fault with. we do not find any good ground to entertain the petition and hence, writ petition stands dismissed. re: w.p.no.1348/2018 164. on a complaint filed by second respondent .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... muni raju r/a no.32, eshwar temple road ramohalli, kengeri hobli bangalore south taluk bangalore - 560 074. 3 . sri. m.k. ayyappa commissioner, transport department, transport building, shanti nagar bangalore 560027. 4 . jagadeesh thahasildhar bangalore south taluk aged about45years bangalore 560 009. 10 5 . shivanna rtd. deputy thahsildar aged about61years bangalore ..... that cannot be lightly interfered with. the unconstitutionality must be plainly and clearly established before an enactment is declared as void. the same approach holds good while ascertaining the intent and purpose of an enactment or its scope and application. now, the result of the impugned judgment is that the amending ..... evaluating the evidence. primafacie opinion formed by the special court for taking cognizance of the offence cannot be found fault with. we do not find any good ground to entertain the petition and hence, writ petition stands dismissed. re: w.p.no.1348/2018 164. on a complaint filed by second respondent .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... muni raju r/a no.32, eshwar temple road ramohalli, kengeri hobli bangalore south taluk bangalore - 560 074. 3 . sri. m.k. ayyappa commissioner, transport department, transport building, shanti nagar bangalore 560027. 4 . jagadeesh thahasildhar bangalore south taluk aged about45years bangalore 560 009. 10 5 . shivanna rtd. deputy thahsildar aged about61years bangalore ..... that cannot be lightly interfered with. the unconstitutionality must be plainly and clearly established before an enactment is declared as void. the same approach holds good while ascertaining the intent and purpose of an enactment or its scope and application. now, the result of the impugned judgment is that the amending ..... evaluating the evidence. primafacie opinion formed by the special court for taking cognizance of the offence cannot be found fault with. we do not find any good ground to entertain the petition and hence, writ petition stands dismissed. re: w.p.no.1348/2018 164. on a complaint filed by second respondent .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... muni raju r/a no.32, eshwar temple road ramohalli, kengeri hobli bangalore south taluk bangalore - 560 074. 3 . sri. m.k. ayyappa commissioner, transport department, transport building, shanti nagar bangalore 560027. 4 . jagadeesh thahasildhar bangalore south taluk aged about45years bangalore 560 009. 10 5 . shivanna rtd. deputy thahsildar aged about61years bangalore ..... that cannot be lightly interfered with. the unconstitutionality must be plainly and clearly established before an enactment is declared as void. the same approach holds good while ascertaining the intent and purpose of an enactment or its scope and application. now, the result of the impugned judgment is that the amending ..... evaluating the evidence. primafacie opinion formed by the special court for taking cognizance of the offence cannot be found fault with. we do not find any good ground to entertain the petition and hence, writ petition stands dismissed. re: w.p.no.1348/2018 164. on a complaint filed by second respondent .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... muni raju r/a no.32, eshwar temple road ramohalli, kengeri hobli bangalore south taluk bangalore - 560 074. 3 . sri. m.k. ayyappa commissioner, transport department, transport building, shanti nagar bangalore 560027. 4 . jagadeesh thahasildhar bangalore south taluk aged about45years bangalore 560 009. 10 5 . shivanna rtd. deputy thahsildar aged about61years bangalore ..... that cannot be lightly interfered with. the unconstitutionality must be plainly and clearly established before an enactment is declared as void. the same approach holds good while ascertaining the intent and purpose of an enactment or its scope and application. now, the result of the impugned judgment is that the amending ..... evaluating the evidence. primafacie opinion formed by the special court for taking cognizance of the offence cannot be found fault with. we do not find any good ground to entertain the petition and hence, writ petition stands dismissed. re: w.p.no.1348/2018 164. on a complaint filed by second respondent .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... muni raju r/a no.32, eshwar temple road ramohalli, kengeri hobli bangalore south taluk bangalore - 560 074. 3 . sri. m.k. ayyappa commissioner, transport department, transport building, shanti nagar bangalore 560027. 4 . jagadeesh thahasildhar bangalore south taluk aged about45years bangalore 560 009. 10 5 . shivanna rtd. deputy thahsildar aged about61years bangalore ..... that cannot be lightly interfered with. the unconstitutionality must be plainly and clearly established before an enactment is declared as void. the same approach holds good while ascertaining the intent and purpose of an enactment or its scope and application. now, the result of the impugned judgment is that the amending ..... evaluating the evidence. primafacie opinion formed by the special court for taking cognizance of the offence cannot be found fault with. we do not find any good ground to entertain the petition and hence, writ petition stands dismissed. re: w.p.no.1348/2018 164. on a complaint filed by second respondent .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... muni raju r/a no.32, eshwar temple road ramohalli, kengeri hobli bangalore south taluk bangalore - 560 074. 3 . sri. m.k. ayyappa commissioner, transport department, transport building, shanti nagar bangalore 560027. 4 . jagadeesh thahasildhar bangalore south taluk aged about45years bangalore 560 009. 10 5 . shivanna rtd. deputy thahsildar aged about61years bangalore ..... that cannot be lightly interfered with. the unconstitutionality must be plainly and clearly established before an enactment is declared as void. the same approach holds good while ascertaining the intent and purpose of an enactment or its scope and application. now, the result of the impugned judgment is that the amending ..... evaluating the evidence. primafacie opinion formed by the special court for taking cognizance of the offence cannot be found fault with. we do not find any good ground to entertain the petition and hence, writ petition stands dismissed. re: w.p.no.1348/2018 164. on a complaint filed by second respondent .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... muni raju r/a no.32, eshwar temple road ramohalli, kengeri hobli bangalore south taluk bangalore - 560 074. 3 . sri. m.k. ayyappa commissioner, transport department, transport building, shanti nagar bangalore 560027. 4 . jagadeesh thahasildhar bangalore south taluk aged about45years bangalore 560 009. 10 5 . shivanna rtd. deputy thahsildar aged about61years bangalore ..... that cannot be lightly interfered with. the unconstitutionality must be plainly and clearly established before an enactment is declared as void. the same approach holds good while ascertaining the intent and purpose of an enactment or its scope and application. now, the result of the impugned judgment is that the amending ..... evaluating the evidence. primafacie opinion formed by the special court for taking cognizance of the offence cannot be found fault with. we do not find any good ground to entertain the petition and hence, writ petition stands dismissed. re: w.p.no.1348/2018 164. on a complaint filed by second respondent .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... muni raju r/a no.32, eshwar temple road ramohalli, kengeri hobli bangalore south taluk bangalore - 560 074. 3 . sri. m.k. ayyappa commissioner, transport department, transport building, shanti nagar bangalore 560027. 4 . jagadeesh thahasildhar bangalore south taluk aged about45years bangalore 560 009. 10 5 . shivanna rtd. deputy thahsildar aged about61years bangalore ..... that cannot be lightly interfered with. the unconstitutionality must be plainly and clearly established before an enactment is declared as void. the same approach holds good while ascertaining the intent and purpose of an enactment or its scope and application. now, the result of the impugned judgment is that the amending ..... evaluating the evidence. primafacie opinion formed by the special court for taking cognizance of the offence cannot be found fault with. we do not find any good ground to entertain the petition and hence, writ petition stands dismissed. re: w.p.no.1348/2018 164. on a complaint filed by second respondent .....
Tag this Judgment!