Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: multimodal transportation of goods act 1993 chapter 1 preliminary Court: karnataka Page 2 of about 293 results (0.180 seconds)

Dec 03 2015 (HC)

National Mineral Development Corporation Limited, rep. by its Regional ...

Court : Karnataka

..... assuming that the state power of taxation extends to such transactions. also, in mmtc of india limited, it has been held that delivering goods at a port within the state to a foreign buyer for transportation out of india under a pre-existing contract does not amount to resale in the state rather, it would be a sale in the ..... course of export of goods, by the hon'ble supreme court while considering section 5 and section 2(g) of orissa sales tax act, 1947. ( ..... and fee is available to the state so long as it does not interfere with the regulation-the power assumed and occupied by the union. reference was made to automobile transport (rajasthan) ltd. vs. state of rajasthan [air 1962 sc 1406], which arose in the context of state imposing regulatory restrictions on free trade, commerce and intercourse guaranteed under .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 10 2016 (HC)

Smt K M Chikkathayamma Vs. The State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... resettlement package for land owners including subsistence allowance, jobs, house, one acre of land in cases of irrigation projects, transportation allowance and resettlement allowance is proposed.15. comprehensive rehabilitation and resettlement package for livelihood losers including subsistence 114 allowance, jobs, house, transportation allowance and resettlement allowance is proposed. 1 6. special provisions for scheduled castes and the scheduled tribes have been envisaged .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 10 2018 (HC)

Sri Samsthana Mahabaleshwara Devaru Vs. Secretary

Court : Karnataka

..... nazir ahmed vs. king emperor [(1936) l.r. 63 i.a. 372].. the hon ble apex court too, has adopted this maxim [vide: parbhani transport co-operative society ltd. vs. the regional transport authority, aurangabad & others [(1960) (3) s.c.r. 177: air1960sc801. this rule says that an expressly laid down a mode of doing something ..... authority concerned.178. moreover, if discretionary power has been exercised for an unauthorized purpose, it would not be really material whether the exercise of power was in good faith or in bad faith. padfield vs. minister of agriculture & fisheries [(1968)1 all er694 is a locus classicus on the concept of improper purpose in ..... are not abused and/or exercised in frustration or derogation of the constitution or the relevant statutes. these are all matters of public interest. thus, constitutional and good governance is a matter of public interest, vide vineet narain vs. union of india. also, ventilation of grievances related to quality of governance are also facets of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 25 2019 (HC)

The Deputy Commissioner And Vs. M/S S v Global Mill Limited

Court : Karnataka

..... party or is known by him either actually or constructively. the said expression cannot be construed in a literal or mechanical way.41. reference could also be made to transport commissioner vs. nand singh, [(1979) 4 scc19, wherein a similar question in the context of filing of an appeal under section 15 of the u.p. ..... have more of cruelty than justice in them, (2) that a defendant might have lost the evidence to disprove a stale claim, and (3) that persons with good causes of actions should pursue them with reasonable diligence. an unlimited limitation would lead to a sense of insecurity and uncertainty, and therefore, limitation prevents disturbance or deprivation ..... whether in a court of first instance or of appeal or revision, against the same party for the same relief shall be excluded, where such proceeding is prosecuted in good faith in a court -: -"which, from defect of jurisdiction or other cause of a like nature, is unable to entertain it. (3) notwithstanding anything contained in .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

Smt. Priyadarshini Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... muni raju r/a no.32, eshwar temple road ramohalli, kengeri hobli bangalore south taluk bangalore - 560 074. 3 . sri. m.k. ayyappa commissioner, transport department, transport building, shanti nagar bangalore 560027. 4 . jagadeesh thahasildhar bangalore south taluk aged about45years bangalore 560 009. 10 5 . shivanna rtd. deputy thahsildar aged about61years bangalore ..... that cannot be lightly interfered with. the unconstitutionality must be plainly and clearly established before an enactment is declared as void. the same approach holds good while ascertaining the intent and purpose of an enactment or its scope and application. now, the result of the impugned judgment is that the amending ..... evaluating the evidence. primafacie opinion formed by the special court for taking cognizance of the offence cannot be found fault with. we do not find any good ground to entertain the petition and hence, writ petition stands dismissed. re: w.p.no.1348/2018 164. on a complaint filed by second respondent .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

Sri Lakshmichand Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... muni raju r/a no.32, eshwar temple road ramohalli, kengeri hobli bangalore south taluk bangalore - 560 074. 3 . sri. m.k. ayyappa commissioner, transport department, transport building, shanti nagar bangalore 560027. 4 . jagadeesh thahasildhar bangalore south taluk aged about45years bangalore 560 009. 10 5 . shivanna rtd. deputy thahsildar aged about61years bangalore ..... that cannot be lightly interfered with. the unconstitutionality must be plainly and clearly established before an enactment is declared as void. the same approach holds good while ascertaining the intent and purpose of an enactment or its scope and application. now, the result of the impugned judgment is that the amending ..... evaluating the evidence. primafacie opinion formed by the special court for taking cognizance of the offence cannot be found fault with. we do not find any good ground to entertain the petition and hence, writ petition stands dismissed. re: w.p.no.1348/2018 164. on a complaint filed by second respondent .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

B. B. Giridhar Shanbhog Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... muni raju r/a no.32, eshwar temple road ramohalli, kengeri hobli bangalore south taluk bangalore - 560 074. 3 . sri. m.k. ayyappa commissioner, transport department, transport building, shanti nagar bangalore 560027. 4 . jagadeesh thahasildhar bangalore south taluk aged about45years bangalore 560 009. 10 5 . shivanna rtd. deputy thahsildar aged about61years bangalore ..... that cannot be lightly interfered with. the unconstitutionality must be plainly and clearly established before an enactment is declared as void. the same approach holds good while ascertaining the intent and purpose of an enactment or its scope and application. now, the result of the impugned judgment is that the amending ..... evaluating the evidence. primafacie opinion formed by the special court for taking cognizance of the offence cannot be found fault with. we do not find any good ground to entertain the petition and hence, writ petition stands dismissed. re: w.p.no.1348/2018 164. on a complaint filed by second respondent .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

Smt Parvathi Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... muni raju r/a no.32, eshwar temple road ramohalli, kengeri hobli bangalore south taluk bangalore - 560 074. 3 . sri. m.k. ayyappa commissioner, transport department, transport building, shanti nagar bangalore 560027. 4 . jagadeesh thahasildhar bangalore south taluk aged about45years bangalore 560 009. 10 5 . shivanna rtd. deputy thahsildar aged about61years bangalore ..... that cannot be lightly interfered with. the unconstitutionality must be plainly and clearly established before an enactment is declared as void. the same approach holds good while ascertaining the intent and purpose of an enactment or its scope and application. now, the result of the impugned judgment is that the amending ..... evaluating the evidence. primafacie opinion formed by the special court for taking cognizance of the offence cannot be found fault with. we do not find any good ground to entertain the petition and hence, writ petition stands dismissed. re: w.p.no.1348/2018 164. on a complaint filed by second respondent .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

H Kumaraswamy Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... muni raju r/a no.32, eshwar temple road ramohalli, kengeri hobli bangalore south taluk bangalore - 560 074. 3 . sri. m.k. ayyappa commissioner, transport department, transport building, shanti nagar bangalore 560027. 4 . jagadeesh thahasildhar bangalore south taluk aged about45years bangalore 560 009. 10 5 . shivanna rtd. deputy thahsildar aged about61years bangalore ..... that cannot be lightly interfered with. the unconstitutionality must be plainly and clearly established before an enactment is declared as void. the same approach holds good while ascertaining the intent and purpose of an enactment or its scope and application. now, the result of the impugned judgment is that the amending ..... evaluating the evidence. primafacie opinion formed by the special court for taking cognizance of the offence cannot be found fault with. we do not find any good ground to entertain the petition and hence, writ petition stands dismissed. re: w.p.no.1348/2018 164. on a complaint filed by second respondent .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

Sri S Anneyappa Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... muni raju r/a no.32, eshwar temple road ramohalli, kengeri hobli bangalore south taluk bangalore - 560 074. 3 . sri. m.k. ayyappa commissioner, transport department, transport building, shanti nagar bangalore 560027. 4 . jagadeesh thahasildhar bangalore south taluk aged about45years bangalore 560 009. 10 5 . shivanna rtd. deputy thahsildar aged about61years bangalore ..... that cannot be lightly interfered with. the unconstitutionality must be plainly and clearly established before an enactment is declared as void. the same approach holds good while ascertaining the intent and purpose of an enactment or its scope and application. now, the result of the impugned judgment is that the amending ..... evaluating the evidence. primafacie opinion formed by the special court for taking cognizance of the offence cannot be found fault with. we do not find any good ground to entertain the petition and hence, writ petition stands dismissed. re: w.p.no.1348/2018 164. on a complaint filed by second respondent .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //