Court : Delhi
..... is proper to be done instead in such cases, provided that no such exemption and authority shall be deemed to have been granted unless not less than twothirds of the members present of the academic council voted in favour of the motion for such exemption and authority made by, or with the written authority of the vice-chancellor; and provided further that this two-thirds majority voting for the exemption should not be less than half .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... is proper to be done instead in such cases, provided that no such exemption and authority shall be deemed to have been granted unless not less than twothirds of the members present of the academic council voted in favour of the motion for such exemption and authority made by, or with the written authority of the vice-chancellor; and provided further that this two-thirds majority voting for the exemption should not be less than half .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... is proper to be done instead in such cases, provided that no such exemption and authority shall be deemed to have been granted unless not less than twothirds of the members present of the academic council voted in favour of the motion for such exemption and authority made by, or with the written authority of the vice-chancellor; and provided further that this two-thirds majority voting for the exemption should not be less than half .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... moreover the film is a documentary and cannot be equated with the motion pictures which generally cater for mass audience. 15. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
1. by way of this order, i propose to decide the above mentioned pending application under order xxxix rules 1 and 2 read with section 151 cpc. 2. the plaintiff has filed the suit for permanent injunction restraining infringement of trademark, passing off, dilution, unfair competition, rendition of accounts of profits, damages and delivery up against the defendants. 3. the facts of the case as per the plaint are that the plaintiff-company was incorporated in the year 1986 who is also the registered proprietor of the trademark superflo which is also dominant and essential part of its company name who also started using the trademark from the very inception of the company in 1986. it is claimed that the plaintiff is engaged in the business of, inter alia, manufacturing sanitary ware accessories, bath room fittings and other allied products and it has the core competence of the plaintiff company to manufacture products and scores of applications where control of flow of water is required, including but not limited to, high precision plastic injection mouldings of cistern fittings for the sanitary ware industry, inlet valves used in overhead tanks, water coolers for drinking water, washing machines, air coolers, water filters for drinking water and others. the plaintiff-company also manufactures products in the nature of and including but not limited to, seat covers (soft close and as well as non-soft close) and plastic cisterns, and a range of internal mechanisms for the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
1. the plaintiff has filed the suit for infringement, permanent injunction, restraining passing off and rendition of accounts against the defendant. relevant facts of the case as per the plaint 2. the plaintiff claims that he is the proprietor of the proprietorship firm "senge himalayan ceramics" dealing in tea / coffee mugs, tea cup saucer, bowls, hotelwares, handicrafts, etc. since the plaintiff's forefathers are from tibet, the plaintiff as a child had grown up with the tibetan mythology and has been very fond of the same and its beliefs. as per the tibetan mythology, the word 'senge' means an auspicious and fearless snow lion. 3. it is alleged that the plaintiff being inspired by the concept and strength of senge adopted and conceived the mark senge with the device of a fearless lion (hereinafter referred to as the "plaintiff's said trademark/logo") in relation to his business of tours and travels in the year 2000 in the name and style of "senge travel and tours", registered on 7th june, 2000 and in which company the plaintiff is one of the directors. the following symbol used by the plaintiff in the year 2000 in the said "senge travel and tours" is consisted of two snow lions: image ? 4. subsequent to his travel and tour business, the plaintiff in the year 2002 also started his business of ceramics by way of a proprietorship firm in the name of "senge himalayan ceramics" wherein he started to deal in crockery items such as tea / coffee mugs, tea cup saucer, bowls, .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
1. the plaintiff has filed the suit for passing off on the basis of prior user and adopter of the mark innovolt ?. the plaintiff claims that they are the proprietor of the mark, as it is a coined mark which cannot be appropriated by the defendant in relation to same description of alleged and cognate goods. 2. the main case of the plaintiff is that the plaintiff adopted the mark innovolt for a wide range of products and services related to electronic and power saving since 2005 and 2007 in the united states of america and in india respectively. the mark "innovolt" was first coined by the plaintiff. it has been using the mark "innovolt" worldwide since 2005 and commercially since 2008. 3. the mark "innovolt" is registered in usa vide registration no. 4070632 since 13th december, 2011. the said mark of the plaintiff is presently pending registration in india vide application no. 2231196 in class 9 for "voltage surge protectors and voltage surge suppressors". 4. the reputation of the "innovolt" name/mark is not limited only to electronics/appliance protection, but to other activities as well. the plaintiff has developed new products and services and expanded its market share with an ever growing range of branded goods and services. substantial goodwill and worldwide reputation have accrued to the plaintiff as a result of continuous sales, sales promotion and advertising of products bearing the "innovolt" trademark by the plaintiff. 5. the domain name of the plaintiff being www. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... 10 lacs at the time of second motion of divorce and the remaining rs. ..... 13 lacs shall be paid at the time of first motion, rs. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... . courts have not always kept the legal aspects in mind and have occasionally even stayed the regular process of employment being set in motion and in some cases, even directed that these illegal, irregular or improper entrants be absorbed into service ..... . the process must be set in motion within six months from this date .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... order xii rule 6 cpc empowers the court to, where the admissions of fact have been made, either in the pleadings or otherwise, whether orally or in writing to, either on the application of any party or of its own motion, without determination of any other question between the parties, make such order or give such judgment, as it thinks fit having regard to such admissions. .....
Tag this Judgment!