Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: motion of thanks Court: delhi Page 1 of about 7,032 results (0.043 seconds)

A.m. Vs.state & Ors.

Court : Delhi

..... section 53 of the act which is titled revision , however, provides that the high court may at any time, either of its own motion or on an application received on that behalf, call for the record of any proceeding in which any competent authority or court of session has passed an order for the purpose of satisfying itself as to the legality or propriety of any such order, ..... the high court may, at any time, either on its own motion or on an application received in this behalf, call for the record of any proceeding in which any committee or board or children's court, or court has passed an order, for the purpose of satisfying itself as to the legality or propriety of any such ..... the high court may, at any time, either of its own motion or on an application received in this behalf, call for the record of any proceeding in which any competent authority or court of session has passed an order for the purpose of satisfying itself as such order and may pass such .....

Karnataka Containers (P) Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in : (1991)LC754Tri(Delhi)

..... revision by board or collector-(l) the central board of excises and customs constituted under the central boards of revenue act, 1963 (54 of 1963), (hereinafter referred to as the board), may, of its own motion or otherwise, call for and examine the record of any proceeding in which any decision or order has been passed under this act or the rules made thereunder by a collector of central excise (not being a decision or order ..... the central board of excises and customs constituted under the central boards of revenue act, 1963 may of its own motion or otherwise, call for and examine the record of any proceeding in which any decision or order has been passed under this act or the rules made thereunder (not being a decision or order passed on appeal under .....

South India Alloy Industries Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in : (1986)(6)LC256Tri(Delhi)

..... -(1) central board of excise and customs constituted under the central boards of revenue act, 1963 (54 of 1963) (hereinafter referred to as the board) may, of its own motion or otherwise, call for and examine the record of any proceeding in which any decision or order has been passed under this act or the rules made thereunder by a collector of central excise (not being a decision or order ..... (2) the collector of central excise may, of his own motion or otherwise, call for and examine the record of any proceeding in which any decision or order has been passed under this act or the rules made thereunder by a central excise officer subordinate to him (not being a .....

Nadeem Alias Nadim Vs. State

Court : Delhi

..... 27 this section states that the high court may at any time either on its own motion or on an application received in this behalf call for the record of any proceedings in which any competent authority or court of session has passed an order for the purpose of satisfying itself as to the legality or propriety of any such order in ..... - the high court may, at any time, either of its own motion or on an application received in this behalf, call for the record of any proceeding in which any competent authority or court of sessions has passed an order for the purpose of satisfying itself as to the legality or propriety of any such order .....

Satish Saini and ors. Vs. Mcd and anr.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 111(2004)DLT417; 2004(74)DRJ366; 2005(1)SLJ83(Delhi)

..... (4) the corporation shall after considering the comments of the standing committee, sanction of the first schedule either without modifications or with such modifications as it thinks fit and thereafter may amend it either on its own motion or af ter ascertaining the views of the commissioner and the committee concerned or at the instance of the commissioner or committee. ..... comments thereon before the corporation for its consideration and approval and shall sanction the second either without modifications or with such modifications as it thinks fit and t hereafter may amend it either on its own motion after ascertaining the views of the commissioner or at his instance. .....

Chander Kanta Vs. Hans Kumar and anr.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : AIR1989Delhi73; 1988(14)DRJ337; 1988RLR297

..... section 23 would come into operation in a case like the present one when one of the parties refuses to join in the second motion and the other party has no alternative but to make an application to the court for orders on the petition already presented under section 13b(1) of the act ..... thus, in my opinion, the trial court rightly held that even if the averments made by the respondent in the first motion may be conclusive qua him, since the court has to be satisfied about the correctness of the averments and this controversy raised ..... time of one of the parties who has waited for over six months for filing the second motion will be wasted and a party who wants to harass and is guilty of abuse of the ..... in the present case is whether the trial court was right in allowing the respondent to adduce evidence to show that even at the time of filing of the first joint motion, the petitioner and the respondent were living together and they have continued to live together even thereafter. ..... view, since the court has to be satisfied about the correctness of the averments in the first joint motion made by the parties, the controversy can be resolved either by allowing the parties to lead oral evidence ..... the legislature provided for an interval of a period of six months between the first motion and the second motion in 'order to afford the parties further opportunity for reconciliation, if one party is allowed to withdraw the consent even when other grounds, namely that the parties continue to .....

Anita Sarwal Vs. Deepak Sarwal

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 46(1992)DLT502; I(1992)DMC420

..... (1) the present petition is directed against the order of additional district judge dated october 11, 1991, only to the extent that he declined to waive the second motion under section 13-b of the hindu marriage act, 1955, (hereinafter referred to as t act) and has not passed any order with regard to the same. ..... ' (5) the learned counsel for the petitioner, as well as, for the respondent have argued that the requirement of a motion within the time specified under sub-section (2) of section 13-b is merely a matter of formality and that a decree of divorce can be granted, without waiting for the period of six months, specified under sub-section (2), if a court is satisfied in a ..... he further ordered that the second motion may be made within the statutory period of limitation. ..... it provides that 'on the motion of both the parties ...if the petition is not withdrawn in the meantime, the court shall...pass a decree of divorce... ..... the spouse may not by a party to the joint motion under sub-section (2). ..... the court, thereforee, gets no jurisdiction to make a decree for divorce, prior to the expiry of the period, as specified in the section and the consent must continue when the second motion is made. ..... (2) on the motion of both the parties made not earlier than six months after the date of the presentation of the petition referred to in sub-section (1)and not later than eighteen months after the said date, if the .....

Swantantra Ved Sahni Vs. Santosh Kumari

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 1988(15)DRJ6; 1988RLR469

..... the two parties who have filed a joint petition for divorce by mutual consent under section 13-b(1) of the hindu marriage act, can the divorce be granted by the matrimonial court on a motion only by one of the spouses under section 13-b(2) of the act (2) a joint petition for dissolution of the marriage by mutual consent was moved by the petitioner and the respondent on 10-8- ..... not used the words 'both parties' in the context of the withdrawal of the petition, while it has used the said words in the same section for the purposes of initial petition, as well as the motion, it will have to be held that the petition can be withdrawn by either party with the leave of the court. ..... the change introduced by section 13-b is that whereas under section 28 of the special marriage act a second motion cannot be presented before one year and not later than two years, the hindu marriage act, as amended, reduced the said periods to six months and ..... , after filing of the joint petition under section 13-b, at the second stage of the joint motion, the wife withdrew her consent by a statement before the court. ..... for passing a decree of divorce under sub-section 2 the motion has to be made by both the parties under sub- ..... the provision regarding withdrawal with that of the filing of the petition under sub-clause i and the motion to be made under sub-clause 2 the position would be clear. ..... not join the proceedings or in other words did not consent for the second motion to be made under the said sub-section. .....

Rashtriya Mukti Morcha, Through Its President, Ravinder Kumar Vs. Unio ...

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 137(2007)DLT195

vijender jain, acting c.j.1. this writ petition was filed in the year 1999 with the following prayers:(i) the president had no discretion in the matter and he should have invited the acknowledged leader of opposition in lok sabha during the process of consultation and not a person who was not the elected member of the house;(ii) the disregard to the well established constitutional convention has hurt the basic structure of the constitution;(iii) no person who is not a citizen within meaning of article 5 of the constitution has the right to be elected or appointed to any public office under the constitution;(iv) the recognition granted by the election commission under section 29a of the representation of people act, 1951 is limited by the constitution to only to such political party/parties which has/have as its/their office bearers citizens who come within meaning of article 5 of the constitution;(v) no person who does not satisfy the requirements of article 5 can be appointed in the union/state council of ministers.however, as prayers (i) & (ii) no longer survive the petitioner is insisting on prayers (iii), (iv) & (v) of the writ petition.2. mr. p.n. lekhi, learned senior advocate for the petitioner has very forcefully argued the matter confining himself to prayers (iii), (iv) & (v) of the writ petition. before hearing the present matter, counsel from both the sides had agreed that they would address arguments not targeting any particular individual be it the president of .....

Sh. Abhay Chauhan Vs. Ms. Rachna Singh

Court : Delhi

Reported in : AIR2006Delhi18; 119(2005)DLT513; I(2005)DMC801; 2005(82)DRJ1

..... divorce by mutual consent - (1) x x x x x x x x (2) on the motion of both parties made not earlier than six months after the date of the presentation of the petition referred to in sub-section(1) and not later than eighteen months after the said date, if the petition is ..... the first motion was allowed on 18th december, 2004 but on 21st december, 2004 the learned addl. .....