Court : Delhi
..... . a person, who by any means causes an animal to move, is said to move that animal, and to move everything which, in consequence of the motion so caused, is moved by that animal .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... . a person, who by any means causes an animal to move, is said to move that animal, and to move everything which, in consequence of the motion so caused, is moved by that animal .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... . a person, who by any means causes an animal to move, is said to move that animal, and to move everything which, in consequence of the motion so caused, is moved by that animal .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
* % + in the high court of delhi at new delhi date of decision:13. h march, 2018 cs(os) no.499/2009 & cc nos. 81/2009 & 40/2010, ia nos. 17283/2013 (u/o vii r-11 cpc), 2432/2015 (u/o vi r-17 cpc) shyama pahwa ..... plaintiff through: mr. shailendar dahiya, adv. versus narendra pratap bhalla & ors. ..... defendants through: mr. sajan narain, adv. for d-1&2. mr. sunil goyal, mr. deepak, adv. for d-3. ms. suruchi suri, adv. for d-4. coram: hon'ble mr. justice rajiv sahai endlaw1 the plaintiff, aged 73 years at the time of institution of the suit, in the year 2009 instituted this suit against her three brothers impleaded as defendants no.1 to 3 viz. a) narendra pratap bhalla, b) bharat bhushan bhalla; and, c) mahinder pratap bhalla and her sister smt. kamla ohri (defendant no.4).2. it was the case in the plaint i) that the plaintiff had been suffering from chronic depression for the past years and had been under psychiatric treatment since 1961; ii) that the plaintiff was residing at mumbai since 1982 but used to visit her parents and stay cs(os) no.499/2009 page 1 of 23 with them in delhi in property no.s-61, greater kailash part-i, new delhi; iii) that the plaintiff, in august, 2008, shifted to delhi along with her husband; the husband of the plaintiff died on 19th september, 2008; iv) that the condition of the plaintiff deteriorated in the last few months preceding the filing of the suit and the plaintiff had been suffering from bipolar affective disorder with symptoms .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
$~cp-45 * % + co.pet. 307/1999 in the high court of delhi at new delhi date of decision:13. 03.2018 minnie pan (india) p. ltd. ........ petitioner through mr.rachit mittal and ms.tanvi aggarwal, advs. for noida authority mr.mukesh kumar singh, adv. for the workmen mr. sonal kumar singh, adv. m/s eurobike ltd. versus ..... respondent through mr. arjun singh bhati, adv. in ca1222015/auction purcahser ms.isha khanna, adv. for the ol. coram: hon'ble mr. justice jayant nath jayant nath, j.(oral) ca no.122/2015 and 1258/2006 1. ca no.122/2015 has been filed by the auction purchaser-m/s. real contracts pvt. ltd. seeking a direction to the noida authority for transferring/mutation of the property bearing no.c-6, phase ii, noida u.p. in favour of the applicant on payment of transfer charges as recorded by this court in its order dated 29.07.2004.2. ca no.1258/2006 is filed by upfc for modification of the order dated 29.07.2004.3. some of the brief facts are that the respondent company-m/s. eurobike ltd. went into winding up some time in 1999. the ol took charge co. pet. 307/1999 page 1 of 9 of the assets of the company on 06.10.1999. it is the case of the upfc that it is a secured creditor and the property in question i.e. c-6, phase ii, noida u.p. was charged to it. this court on 13.12.2001 permitted the ol to dispose of the said property by way of auction.4. it is in this background that some of the orders passed by this court would be relevant. on 20.11.2003, this court had noted .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... this was to enable the appellant to file a joint petition for the second motion in the decree of divorce. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
* % + in the high court of delhi at new delhi date of decision:10. h may, 2018 cs(os) 149/2011 & ias no.6305/2011 (of defendant u/s4of partition act) & 17463/2013 (of defendant u/o vii r-11(d) cpc) sunil gupta through: mr. p.r. agarwal, mr. y.r. sharma and ms. apoorna gulati, advs. with plaintiff in person. .... plaintiff nargis khanna versus ...defendant through: mr. harkirat sawhney and ms. bharti chawla, advs. coram: hon'ble mr. justice rajiv sahai endlaw1 the plaintiff, as per the amended plaint dated 20th february, 2013, has filed the present, suit for partition of property no.n-47, panchsheel park, new delhi and for rendition of accounts and mesne profits thereof, pleading (i) that the plaintiff purchased 50% undivided unspecified share in the property from prem kumar dewan, brother of the defendant, by way of a registered agreement to sell; though the said agreement to sell executed by prem kumar dewan was in favour of the plaintiff and one suneet seth but the said suneet seth executed documents of transfer of his share in favour of the plaintiff, therefore the plaintiff has become the sole owner of undivided, unspecified 50% share in the said property; (ii) that the plaintiff is also in actual, physical, settled, peaceful possession of the entire second floor, entire terrace above the second floor, entire driveway adjoining property no.n-45 of the said property and is also in symbolic and cs(os) 149/2011 page 1 of 19 proprietary possession of the remaining portions of .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... sapra seeks time to obtain instructions and initiate motion in this regard. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
* + in the high court of delhi at new delhi reserved on:31. 05.2018 pronounced on:06. 06.2018 w.p.(c) 5912/2018 & cm appl. 23033-23034/2018 allied integrated society (regd.) and ors. ........ petitioners mr. sudhir nandrajog, sr. adv. with through: mr. sumit choudhary, adv. versus the state (nct of delhi) through: mr. satyakam, asc, gnctd. ..... respondent coram: hon'ble mr. justice s. ravindra bhat hon'ble mr. justice a.k. chawla mr. justice s. ravindra bhat % 1. the present common petition, by four non-governmental organizations, challenges a tender condition formulated by the govt. of nct of delhi (hereafter gnctd or nct ) while inviting bids for the mid-day cooked meals scheme formulated by it. the petitioners allege that the eligibility condition of a minimum threshold of rupees three crores average financial turnover, during the previous three years, is arbitrary.2. all the petitioners are voluntary non-governmental organizations (ngos) formed between 1995 and 2006. they are iso certified agencies and have been providing services, in the past, to the govt. of nct of delhi, by supplying mid-day meals to children studying in its schools. they are aggrieved by a condition introduced in its request for proposal (rfp) issued directorate of education, govt. of nct of delhi, which deals with the selection process to be eligible for an npo/ngo/voluntary organization/anybody corporate for providing/supplying freshly cooked hot mid-day- meal (mid-day-meal) for three years to the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
* in the high court of delhi at new delhi judgment reserved on:27. 02.2018 judgment pronounced on:20. 07.2018 .petitioner through: ms. abha roy with mr. piyush versus kant roy, advocates. .respondents through: mr. jasmeet singh, cgsc for uoi with mr. srivats kaushal, advocate. + w.p.(c) no.10587/2016 mohammad abdul moyeed union of india & ors coram: hon'ble mr. justice rajiv shakdher rajiv shakdher, j.prefatory facts 1. the petitioner before this court is a person by the name md. abdul moyeed who seeks to enter india but has been denied permission to do so as he has been, evidently, put on a blacklist by the respondents. the petitioner who was born and brought up in india migrated to canada in 1997 and thereafter, applied and consequently, acquired canadian citizenship in may, 2001. 1.1 the petitioner is also an overseas citizen of india cardholder (in short oci cardholder ). the record reveals that the petitioner has two wives, one of whom is a canadian national. from his canadian wife, i.e., ms. rayees fathima, he has three children whereas, from his indian wife, i.e., one, ms. syeda kausar, he has four children who hold indian passports. it is also not in dispute that the petitioner is a civil engineer w.p.(c) no.10587/2016 page 1 of 20 by profession, which is a qualification that he acquired in india and that, his mother was a teacher in a government school in musheerabad, hyderabad.2. it is averred by the petitioner that since he received information that one of his sons .....
Tag this Judgment!