Mo - Judgment Search Results

Mo. Ammar vs the State (Govt. of Nct of Delhi)

Court: Delhi

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 5066/2025 MO. AMMAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajiv Khosla, AdvocateversusTHE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) .....Respondent Through: Ms. Manjeet Arya,

Mohammed Sadik @ Mo Sadik vs S.Saravanan

Court: Chennai

C.V. KARTHIKEYAN AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU CMA Nos. 2744 & 2745 of 2022 C.M.A.No.2744 of 2022 Mohammed Sadik @ Mo Sadik Petitioner/Appellant Vs 1.S.Saravanan (Since R1 remained ex-parte before the Tribunal his presence may be

Mo. Kandaswami Singh and Etc. Vs. State of Tamil Nadu and Others

Court: Chennai

Reported in: AIR1994Mad2

ORDER1. W.P. No. 12798 of 1993 is filed by MO. Kandaswami Singh, President of Ambcdkar Socialist Society. Maraimalai Nagar, Chengalpattu, seeking the relief of declaration that the naming

M/S. Mo Engineering Pvt. Limited, Vs. Cce, New Delhi

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

appeal filed by the party before the Commissioner (Appeals) against the order of the Assistant Commissioner disallowing certain Modvat credit and imposing penalty, they had raised a specific ground that the order of adjudication passed in 1999

Stainback Vs. Mo Hock Ke Lok Po

Court: US Supreme Court

Stainback v. Mo Hock Ke Lok Po - 336 U.S. 368 (1949) U.S. Supreme Court Stainback v. Mo Hock Ke Lok

Ma Shwe Mya Vs. Maung Mo Hnaung

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: (1922)24BOMLR682

is quite true that there is other evidence to suggest that what took place on that occasion was more in the nature of an evasion than of a direct refusal ; but, if the plaintiff is going

Late Sri G.Nageswara Rao Rep.By Sri G.Mo Vs. The Commissioner of Incom ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

be sustained in law and the order of assessment ought to have been set aside or at least modified. However, the appeal was dismissed as a whole. We are of the view that this is a rare

M/S.Mohapatra Binder, Rep.by Its Prop.Sibananda Mo Vs. State of Odisha ...

Court: Orissa

matter of applications under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. -------W.P.(C) No.13203 of 2013 M/s. Mohapatra Binder, represented by its Proprietor Sibananda Mohapatra, AT: Makarba Sahi, Cuttack and 58 others W.P.(C) No.14475 of 2013

Director of Revenue of Mo. Vs. Cobank Acb

Court: US Supreme Court

Director of Revenue of Mo. v. CoBank ACB - 531 U.S. 316 (2001) OCTOBER TERM, 2000 Syllabus DIRECTOR OF REVENUE OF MISSOURI v.

Associated Industries of Mo. Vs. Lohman

Court: US Supreme Court

Associated Industries of Mo. v. Lohman - 511 U.S. 641 (1994) OCTOBER TERM, 1993 Syllabus ASSOCIATED INDUSTRIES OF MISSOURI ET AL. v.