Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: mizoram university act 2000 section 5 powers of the university Sorted by: recent Page 7 of about 190 results (0.217 seconds)

Apr 26 2005 (HC)

Hrangthanmawii Vs. Lai Autonomous District Council and ors.

Court : Guwahati

..... a person other than her. it is the contention of the petitioner that though the academic qualification for the post of aeo is a graduate of a recognized university, the dpc recommended the respondent no. 5, who is merely a matriculate, for the said post. the council-respondents accepted the recommendation and thereupon promoted the respondent ..... prays for quashing the orders promoting the respondent nos. 4 and 5 to the posts of assistant education officer in the office of the lai autonomous district council, mizoram and for directing the respondents-council to 'remote her to the said post w.e.f 10.4.2002.2. to appreciate the controversy involved in the writ ..... not arise). the dpc reconsidered the matter and again recommended the promotion of the petitioner vide the proceeding dated 11.7.2002. the recommendation was not again not acted upon. thereupon, the petitioner filed another representation to the council-respondents on 29.1.2003, when no action was taken, this writ petition was filed by .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 30 2005 (HC)

Dilip Kumar Gupta and ors. Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : 2005(2)BLJR1059; [2005(2)JCR293(Jhr)]

..... under 'kameshwar stngh darbhanga sanskrit vishvidyalaya act, 1960 (bihar act 6 of 1960)'. subsequently, 'bihar state universities act, 1976' covered almost all the universities, situated within the territory of the state of bihar, except patna university, rajendra agriculture university and birsa agriculture university, for which separate acts were passed. under section 3 of the 'bihar state universities act, 1976, 'the establishment and incorporation of the universities' within the territory of the then ..... that the deputy director (secondary education), bihar, patna, having distorted the fact, had sent wrong information to the secretary, school examination board, patna by the aforesaid letter dated 29th march, 2000.the government of bihar through its education department while issued resolution no. 394 dated llth april, 1983, the subject was shown as 'regarding recognition of examination, conducted by sampurnand sanskrit .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 08 2004 (HC)

Reeja Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Reported in : 2004(3)KLT599

..... the possibility of such rackets in two of its recent decisions in j. k. bharati and suman enterprises,this view is also supported by the universally recognized belief that the state-sponsored lotteries inevitably lead to large-scale frauds and crimes and that as the country's dependency on lotteries increases, so ..... draws of all kinds of lotteries between such periods of the day as many be prescribed by the state government. however, the governments of arunachal pradesh, mizoram and maharashtra have devised an amazing strategem to circumvent the provision of section 4(h) to continue the daily lotteries - coupled with multiple draws. the ..... has been, since 1870 made an offence under section 294a of the indian penal code. gambling agreements have been declared to be void under the indian contract act, 1872 (section 30), this, in short, is how gambling is viewed in india .......................................................(42) it will be abundantly clear from the foregoing observations that .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 04 2004 (HC)

Suresh Kumar and ors. Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : [2004(2)JCR274(Jhr)]

..... the nature sought by shri venugopal would be in clear transgression of the provisions of the university act and the regulations of the university. we cannot by our fiat direct the university to disobey the statute to which it owes its existence and the regulations made by the university itself. we cannot imagine anything more destructive of the rule of law than a direction by ..... the said provisi6n, learned additional government advocate submits that in view of the said provisions under the state act, the state government has competence to direct the examining authorities like the karnataka state secondary education examination board or the university established under the karnataka state universities act, 1976 to conduct examination for students of unaffiliated institutions/colleges. in my opinion, such a stand raised .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 19 2003 (HC)

Chhatrapal Singh Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : (2003)3UPLBEC2634

..... held that a judgment may not be followed in a given case if it has some distinguishing features.22. in bhavnagar university v. palitana sugar mill (p) ltd.. : air2003sc511 , the hon'ble supreme court held that a decision is an ..... j.a.c. saldanna air 1980 sc 327; a.k, roy and am. v. state of punjab and ors. : 1986crilj2037 ; state of mizoram v. biakchhawna : (1995)1scc156 ; j.n. ganatra v. morvi municipality, morvi : air1996sc2520 ; babu verghese and ors., v. bar council of ..... ors. : air1999sc3558 ; haresh dayaram thakur v. state of maharashtra and ors. : air2000sc2281 ; delhi administration v. gurdip singh and ors. : (2000)7scc296 ; dhanajaya reddy v. state of karnataka etc. etc., (2001) 4 scc 9 and commissioner of income tax, mumbai v. anjum m ..... , especially when the literal reading produces an intelligible result. the court cannot aid the legislatures defeating phrasing of an act or add or mend, and by construction, make up deficiencies which arc there.'9. similarly, in siddappa vasappa kuri .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 28 2003 (HC)

Sapthagiri Educational Trust rep. by Its Chairman, M. Jothiprakasam, V ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (2003)2MLJ358

..... senior counsel contended that ncte did not formulate any regulation on the basis of the judgment in unnikrishnan's case and it was the university grants commission which had formulated regulations in terms of unnikrishnan's case. ncte act had prescribed only norms and standards for teacher education institutions and did not visualise interference with the process of admission.10. mr. n ..... to be examined as against the provisions under all india council for technical education act and it was held that de-recognition by the state government or disaffiliation by the universities on grounds inconsistent with the central act would be inoperative and that the central act should prevail.14. the rights of various types of educational institutions viz., minority and non-minority institutions, aided .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 17 2003 (HC)

State of Mizoram and anr. Vs. Vatech Escher Wiss Flovel Ltd.

Court : Guwahati

..... action as suggested by it. referring to the impugned judgment and order, the learned advocate general, mizoram, submitted that the learned single judge having concluded that there was no material to hold that the state respondents had acted irrationally by not allowing the respondent-writ petitioner to participate and that there was nothing to infer ..... that of m/s jyoti limited for settlement of the contract, relating to execution of the project. the learned counsel strenuously urged that as per the universally accepted, norms relating to two pails bids system any modification in the techno commercial offer was bound to have a bearing on the financial offer and, therefore ..... prevalent facts interference by way of judicial review is not contemplated.14. the apex court in air india limited v. cochin international airport limited, and ors., (2000) 2 scc 617, paragraph 7 whereof has been extracted in its extenso by the learned single judge had, inter alia, observed that the state can choose its .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 08 2003 (HC)

Pup Thangchhuana and anr. Vs. the North Eastern Hill University and or ...

Court : Guwahati

..... any further, it needs to be noted that during the pendency of this writ petition, the mizoram university act, 2000 (hereinafter referred to as the 'act') came into force with effect from 20.4.2000, which was the date of publication of the act aforementioned in the official gazette. sections 6, 7 and 33 of the act read as under :'6. on and from the commencement of this ..... of the petitioners before this court, at the time of hearing, are incorrect. what he has submitted is that with the coming into force of the 2000 act, the petitioners have become employees of the mizoram university and if they are found fit for being giving reliefs, then, the same may be done without adversely affecting the promotion of the private respondents.10. upon .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 02 2002 (HC)

Laxman Das Vs. Deoji Mal and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : AIR2003Raj74; 2002(4)WLC297; 2002(4)WLN664

..... ; (air 1998 sc 703), subash chander sharma v. state of punjab, (1999) 5 scc 171 : (air 1999 sc 2076); bharathidasan university v. all india council for technical education (2001) 8 scc 676 : (air 2001 sc 2861); and mor modern co-operative transport society ..... . saldanna, air 1980 sc 326, a. k.roy v. state of punjab, (1986) 4 scc 326 ;(air 1986 sc 2160); state of mizoram v.biakchhawna, (1995) 1 scc 156 : (1995 airscw 1497); j. n. ganatra v. morvi municipality morvi, air 1996 sc 2520; babuverghese ..... original suit relates to eviction of the tenant under the provisions of the rajasthan premises (control of rent and eviction) act, 1950, whatever the judgment and decree to be passed by the learned trial court shall be appealable and the affidavit ..... 8 scc 266 : (air 1999 sc 3558); haresh dayaram thakur v. state of maharashtra, (2000) 6 scc 179 : (air 2000 sc 2281); delhi administration v. gurdip singh, (2000) 7 scc 296 : (air 2000 sc 3737); dhananjaya reddy v. state of karnataka, (2001) 4 scc 9 : (air .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 23 2002 (HC)

Mahatama Gandhi National Institute of Medical Sciences Vs. State of Ra ...

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : RLW2003(2)Raj884

..... one desirous of starting an institution purely for the purposes of educating the students could do so but sections 22 & 23 of the university grants commission act which prohibits the award of degrees except by a university must be kept in mind.'as regards third question, the apex court (per mohan,j.) held as under:-'76. applying these tests, ..... they did not opt for payment seats obviously because for state medical colleges, student taking admission to mbbs course is required to pay approx. annual fee at rs. 2000/- as against in private medical college like the petitioner institute even of free seat at annual fee of rs. 60,000/- due to hostal accommodation having been ..... for free/merit and payment seats in private medical colleges will be as notified by the state government in view of letter no. mci 34(41)2000-med/dated 30.12.2000.'15. for the present controversy, significant and relevant clause of ordinance 272 is clause v which pertains to interview by admission and allotment of place of .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //