Court : Delhi
..... to the government of maharashtra, on 4th july, 2005, for grant of permission to start the college, as was required by the maharashtra universities act, 1994 (hereinafter referred to as the university act ). no response being forthcoming, to the said application, from the government of maharashtra, the appellant approached the high court, by way of ..... january, 2019. no applications were, therefore, invited, for the two new iteps, from institutions located in the state of manipur. (ix) the states of mizoram, nagaland and west bengal communicated, vide their letters dated 27th february, 2019, 31st january, 2019 and 5th march, 2019, addressed to the ncte, conveying ..... state government, therefore, has to be negatived. (emphasis supplied) 77. the italicised words from the above-extracted passage from sant dnyaneshwar shikshan shastra mahavidyalaya3 are 27 (2000) 5 scc23128 (1986) 4 scc361w.p. (c) 7666/2019 & other connected matters page 79 of 84 significant , as they hold, categorically, that it is .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... of the candidates concerned, as evaluation of ll.m. dissertations, is not directed by any guidelines, rules or regulations. if this is the position, the university has necessarily to act with promptitude and frame, forthwith, appropriate regulations, providing for evaluation of dissertations of ll.m. students, pursuing their ll.m. courses under its aegis. else ..... the teaching quality or regularity of respondent no.5. 21. mr. singh had, during the course of his submissions, referred to regulation 9.6 of the university grants commission (minimum w.p.(c) 3033/2018 page 14 of 19 standards and procedure) regulation 2016 (hereinafter referred to as 2016 regulation ) which deals with ..... of ll.m. without having any experience of teaching ll.m course and research experience. 20. to these, the response, in the counter affidavit of the university, is as under : 5. that in furtherance to the aforesaid reason, the... petitioner has also challenged the appointment of respondent no.5 as his examiner for .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... facts of the said cases and that the matter would have to be decided on the facts of each case without any universal generalisation.21. hardip singh v. state of punjab, (2008) 8 scc557concerned a prosecution under the ndps act. the contention was that the inspector, pw5 being the complainant himself would be an interested person and should not have been ..... the madras high court in balasundaran v. state, 1999 (113) elt785(mad.), which held that the person who had searched the investigating officer. in naushad v. state of kerala, 2000 (1) klt (vi) 785, it was categorically held by a learned single judge of the kerala high court, in a case relating to the the appellants could not be ..... investigation other conducting entire to that no 26. a similar view has been taken in shri fayas ali v. state of mizoram crl. appeal no.26 of 2013 (j) dated 19.09.2013, relating to prosecution under the ndps act, by the gauhati high court as follows: from the evidence of pws 1 and 4, it is clearly found that the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... facts of the said cases and that the matter would have to be decided on the facts of each case without any universal generalisation.21. hardip singh v. state of punjab, (2008) 8 scc557concerned a prosecution under the ndps act. the contention was that the inspector, pw5 being the complainant himself would be an interested person and crl.a. 39/ ..... , it causes miscarriage of justice to accused qua fair investigation. the kerala high court 28. a single judge of in naushad v. state of kerala, 2000 (1) klt785 relating to the ndps act held as follows: in a case of this nature, when the complainant himself is a police official, the investigation should have been conducted by his top ..... investigation other conducting entire to that no 26. a similar view has been taken in shri fayas ali v. state of mizoram crl. appeal no.26 of 2013 (j) dated 19.09.2013, relating to prosecution under the ndps act, by the gauhati high court as follows: from the evidence of pws 1 and 4, it is clearly found that .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... of the said cases and that the matter would have to be decided on the facts of each case without any universal generalisation.21. hardip singh v. state of punjab, 2008 (8) scc557concerned a prosecution under the ndps act. the contention was that the inspector, pw5 being the complainant himself would be an interested person and should not have ..... , it causes miscarriage of justice to accused qua fair investigation." 28. a single judge of the kerala high court in naushad v. state of kerala, 2000 (1) klt785 relating to the ndps act held as follows: the previous this nature, when the ... in a case of complainant himself is a police official, the investigation should have been conducted ..... justice to accused qua fair investigation." 26. a similar view has been taken in shri fayas ali vs. state of mizoram crl. appeal no.26 of 2013 (j) dated 19.09.2013, relating to prosecution under the ndps act, by the gauhati high court as follows: from the evidence of pws 1 and 4, it is clearly found that .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... charitable cause of the assessee. it may also be pointed out that the assessee has applied substantial amount in setting up of "patanjali university", a deemed university set up under the university of patanjali act, inter-alia, for having courses in m.a. {yoga science), m.sc. (yoga science), b.a. in panchkarma, post ..... ld. ar submitted that during the year the appellant had applied substantial amount on construction of the ayurveda medical college which is affiliated to the uttarakhand technical university. it was submitted that ayurveda medical college set up by the appellant was approved and duly recognized by the department of ayurveda, yoga & naturopathy, unani ..... graduate diploma in yoga science and post graduate diploma in yoga health and cultural tourism. it has also been informed that the university has become operational on september, .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... following statements is incorrect regarding union budget 2015-2016: 1. 5 more aiims in jammu and kashmir, punjab, tamil nadu, himachal pradesh, bihar and assam, 2. university of disability studies will be established in kerala, 3. 150 crore allotted for atal innovation mission, 4. direct benefit transfer (dbt) will be further be expanded to ..... is only one, objective correct answer to every question. the system of multiple choice objective type test and scope and ambit of judicial review was examined in kanpur university scase (supra), and illuminated the following words: 18. fourthly, in a system of 'multiple choice objective- type test', care must be taken to see ..... unless the parties agree that the 1996 act shall apply in relation to proceedings which had commenced before the 1996 act was enforced. the challenge on this account must fail. 22. the last issue and question relates to the final order or direction which should be passed. in kanpur university(supra) in paragraph 18, the supreme .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... (prohibition of capitation fee, regulation of admission, fixation of nonexploitative fee and other measures to ensure equity and excellence) act, 2007 (in short delhi professional colleges act ) is not applicable to the respondent university.8. i may at the outset state that a plain reading of the clause aforesaid in the brochure published by ..... of defence vide letter dated 3rd june, 1994 to the chief secretaries of all states / union territories though confirming that education is a state subject and universities are autonomous bodies, recommended standardization of preference for admission in defence quota, to bring about uniformity in the states and union territories and further prescribed the ..... force only and not the police force. reliance in this regard may be placed on akhilesh prasad vs. union territory of mizoram (1981) 2 scc150and sukhdev singh gill vs. state of punjab (2000) 8 scc492 12. the same also in my view, could not have led the petitioner into believing that she was .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... district of himachal pradesh, andaman and nicobar islands or lakshadweep essential: (i) 10+2 in science subjects from a recognized university or board. (ii) diploma in medical laboratory technology from an institute recognized by the all india council of technical education or any other statutory body authorised ..... date for determining the age limit shall be the closing date for receipt application from candidates in index (and not the closing date prescribed for in assam, mizoram, manipur, nagaland, meghalaya, arunachal pradesh, tripura, sikkim, ladakh division of jammu and kashmir state, lahaul and spirit districts and pangi sub division of chamba ..... time when the candidatures for promotions were to be considered, the rules were amended - effectively blocking all their chances of promotion. the cat, therefore, acted within its powers in holding that the amendments were arbitrary.6. as is evident from the rules extracted above, the union of w.p.(c)12289 .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... district of himachal pradesh, andaman and nicobar islands or lakshadweep essential: (i) 10+2 in science subjects from a recognized university or board. (ii) diploma in medical laboratory technology from an institute recognized by the all india council of technical education or any other statutory body authorised ..... date for determining the age limit shall be the closing date for receipt application from candidates in index (and not the closing date prescribed for in assam, mizoram, manipur, nagaland, meghalaya, arunachal pradesh, tripura, sikkim, ladakh division of jammu and kashmir state, lahaul and spirit districts and pangi sub division of chamba ..... time when the candidatures for promotions were to be considered, the rules were amended - effectively blocking all their chances of promotion. the cat, therefore, acted within its powers in holding that the amendments were arbitrary.6. as is evident from the rules extracted above, the union of w.p.(c)12289 .....
Tag this Judgment!