Court : Punjab State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Chandigarh
..... roll no. whereas the son of the complainant deliberately absented from the examination. the son of the complainant is average student and had been absenting from the university examination. the respondent did not receive any notice dated 11.9.2008 or the same was replied. the respondent was neither expelled nor thrown out the complainant from ..... wherein it was held that matter of admission, fees etc. cannot be a question of deficiency in service and barred to entertain the consumer dispute under the consumer protection act, 1986. he has also relied upon honble supreme court in bihar school examination board versus suresh prasad sinha? as well as p.t. koshy and anr. v ..... only, who filed written statement taking preliminary objections that there is no deficiency in service on the part of the respondents, the complainant is estopped by his act and conduct to file the complaint as he himself is not appearing in the semester examinations and he has got no cause of action or locus-standi to .....
Tag this Judgment!