Skip to content


Misinterpret - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: misinterpret Year: 2001 Page 1 of about 103 results (0.007 seconds)
Jun 30 2001 (HC)

B.L. and Co. and Others Vs. Pfizer Products Incl.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jun-30-2001

Reported in: 93(2001)DLT346

..... 1908 for vacation or variation of ex parte order in case of any concealment or willful misinterpretation however the pendency of the matter before the single judge would not preclude the right .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 08 2001 (SC)

All India Judges Association and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Feb-08-2001

Reported in: AIR2002SC1752; 2002(3)ALD39(SC); 2002(4)ALT41(SC); 2002(2)AWC395(SC); 2002(2)BLJR1144; 2002(5)BomCR242; [2002(93)FLR628]; (2002)3GLR2017; [2002(2)JCR248(SC)]; JT2002(3)SC50

..... order of the district judge since he had failed to exercise his jurisdiction on a misinterpretation of the statute and erroneous view of limitation joy chand lal babu v kamalaksha choudhury .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 12 2001 (SC)

All India Sc and St Employees Assn. and anr. Etc. Vs. A. Arthur Jeen a ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Apr-12-2001

Reported in: AIR2001SC1851; [2001(89)FLR1051]; JT2001(5)SC42; 2001LabIC1726; 2001(3)SCALE378; (2001)6SCC380; [2001]2SCR1183; 2001(3)SLJ84(SC)

..... order of the district judge since he had failed to exercise his jurisdiction on a misinterpretation of the statute and erroneous view of limitation joy chand lal babu v kamalaksha choudhury .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 18 2001 (HC)

Vinay Kumar Agarwal Vs. 17th Addl. District Judge, Allahabad and Other ...

Court: Allahabad

Decided on: Apr-18-2001

Reported in: 2001(2)AWC1531

..... the conclusions are based on misreading of the evidence or misinterpreting the documents or the findings arrived at are perverse in ..... at finding on the basis of inadmissible evidence or by misinterpreting the documents or is perverse or it took into consideration ..... taken a wholly erroneous view of the matter misreading or misinterpreting the evidence and has not correctly applied the law its .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 28 2001 (HC)

Ramlayak Ram and anr. Vs. Umrawati Devi and ors.

Court: Patna

Decided on: Aug-28-2001

..... just by a jerk received from the air pressure is remote the learned tribunal therefore misinterpreted the entire evidence on record it is unfortunate that he failed to apply his judicial ..... by the cycle on account of the air pressure thus he has misinterpreted the word jhatka and he has also misinterpreted the meaning of word jerk jerk and jhatka both will indicate .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 13 2001 (HC)

Wine Shop Through Partner Kalindi P. Malhotra Vs. State of Gujarat and ...

Court: Gujarat

Decided on: Dec-13-2001

Reported in: (2002)4GLR3071

..... dated 29 6 1988 was not on merits and the criminal proceedings were withdrawal on misinterpretation of law and the show cause notice dated 14 6 2000 was issued by the ..... of the pending criminal case against the petitioner was made by the state government on misinterpretation or misconception of law a review petition could have been filed before the concerned court .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 28 2001 (HC)

Ramlayak Ram and ors. Vs. Umrawati Devi and ors.

Court: Patna

Decided on: Aug-28-2001

..... by the cycle on account of the air pressure thus he has misinterpreted the word jhatka and he has also misinterpreted the meaning of word jerk jerk and jhatka both will indicate .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 02 2001 (HC)

Rajasthan State Electricity Board Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Mar-02-2001

Reported in: 2002ACJ992; AIR2001Bom310; 2001(3)ALLMR400; 2001(4)BomCR239; (2001)4BOMLR725; 2001(3)MhLj479

..... the commencement of the central excises and customs laws amendment act 1991 or thereafter by misinterpreting or misapplying the provisions of the central excises and salt act 1944 read with central ..... excise tariff act 1985 or customs act 1962 read with customs tariff act or by misinterpreting or misapplying any of the rules regulations or notifications issued under the said enactments such .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 24 2001 (HC)

M. Shyam Sunder and ors. Vs. Government of A.P. and ors.

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Aug-24-2001

Reported in: 2001(6)ALD87; 2002(5)ALT454; 93(2001)DLT74

..... therefore the government cannot be allowed to turnaroundand defeat the claims of the petitioners by misinterpreting the directions issued in wp no 5834 of 1994 dated 23 7 1999 the government ..... purpose of this discussion suffice it to say that placingreliance on rule 33 a by misinterpreting the directions issued by the tribunal in oa nos 41796 97 of 1998 is arbitrary .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 28 2001 (HC)

Gujarat Steel Tubes Ltd. Vs. Board of Trustees of Port of Kandla and a ...

Court: Gujarat

Decided on: Dec-28-2001

Reported in: AIR2002Guj173; (2002)2GLR934

..... the commencement of the central excises and customs laws amendment act 1991 or thereafter by misinterpreting or misapplying the provisions of the central excises and salt act 1944 read with central ..... excise tariff act 1985 or customs act 1962 read with customs tariff act or by misinterpreting or misapplying any of the rules regulations or notifications issued under the said enactments such .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //