Misinterpret - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: misinterpret Year: 2001 Page 1 of about 103 results (0.007 seconds)B.L. and Co. and Others Vs. Pfizer Products Incl.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-30-2001
Reported in: 93(2001)DLT346
..... 1908 for vacation or variation of ex parte order in case of any concealment or willful misinterpretation however the pendency of the matter before the single judge would not preclude the right .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAll India Judges Association and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Feb-08-2001
Reported in: AIR2002SC1752; 2002(3)ALD39(SC); 2002(4)ALT41(SC); 2002(2)AWC395(SC); 2002(2)BLJR1144; 2002(5)BomCR242; [2002(93)FLR628]; (2002)3GLR2017; [2002(2)JCR248(SC)]; JT2002(3)SC50
..... order of the district judge since he had failed to exercise his jurisdiction on a misinterpretation of the statute and erroneous view of limitation joy chand lal babu v kamalaksha choudhury .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAll India Sc and St Employees Assn. and anr. Etc. Vs. A. Arthur Jeen a ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Apr-12-2001
Reported in: AIR2001SC1851; [2001(89)FLR1051]; JT2001(5)SC42; 2001LabIC1726; 2001(3)SCALE378; (2001)6SCC380; [2001]2SCR1183; 2001(3)SLJ84(SC)
..... order of the district judge since he had failed to exercise his jurisdiction on a misinterpretation of the statute and erroneous view of limitation joy chand lal babu v kamalaksha choudhury .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTVinay Kumar Agarwal Vs. 17th Addl. District Judge, Allahabad and Other ...
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Apr-18-2001
Reported in: 2001(2)AWC1531
..... the conclusions are based on misreading of the evidence or misinterpreting the documents or the findings arrived at are perverse in ..... at finding on the basis of inadmissible evidence or by misinterpreting the documents or is perverse or it took into consideration ..... taken a wholly erroneous view of the matter misreading or misinterpreting the evidence and has not correctly applied the law its .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRamlayak Ram and anr. Vs. Umrawati Devi and ors.
Court: Patna
Decided on: Aug-28-2001
..... just by a jerk received from the air pressure is remote the learned tribunal therefore misinterpreted the entire evidence on record it is unfortunate that he failed to apply his judicial ..... by the cycle on account of the air pressure thus he has misinterpreted the word jhatka and he has also misinterpreted the meaning of word jerk jerk and jhatka both will indicate .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTWine Shop Through Partner Kalindi P. Malhotra Vs. State of Gujarat and ...
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Dec-13-2001
Reported in: (2002)4GLR3071
..... dated 29 6 1988 was not on merits and the criminal proceedings were withdrawal on misinterpretation of law and the show cause notice dated 14 6 2000 was issued by the ..... of the pending criminal case against the petitioner was made by the state government on misinterpretation or misconception of law a review petition could have been filed before the concerned court .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRamlayak Ram and ors. Vs. Umrawati Devi and ors.
Court: Patna
Decided on: Aug-28-2001
..... by the cycle on account of the air pressure thus he has misinterpreted the word jhatka and he has also misinterpreted the meaning of word jerk jerk and jhatka both will indicate .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRajasthan State Electricity Board Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Mar-02-2001
Reported in: 2002ACJ992; AIR2001Bom310; 2001(3)ALLMR400; 2001(4)BomCR239; (2001)4BOMLR725; 2001(3)MhLj479
..... the commencement of the central excises and customs laws amendment act 1991 or thereafter by misinterpreting or misapplying the provisions of the central excises and salt act 1944 read with central ..... excise tariff act 1985 or customs act 1962 read with customs tariff act or by misinterpreting or misapplying any of the rules regulations or notifications issued under the said enactments such .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM. Shyam Sunder and ors. Vs. Government of A.P. and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-24-2001
Reported in: 2001(6)ALD87; 2002(5)ALT454; 93(2001)DLT74
..... therefore the government cannot be allowed to turnaroundand defeat the claims of the petitioners by misinterpreting the directions issued in wp no 5834 of 1994 dated 23 7 1999 the government ..... purpose of this discussion suffice it to say that placingreliance on rule 33 a by misinterpreting the directions issued by the tribunal in oa nos 41796 97 of 1998 is arbitrary .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGujarat Steel Tubes Ltd. Vs. Board of Trustees of Port of Kandla and a ...
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Dec-28-2001
Reported in: AIR2002Guj173; (2002)2GLR934
..... the commencement of the central excises and customs laws amendment act 1991 or thereafter by misinterpreting or misapplying the provisions of the central excises and salt act 1944 read with central ..... excise tariff act 1985 or customs act 1962 read with customs tariff act or by misinterpreting or misapplying any of the rules regulations or notifications issued under the said enactments such .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial