Misinterpret - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: misinterpret Year: 1998 Page 1 of about 63 results (0.006 seconds)State of Bihar and ors. Vs. Steel City Beverages Ltd. and anr.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Nov-18-1998
Reported in: 1998VIIIAD(SC)371; AIR1998SC235; 1999(1)BLJR10; [1999]235ITR131(SC); JT1998(8)SC49; (1999)IIMLJ15(SC); 1998(6)SCALE184; (1999)1SCC10; [1998]Supp3SCR5; [1999]112STC185(SC)
..... word plant and did not include within its meaning land building and machinery high court misinterpreted word plant in rule 2 v order of high court set aside appeal allowed indian .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSmt. Bhagmaniya Devi Vs. State of U.P. and Others</B>
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Sep-02-1998
Reported in: 1999(1)AWC271
..... that the action ofthe respondents were deliberate andfor which they had themselves misinterpreted the rules to suit their ownpurpose the misinterpretation is soapparent on the face of it that thiscourt has no .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAman Coke Plant (P), Limited Vs. State of Bihar and ors.
Court: Patna
Decided on: Mar-26-1998
..... the commencement of the central excises and customs laws amendment act 1991 or thereafter by misinterpreting or misapplying the provisions of the central excises and salt act 1944 read with central ..... excise tariff act 1985 or customs act 1962 read with customs tariff act or by misinterpreting or misapplying any of the rules regulations or has necessarily to be preferred under and .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSatya Prakash Vs. Special Judge (E.C. Act), Agra and Others
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: May-04-1998
Reported in: 1998(3)AWC1876
..... of the parties or misreading of evidence on record or without application of mind or misinterpretation of law then a finding would stand vitiated in the eye of law and would ..... the trial court arrived at a finding on the basis of inadmissible evidence or by misinterpreting the document or is perverse or it took consideration irrelevant material on the record then .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThe Sangli Bank Ltd. Vs. Kanishka Investments Pvt. Ltd. and Others
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Nov-19-1998
Reported in: 1999(1)ALLMR556; 1999(1)BomCR660
..... and it was charged in excess they tried to contend that it was due to misinterpretation of the circulars at branch level that the bank charged incorrect interest this is an ..... plaintiffs in the suit before the consumer dispute redressal forum if the plaintiffs officers could misinterpret and misread the circulars of r b i and nabard and if inspite of acquiring .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM/S. N.G.E.F. Limited Bangalore Vs. the Collector of Customs (Appeals) ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-10-1998
Reported in: 1998(104)ELT628(Kar); 1999(1)KarLJ247
..... the commencement of the central excises and customs laws amendment act 1991 or thereafter by misinterpreting or misapplying the provisions of the central excises and salt act 1944 read with central ..... excise tariff act 1985 or customs act 1962 read with customs tariff act or by misinterpreting or misapplying any of the rules regulations or notifications issued under the said enactments such .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTIn Re: Chandigarh Newsline (Indian Express Group)
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Jul-31-1998
Reported in: AIR1999SC144; 1998(2)ALT(Cri)244; 1999CriLJ27; JT1998(5)SC243; 1998(4)SCALE350; (1998)6SCC378; [1998]3SCR944
..... was announced or given by the apex court the original report was based on a misinterpretation of a communication received by the punjab government from r s sodhi additional advocate general ..... the possible repercussions on the pending matter before the apex court due to the inadvertent misinterpretation of the communication as aforesaid the error though grave was entirely unintentional and is deeply .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRangadhar Nayak Vs. Fertilizer Corporation of India Ltd. and ors.
Court: Orissa
Decided on: Aug-25-1998
Reported in: (1999)IIILLJ1280Ori
..... not considered by this court one of the contentions was that the reviewing authority had misinterpreted and misconstrued the earlier judgment of this court and had not applied its mind to ..... by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner one was that the reviewing authority had misinterpreted and misconstrued the earlier judgment of the high court and had not applied its mind .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPatel B.S. and ors. Vs. State of M.P. and ors.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-15-1998
Reported in: (2000)ILLJ587MP
..... the labour commissioner and other authorities the respondent nos 2 to 4 herein who have misinterpreted the government notifications issued from time to time and have made a demand for recovery .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBhola Nath Yadav Vs. Joint Director of Education and Another
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Feb-20-1998
Reported in: 1998(2)AWC1482
..... the facts of the present case the generosity of the court is liable to be misinterpreted as it may amount to putting a premium on dishonesty and sharp practice which on .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial