Minimum Subscription - Year 1995 - Judgments

Feb 22 1995 (HC)

Smt. Urmila Bharuka Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Feb-22-1995

Reported in: [1999]97CompCas16(Cal)

..... the reasoning underwriters including yourself is 109 numbers in respect of the requirement of a minimum subscription amount of 901 of the issue it is essential that the underwriters including yourself ..... underwriters the company will be able to submit formal application for listing only after getting minimum subscription of 90 per cent of the issue the underwriters to the above public issue .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 04 1995 (HC)

Smt. Urmila Bharuka Vs. Coventry Spring and Engineering Co. Ltd. and o ...

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Jan-04-1995

Reported in: [1997]88CompCas197(Cal)

..... the appellant petitioner that the company has not received a minimum subscription amount of 90 of the issue including development of underwriters ..... date of the first issue of the prospectus and the minimum subscription provided in the said prospectus has not been raised ..... the company including the plaintiff offered to the public for subscription by the company pursuant to the prospectus dated february .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 03 1995 (HC)

Peerless General Finance and Investment Co. Ltd. and anr. Vs. Reserve ...

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: May-03-1995

Reported in: [1996]85CompCas808(Cal)

..... be paid to a depositor and also provided a minimum rate of interest to be paid to a depositor who discontinues depositing subscriptions midway through the term of the certificate 124 it ..... no longer permissible for the petitioner company to transfer or utilise any portion of the subscriptions deposits received from the certificate holders for meeting the working capital requirements the petitioner .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 24 1995 (HC)

Maharashtra Shramik Sena Vs. Gabriel India Ltd. and Others

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Jul-24-1995

Reported in: [1995(71)FLR775]; (1996)ILLJ639Bom

..... stated facts as regards the relevant period and they spoke about non payment of the subscription fee to the petitioner during the relevant period thus the industrial court has rightly confined ..... filed by union challenging cancellation of its recognition membership of petition s union fall below minimum limit prescribed under section 11 no evidence was produced by petitioner to show that membership .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 28 1995 (HC)

Audit Bureau of Circulations Vs. Assistant Director of Income-tax.

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Apr-28-1995

Reported in: [1995]55ITD408(Mum)

next issue that whether the income of the assessee from subscription application fees and entrance fee is exigible to tax the

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 31 1995 (SC)

M/S. Rishyashringa Jewellery Ltd. and Another Vs. the Stock Exchange, ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Oct-31-1995

Reported in: AIR1996SC480; (1996)1CALLT60(SC); [1996]85CompCas479(SC); JT1995(7)SC602; 1995(6)SCALE177; (1995)6SCC714; [1995]Supp4SCR579; 1996(1)LC120(SC)

in terms of this prospectus the date of closing the subscription mentioned in the prospectus was 19 7 1994 the period

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 17 1995 (TRI)