Minimum Subscription - Judgment Search Results

R.K. Garg and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: (1981)25CTR(SC)406; [1982]133ITR239(SC); (1981)4SCC675; [1981]1SCR947; 1982(14)LC12(SC)

..... penalties if it can be discovered independently of the fact of subscription to or acquisition of special bearer bonds the only protection given ..... bonds is a severely restricted immunity and this is the bare minimum immunity necessary in order to induce holders of black money to ..... taken care to see that such abuses are reduced to the minimum if not eliminated altogether 21 it is true that certain .....

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Chitpur Pressing Co. (P.) Ltd.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: [1982]133ITR426(Cal)

was received by the assessee according to the revenue the subscriptions to the association have already been allowed as deduction from

Jannet Chit Funds Pvt. Ltd. (In Liqn), Madras Vs. M.N. Ethirajan and o ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: AIR1982Mad133

stipulates that even though the suit may be for unrealised subscriptions by a defaulting prized subscriber the suit shall ails if

Pritam Singh Gill Vs. State of Punjab and ors.

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: AIR1982P& H228

now it would be plain that if the condition of subscription to the share capital or guarantee for payment is not

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Indian Jute Mills Association

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: (1981)23CTR(Cal)198,[1982]134ITR68(Cal)

our present purpose from its members whether by way of subscription or otherwise falls short of the expenditure incurred by such

Sir Shadilal Sugar and General Mills Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-t ...

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: (1982)27CTR(All)101; [1981]132ITR666(All); [1982]9TAXMAN175(All)

stop incurring further loss as the money with which the subscription to the bonds were made had been borrowed at 10

California Med. Assn. Vs. Fec

Court: US Supreme Court

calpac the act defines contribution broadly to include any gift subscription loan advance or deposit of money or anything of value

Satish Kumar Vs. Punjab State Co-operative Bank Ltd., Chandigarh and o ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: AIR1981P& H282; (1981)IILLJ256P& H

is rs 264 05 lakhs out of which the government subscription is rs 82 83 lakhs the learned counsel has argued

Sanchaita Investments and ors. Vs. State of West Bengal and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: AIR1981Cal157

of subscriptions collected column 8 has the heading amount of subscriptions forfeited column 9 is described as amount of subscriptions he

Jamnagar Motor Truck Owners Vs. Income Tax Officer.

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Ahmedabad

Reported in: (1982)2ITD402(Ahd.)

and does no business with any of its members the subscriptions received by it from its members cannot therefore be charged