Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: metro railways amendment act 2009 section 6 amendment of section 1 Court: chhattisgarh Page 22 of about 215 results (1.747 seconds)

Amarjit Singh Vs. Jasjit Singh

Court : Chhattisgarh

..... its jurisdiction, the magistrate is required to inquire either by himself or direct an investigation to be made by a police officer. the legislature has amended section 202 of the code vide act 25 of 2005 and has used the word `shall' in case of accused residing at a place beyond the area in which the magistrate exercises ..... the notice. complaint made by the respondent has been supported by evidence on affidavit as required and permissible under section 145 of the act.8. section 202 of the code has been amended vide act 25 of 2005 with effect from 23-6-2006 relating to inquiry/investigation and in case of accused residing beyond the area in which ..... to the court situate at raipur for taking cognizance of the offence punishable under section 138 of the act. learned counsel further argued that act 25 of 2005 came into force with effect from 23-6-2006 and according to this amended provision, the magistrate taking cognizance of the offence on the basis of complaint is under obligation to .....

Omprakash Dubey Vs. Kapuri Bai and Others

Court : Chhattisgarh

..... trustee or towards the members whom he stoods in such capacity. as per pleading of the original plaintiff radhikacharan dubey the property was self-acquired property, therefore, subsequent amendment in the plaint by the respondents that it was joint hindu family property was not permissible under order 22 rule 3 of the code. learned counsel contended that ..... in respect of any property held benami in terms of sub-section (1) of section 4 of the act, 1988. 22. in terms of order 22 rule 3 (1) of the code, the present respondents were not entitled to amend their plaint or make claim other than the claim of original plaintiff. as per pleading of the plaintiff ..... the appellant was benamidar and suit was not maintainable in terms of section 4 (1) and section 3 (a) and (b) of the act, 1988. 23. consequently, substantial question of law .....

Suresh Darvade Vs. Arjun Ram Pandey

Court : Chhattisgarh

Reported in : AIR2010Chh40

..... is admittedly a brother of the deceased is entitled to succeed if there be no other preferential heir.9. thus provision contained in section 26 of hindu succession act is the only provision dealing with the right of succession of children born to a convert after the conversion, however this provision does not disqualify the convert ..... of the converts who are born to the convert after such conversion from inheriting the property of any of their hindu relatives. section 28 of the present act discards almost all the grounds which imposed exclusion from inheritance and lays down that no person shall be disqualified from succeeding to any property on the ground of ..... recover the possession of the suit land from defendant no. 2. the trial court, while answering issue no. 10 has categorically recorded the finding that the plaintiffs act of embracing islam religion would not disentitle him to succeed to the property of his father.5. the first appellate court has confirmed all the findings recorded by .....

Hermit Singh Sethi Vs. B.M.W. India Private Limited and Others

Court : Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur

..... . 2004 (2) scc 278." 28. in rita bhalla vs. tata motors, marketing and customer support and anr. 2014 (1) cpr 240 (nc), hon'ble national commission observed that consumer protection act, 1986 sections 15, 17, 19 and 21 automobile manufacturing defect district forum directed ops to get vehicle repaired all defects mentioned in expert report, free of cost, deliver vehicle to ..... . o.p.nos.1 to 3 did not properly give response and the vehicle was not repaired timely and the approach of the ops are casual and due to negligent act of the ops, the complainant suffered lot of mental agony and the ops had given false assurance to the complainant that the vehicle would be handed over to him after ..... r.s. sharma, president: 1. the complainant has filed this complaint under section 17 of the consumer protection act, 1986 against the opposite parties for seeking direction to the opposite parties : (a) to pay the price of the b.m.w. rs.35,80,309/-, (b) to pay interest .....

Dayashankar and Others Vs. Jaishankar Since Deceased Through His Legal ...

Court : Chhattisgarh

..... will was duly executed by the testator or considers the existence of such fact so probable that any prudent person ought, under the circumstances of that particular case, to act upon the supposition that the will was duly executed by the testator, then the factum of execution of will shall be said to have been proved. the delicate structure ..... permits a document to be proved by leading secondary evidence. 12. the burden of proof that the will has been validly executed in terms of section 63 of the act of 1925 and is a genuine document is on the propounder. the propounder is further required to remove the suspicion by leading sufficient and cogent evidence, if there exists ..... the testator; mere presence of both the witnesses is not sufficient to discharge the burden laid upon the propounder of the will by section 63 (c) of the act of 1925 unless it is proved that each of them had seen the testator signing the will and thereafter had also put their signature either conjointly or separately in .....