Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: metal corporation nationalisation and miscellaneous provisions act 1976 section 25 repeal of ordinance and saving Page 1 of about 11 results (0.080 seconds)

Feb 02 1977 (HC)

Jialal Kapoor Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 1977WLN61

..... the high court under article 226 of the constitution was not assailed before us.3. it was, however, urged that after the nationalisation of the metal corporation by the metal corporation (nationalisation and miscellaneous provisions) act, 1976, the petitioner acquired statutory status and was entitled to a declaration of being in employment when ..... and enforced by or against the central government or the government company.9. the appellant has, therefore, not acquired any statutory status under the metal corporation (nationalisation and miscellaneous provisions act, 1976 and his cause of action, if any, is against the government company viz, the hindustan zinc limited, which ..... the government company being a non-statutory body, no writ petition was maintainable for enforcement, of am contractual lights. the enactment of the metal corporation (nationalisation and miscellaneous provisions( act, 1976 does not bring about am substantial change in the status of the appellant section 14 of the act .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 24 2002 (HC)

Hindustan Zinc Ltd. Vs. Dy. Cit

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : (2004)88TTJ(NULL)1045

..... the notification reads as under :'s.o. 526(e)-in exercise of the powers conferred on it by sub-section 1 of section 9 of the metal corporation (nationalisation and miscellaneous provisions) ordinance, 1976 (no. 12 of 1976), the central government being satisfied that hindustan zinc ltd., a government company, is willing ..... fresh ordinance dated 2-8-1976 was thereafter issued and subsequently replaced by another act of parliament, the metal corporation (nationalisation and miscellaneous provisions) act, 1976. the act provided for the taking over of metal corporation's management and the subsequentacquisition of the undertaking so as to enable the central government to, in order ..... all by the commissioner (appeals).the facts of the case are as follows :(a) the government of india acquired m/s metal corporation ltd. through special legislation, viz. the metal corporation of india (acquisition of undertaking) act, 1965 with effect from 22-10-1965.(b) holdings of the acquired company comprised:(i .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 27 2010 (HC)

P. Paliwal and ors. Vs. Hindustan Zinc Limited and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

..... looked into the background in which the company was formed as well as considered the provisions of metal corporation of india (acquisition of undertaking) act, 1965 and metal corporation of india (acquisition of undertaking) act, 1966 and metal corporation (nationalization and misc. provisions) act, 1976. the learned single judge observed that after re-acquisition ..... 5th april, 2010. the object of the company says as under: -to acquire, take over, manage and develop the undertaking formerly belonging to the metal corporation of india limited which shall be deemed to include all assets, rights, lease holds, including mining leases, if any, powers, authorities and privileges and ..... and interests arising out of such property as were immediately before the 22nd day of october, 1965 in the ownership, possession, power or control of metal corporation of india limited in relation to the undertaking, whether within or outside india, and all books of account, registers, maps, plans, sections, drawings .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 18 2021 (SC)

National Confederation Of Officers Association Of Central Public Secto ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... & 2 herein from disinvesting the residual shareholding of the govt. of india to the extent of 29.5% in the respondent no.4 without amending the metal corporation (nationalisation and miscellaneous provisions) act, 1976, (ii) direct the central bureau of investigation to file status report in this hon ble court from time to time ..... 9 judge of the calcutta high court on 1 april 1969 on the ground of res judicata. 5 on 2 august 1976, the president promulgated the metal corporation (nationalisation and miscellaneous provisions) ordinance. this ordinance was replaced by act no.100 of 1976, on 7 september 1976. 6 the union government took steps for ..... . according to the petitioners, hzl is not a loss incurring unit and the disinvestment does not sub-serve public interest. parliament acquired the undertaking by the metal corporation (nationalisation and 3 miscellaneous) provisions act 1976 . in pursuance of its acquisition, the undertaking came to be vested in a government company. hzl is stated to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 04 2008 (HC)

C.i.T. Vs. Ms. Hindustan Zinc Ltd.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : (2009)221CTR(Raj)639

..... section 7 of the 4 act thereof, meaning thereby, that till then, the entire undertaking continued to be the property of the metal corporation of india, notwithstanding this, since the metal corporation of india was deprived of the management and possession, as administrator was appointed, who had run the industry, during this intervening period, ..... and management.5. we may visualize the situation, that if the acquisition would not have gone through, or would have ultimately failed, even then, the metal corporation of india would have been entitled to compensation for the deprivation, obviously, in which event, the amount would not have been capable of being described as ..... the administrator may have earned profit, or may have incurred losses, but then, the fact does remain, that the metal corporation of india could not run the undertaking, and earn any income there from. as appears, that this factor which has been taken into consideration, and .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 10 1972 (SC)

The Neptune Assurance Co. Ltd., and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1973SC602; [1973]43CompCas469(SC); (1973)1SCC310; [1973]2SCR940

..... provisions. the purpose of the aforesaid legislative measures was to provide for the taking over in the public interest of the management of general insurance business pending nationalisation of such business. by general insurance business is meant under the act fire, marine or miscellaneous insurance business, whether carried on singly or in combination ..... general insurance business in india. section 2(9) of the insurance act defines "insurer" as (-a) any individual or unincorporated body of individuals or body corporate incorporated under the law of any country other than india, carrying on insurance business in india, or having his or its principal place of business or domicile ..... in india or employing a representative or maintaining a place of business in india with the object of obtaining insurance business (b) any body corporate incorporated under any law for the time being in force in india and carrying on business of insurance. there is yet another class of insurer, but .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 02 1995 (HC)

Luddur Algoo Yadav Vs. the General Manager, India United Mills and Oth ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : [1996(73)FLR1609]; (1998)IIILLJ166Bom

..... referred to as 'the act'). 2. the first respondent is a textile mill owned ask possessed by the national textile corporation (maharashtra north) limited to which the ownership of the textile mill was transferred as a result of these sick textile undertaking (nationalisation) act, 1974. 3. the petitioner was working in the service of the first respondent in its textile unit known .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 05 2003 (HC)

United India Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Mohanlal Aggarwal

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : 2004ACJ1657

..... accordance with the provisions of the insurance act, 1938. as per the proviso added in section 24a, with effect from 7th august 2002, the general insurance corporation, on and from the commencement of the general insurance business (nationalization) amendment act, 2002 ceased to carry on general insurance business, as noted above.14.3 ..... gic was notified as the 'indian re-insurer' in november 2000 and through administrative instructions, its supervisory role over subsidiaries was ended. (source : website of general insurance corporation of india - http://www.gicofindia.org/ about_us.html).14. the expression 'general insurance business' as defined in section 3(g) of the act of 1972, means ..... insured remains alive. it was also contended that the general insurance business was nationalized in the year 1972 from 2nd january 1973 and the general insurance corporation of india was to carry out its objectives under section 9 of the act. the act of 1972 bestowed an exclusive privilege to operate, on .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 05 2003 (HC)

United India Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Mohanlal Aggarwal

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : (2004)1GLR637; [2004]53SCL330(Guj)

..... act, 1938. as per the proviso added in section 24a, with effect from 7th august, 2002, the general insurance corporation, on and from the commencement of the general insurance business (nationalisation) amendment act, 2002 ceased to carry on general insurance business, as noted above.14.3 in this context, it was ..... 13. the entire general business in india was nationalised by the general insurance business (nationalisation) act, 1972. the government of india, through nationalisation, took over the shares of 55 indian insurance companies and the undertakings of 52 insurers carrying on general insurance business. general insurance corporation of india (g.i.c.) was formed ..... for the insurers (respondents in special civil application no. 9425 of 2002) contended that insurance business was on more concentrated in the hands of the nationalised insurance companies and therefore, the aspects which have a bearing on social security, such as, emanating from article 47 of the constitution read with .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 15 2004 (SC)

The State of West Bengal Vs. Kesoram Industries Ltd. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : (2004)187CTR(SC)219; [2004]266ITR721(SC); JT2004(1)SC375; 2004(1)SCALE425; (2004)10SCC201

..... this court and some high courts in a series of decisions.the matter may be considered from another angle. under the coking coalmines (nationalisation) act, 1972 and coal mines (nationalisation) act,1973, as noticed hereinbefore, all coking coal mines mentioned in theschedule appended to the 1972 act and all coal mines vested in ..... central government even furnishes guarantees tothe exporters of tea for export thereof to several countries. [see abiinternational ltd. and anr. v. export credit guarantee corporation of indialimited and ors.] of tea has been the subject matter of internationaltreaties.necessity of regulation of price and quality of coal and tea having regardto ..... means a house, outhouse, stable, latrine, urinal, shed,hut, wall (other than a boundary wall) or any other structure, whether ofmasonry, bricks, wood, mud, metal or other material but does not includeany portable shelter;""land" has been defined in section 2(24) as follows:"2(24) 'land' includes benefits to arise out of .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //