Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: metal corporation nationalisation and miscellaneous provisions act 1976 section 25 repeal of ordinance and saving Court: rajasthan

Jialal Kapoor Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 1977WLN61

..... the high court under article 226 of the constitution was not assailed before us.3. it was, however, urged that after the nationalisation of the metal corporation by the metal corporation (nationalisation and miscellaneous provisions) act, 1976, the petitioner acquired statutory status and was entitled to a declaration of being in employment when ..... and enforced by or against the central government or the government company.9. the appellant has, therefore, not acquired any statutory status under the metal corporation (nationalisation and miscellaneous provisions act, 1976 and his cause of action, if any, is against the government company viz, the hindustan zinc limited, which ..... the government company being a non-statutory body, no writ petition was maintainable for enforcement, of am contractual lights. the enactment of the metal corporation (nationalisation and miscellaneous provisions( act, 1976 does not bring about am substantial change in the status of the appellant section 14 of the act .....

Hindustan Zinc Ltd. Vs. Dy. Cit

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : (2004)88TTJ(NULL)1045

..... the notification reads as under :'s.o. 526(e)-in exercise of the powers conferred on it by sub-section 1 of section 9 of the metal corporation (nationalisation and miscellaneous provisions) ordinance, 1976 (no. 12 of 1976), the central government being satisfied that hindustan zinc ltd., a government company, is willing ..... fresh ordinance dated 2-8-1976 was thereafter issued and subsequently replaced by another act of parliament, the metal corporation (nationalisation and miscellaneous provisions) act, 1976. the act provided for the taking over of metal corporation's management and the subsequentacquisition of the undertaking so as to enable the central government to, in order ..... all by the commissioner (appeals).the facts of the case are as follows :(a) the government of india acquired m/s metal corporation ltd. through special legislation, viz. the metal corporation of india (acquisition of undertaking) act, 1965 with effect from 22-10-1965.(b) holdings of the acquired company comprised:(i .....

P. Paliwal and ors. Vs. Hindustan Zinc Limited and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

..... looked into the background in which the company was formed as well as considered the provisions of metal corporation of india (acquisition of undertaking) act, 1965 and metal corporation of india (acquisition of undertaking) act, 1966 and metal corporation (nationalization and misc. provisions) act, 1976. the learned single judge observed that after re-acquisition ..... 5th april, 2010. the object of the company says as under: -to acquire, take over, manage and develop the undertaking formerly belonging to the metal corporation of india limited which shall be deemed to include all assets, rights, lease holds, including mining leases, if any, powers, authorities and privileges and ..... and interests arising out of such property as were immediately before the 22nd day of october, 1965 in the ownership, possession, power or control of metal corporation of india limited in relation to the undertaking, whether within or outside india, and all books of account, registers, maps, plans, sections, drawings .....

C.i.T. Vs. Ms. Hindustan Zinc Ltd.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : (2009)221CTR(Raj)639

..... section 7 of the 4 act thereof, meaning thereby, that till then, the entire undertaking continued to be the property of the metal corporation of india, notwithstanding this, since the metal corporation of india was deprived of the management and possession, as administrator was appointed, who had run the industry, during this intervening period, ..... and management.5. we may visualize the situation, that if the acquisition would not have gone through, or would have ultimately failed, even then, the metal corporation of india would have been entitled to compensation for the deprivation, obviously, in which event, the amount would not have been capable of being described as ..... the administrator may have earned profit, or may have incurred losses, but then, the fact does remain, that the metal corporation of india could not run the undertaking, and earn any income there from. as appears, that this factor which has been taken into consideration, and .....