Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: merchant shipping amendment act 2007 section 4 amendment of section 31 Page 1 of about 34,766 results (0.503 seconds)

The National Union of Seafarers and Others Vs. the Director General of ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : AIR2000Bom333; 2000(3)ALLMR705; 2000(3)BomCR760

..... of government of india. the objects and reasons further sets out that as a prelude to depositing india's acceptance of the 1960 convention, it is necessary to amend the merchant shipping act, 1958 suitably. it is, therefore, clear that the amendment was brought out to be in conformity with the international convention for the safety of life at sea, 1960. the aim of the ..... introduced in 1966.what then was the object of the amendment. the statement of objects and reasons forms a part of the bill as introduced in the rajya sabha on 9th december, 1965. the statement of object and reasons sets out that the minimum standards laid down in the merchant shipping act, 1958 which merchant ships should comply with in the interest of safety of life .....

State Trading Corporation of India Ltd. Vs. Government of the People's ...

Court : Delhi

Reported in : AIR1997Delhi31; 1996(38)DRJ690

..... the amendment act deal with the repeal of the shipping development fund committee and consequential amendments in the principal act and the definitions. part v deals with registration of indian ..... iii deals with the appointments' of director general of shipping, surveyors, radio inspectors, seamens welfare offjcers, establishment and maintenance of mercantile marine department, shipping officers and seamens employment offices. part iv, consisting,of sections 14 to 19 of the act dealing with shipping development fund, stands repealed by the merchant shipping (amendment) act, 1986(act no. 66 of 1986). the amendment act consists of four chapters. chapters i to iv of .....

Syed Mohmmed Jamil Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Kolkata

..... . 6 with all particulars. but this was not properly done.6. since it was increasingly felt unjust and improper, there was need for amendment of section 95 of the merchant shipping act, 2002. in pursuant to the recommendation of the committee constituted by the government of india, ministry of surface transport, director-general of ..... of union of india. the seos were abolished from the year 1992 and no fresh registration had taken place from 1997. as per shipping merchant act amendment (2002) the scope of section 95 was amended and accordingly the seos were to regulate and to control all those manning agents and issued licenses. rules to regulate the manning agencies ..... part of the writ court to entertain the claim.21. it is true that mere availability of an alternative remedy, be it under the industrial dispute act or the merchant shipping act, 1958 cannot by itself close the doors of the writ court. maintainability and entertainability are not synonymous. in the event of existence of a legal .....

Union of India (Uoi) and ors. Vs. Forward Seamen Union and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : 2004(3)CHN509

..... office.17. the aforementioned recommendations have been accepted by the central government.18. therefore, the directions contained in the impugned judgment and order are contrary to the said act of 1958 as amended by the merchant shipping (amendment) act, 2002 and, therefore, are not sustainable in law.19. our attention has been drawn that the central government has not yet published the rules for the purpose ..... 1958 to enable the government of india or its agencies to give effect to those conventions and protocols.10. section 95 of the said act of 1958 has been amended by merchant shipping (amendment) act, 2002. such amendments were brought in to redefine the role of seamen's employment offices to control and regulate the manning agents and recruitment and placement service instead of controlling and regulating .....

Naresh Kumar and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2004SC2026; JT2004(5)SC394; 2004(4)SCALE214; (2004)4SCC540; 2004(3)SLJ1(SC)

..... relates to cos. no doubt section 80 of the act was holding the field before it was amended but it has eclipsed with the emergence of 1978 convention as amended by 1995 convention. with the emergence of 1995 convention there is no provision for indefinite continuance of cos in respect of the officers of the merchant ships. as already noticed, the petitioners are now serving ..... , medical fitness, training, qualification and examinations in accordance with the appropriate provisions. the 1978 convention was amended in 1995 and is known as stcw 1995. this 1995 convention extensively amended the 1978 convention but articles i-to xvii of 1978 convention remained unamended. consequently, the merchant shipping (stcw) rules, 1998 were also framed rule 11 inter alia requires that existing cos holders who intend .....

iCiCi Ltd. Vs. M.F.V. 'Shilpa' and Ors.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : AIR2002Bom371; 2002(2)ALLMR191; 2002(1)BomCR724; 2002(2)MhLj563

..... from 27th october, 1993- thus, act no. 68 of 1993 is a subsequent act enacted by the same legislature which enacted the d.r.t. act. by section 5 of the amending act, section 51 has been substituted. the original section ..... not be ousted because of the provisions of the d.r.t. act.9. it is to be seen that the d.r.t. act is enacted by the union parliament being act no. 51 of 1993 and it has come into force on 24th june, 1993. the merchant shipping act was extensively amended by the merchant shipping (amendment) act, 1993, no. 68 of 1993 and it has come into force .....

Dimitrios Paizis and ors. Vs. Motor Vessel nicos and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : AIR1983Bom178; (1983)85BOMLR250

..... ratified by india nor was any effect given to the same in its municipal laws, despite the fact that the first merchant shipping act, 1958 was enacted when the u.s. a by its 1954 amendment, and the english parliament by its 1956 judicature act, gave effect to those conventions.15. now in order to test the correctness of these submission advanced by mr. meghani ..... in admiralty was stabilised as it existed at the time stabilised as it existed at the time of the passing of that act.23. the english merchant shipping act, of 1854 was repealed and repealed by the merchant shipping act, 1894, subsequently followed by the merchant shipping act,, of 1897, 1906, 1921 and 1937, however, inasmuch as the jurisdiction of the bombay high court as an admiralty court was stabilised .....

Cdr. Anil Prabhakar Koshti and Others Vs. Union of India and Another

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2000(1)ALLMR146; 2000(1)BomCR781; 2000(2)MhLj198

..... the provisions relating to a certificate of service as they apply in relation to a certificate of competency.'6. section 80 was repealed by the merchant shipping (amendment) act, 1986 (no. 33 of 1986) with effect from 14th august 1987. several officers of the indian navy, who had attained the substantive rank of sub- ..... writ petition no. 783 of 1998, was commissioned in indian navy as sub-lieutenant on 1-1-1985.5. section 76 of the merchant shipping act, 1958 provides that everyindian ship, other than a home-trade ship of less than 200 tonnes grossengaged in coasting trade of india, when going to sea from any port or place,shall be provided with ..... application for getting the certificate and that the subsequent procedure prescribed to get delivery of the certificate under section 80(5) or (6) had been deleted by the amending act, 1987, but the right itself had not been annulled; that the right continued to be in existence and the certificate could be obtained by filing an application. .....

Ramanadan Chetti Vs. Nagooda Maracayar

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1898)ILR21Mad395

..... to the manner in which valid sales might be made was thereby altered. the case of ward v. beck 32 l.j.c.p. 113 however, which discussed this merchant shipping act amendment act quotes the judgment of wood, v.c. in the above case and approves it, and it must therefore be considered as a binding authority as to the manner in ..... with, i.e., a sale-deed has been executed and the transfer has been registered, and in which ease specific performance was refused. this case was followed by the merchant shipping act amendment act, 25 and 26 vict., c. 63, which by section 3 says that certain equities may be enforced and it was argued by the appellant's vakil that the law ..... claimed as damages.2. the plaintiff's case was that the defendant entered into a written agreement with him (through his agent) on the 21st july 1893 to purchase a ship belonging to the plaintiff for rs. 8,250 that, when rs. 3,250 of the purchase money had been paid in pursuance of the agreement, the defendant wrongfully obtained .....

Waterman S.S. Corp. Vs. United States

Court : US Supreme Court

..... by petitioner were delivered on february 27, 1946, and march 11, 1946, respectively, one just before and the other just after the date (march 8, 1946) of the merchant ship sales act of 1946, 60 stat. 41, as amended, 50 u.s.c.app. 1735 et seq. (1958 ed.), and thus were not chartered to the government before the ..... gave american citizens the right to purchase warbuilt ships from the united states as statutory sales prices which were substantially below the prices at which ..... 13,430,431 in charter hire to petitioner for the wartime use of these ships during the years 1942 through 1946, which amount petitioner reported in its federal income tax returns for those years. on march 8, 1946, congress enacted the merchant ship sales act of 1946, 60 stat. 41, as amended, 50 u.s.c.app. 1735 et seq. (1958 ed.), which .....