Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: merchant shipping amendment act 2007 section 4 amendment of section 31 Court: himachal pradesh Page 1 of about 154 results (0.085 seconds)

Todar Singh Vs. Jogeshwar and anr.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1972HP7

..... in a village had vested in the gram panchayat of the area. this act was further amended by the punjab village common lands (regulation) amendment act 1965 (punjab act no. 31 of 1965). by this amending act an amendment was introduced in the punjab village common lands (regulation) act 1961, as a result of which the whole of kangra district was included ..... that the hilly areas were exempt from the operation of the provisions of the punjab village common lands (regulation) act.14. clause (bb) of section 2 of the punjab village common lands (regulation) amendment act 1964 (punjab act 19 of 1964) lays down, what hilly area means. according to this. district kangra is also shown as ..... by defendant no. 2. it was contended that the land was shamilat, pasture land of the proprietors of tika kosri. the plaintiffs, therefore, claimed joint owner ship in their suit. the defendant no. 2 did not put in appearance despite service. defendant no. 1 resisted the claim pleading, inter alia, that he was .....

Sirmur Chemical and General Industries Ltd. Vs. the Union of India (Uo ...

Court : Himachal Pradesh

..... ) order, 1948, all laws in force in himachal pradesh or any part thereof before the commencement of the order were to continue in force until repealed or amended by a competent authority. it was not a case of a cession or annexation as is referred to in the three privy council decisions, discussed earlier. learned ..... working days of receiving notice and notify sellers. in the absence of any such notice from sellers, it shall be deemed that the goods have not been shipped and buyers shall exercise their option within 5 working days after expiration of extended date and notify sellers". it is common ground that the respondents delivered 2, ..... for the respondent invited my attention to halsbury's laws of england, volume vii (second edition), para 420, where, dealing with the question of assignment of liabilities by act of parties, the learned author observes : "by consent) of all parties, however, liability under a contract may be transferred so as to discharge the original contracting party .....

Union of India (Uoi) Vs. Wazir Chand and anr.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1962HP24

..... come to be read into the first column as if those words actually occurred therein, we are not of opinion, as at present advised, that the subsequent amendment of articles 158 and 178 must necessarily and automatically have the effect of altering the long acquired meaning of article 181 on the sole and simple ground that ..... . 17. in air 1949 mad 559, referred to above, the facts were as below:-- the appellant and respondent no. 1 were both yarn merchants and members of the madras yarn merchants' association. they lad subjected themselves as members to a set of arbitration bye-laws which laid down an elaborate procedure for the reference of disputes ..... the supreme court and the past history of the misapplication of the limitation act to such applications which are now covered by section 20 of the arbitration act. 6. articles 158 and 178 were amended by the arbitration act of 1940 and the words 'under the arbitration act 1940' were substituted for the words 'under the code of civil procedure .....

Union of India (Uoi) Vs. Sansar Chand and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1960HP1

..... in this connection, to the provisions of section 4 and 6 of the indian court fees act and of the himachal pradesh court fees (amendment) act, 1952. since the present appeal' was filed after the coming into force of the himachal pradesh (amendment) act, court-fees to the tune of rs. 1875/- were payable thereupon. reliance was placed upon ..... intention of evading payment of court-fees. the suit had been filed before the court fees (amendment) act came into force in himachal pradesh. when the present appeal was filed, learned counsel for the appellant overlooked the provisions of the amendment act.i have already referred to the fact that there is some interpolation in note no. 1 ..... mahajan for the respondents, on the other hand, took me, through the statements of m/s chaiju ram, janak raj, amar nath, shri niwas and raghubir das, cloth merchants of chamba (d. ws. 19, 20, 21, 23 and 25 respectively) and submitted that according to their testimony, five monthly quotas were not utilized i.e. allowed .....

Sunil Kuthiala Vs. Ajwesh Sood and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : 2006(2)ShimLC331

..... arguments. at this stage the plaintiffs filed an application under order vi rule 17 cpc read with section 40(2) of the specific relief act. by way of this application the plaint was sought to be amended and the petitioner in addition to the reliefs already claimed also sought the relief of damages to the extent of rs. 63,325/-. consequent ..... be just for including a stage claimed' contained in proviso to sub-section (2) of section 40 of the specific relief act leave no discretion with the court. the court cannot refuse the permission to the plaintiff to amend the plaint to include the claim for damages. in fact a claim for damages is inherent in a suit for perpetual ..... as may be just for including such claim.7. the language of section 40 of the specific relief act is very clear. it in no uncertain terms provides that if an amendment is sought for, the court must allow the same and the plaintiff can amend the plaint at any stage of the proceedings. section 40(2) of the specific relief .....

Khushi Ram and ors. Vs. the State of Himachal Pradesh and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1982HP97

..... year 1970 and a notification to this effect was published in the gazette dated 19th sept., 1970. it is stated that the object of the act stipulates to consolidate and amend the law relating to better regulation of purchase and sale, storage and processing of the agricultural produce and establishment of markets for agricultural produce in ..... a writ petition filed by shri gurbax singh and another of una district. it is stated that the petitioners carry on the trade of butchers, general merchants, milk sellers, grain merchants, and deal in vegetables and allied commodities of the daily need of the general public as retail and wholesale dealers. according to the petitioners, these ..... writ petition filed by shri surinder nath of main bazar una and another. it stated in the writ petition that the petitioner no. 1 is a 'karyana' merchant whereas petitioner no. 2 is a 'vanaspati' dealer, exclusively. according to the petitioners they sell the commodities which are not the products of the state of .....

Mohinder Pal Vs. State of H.P. and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1995HP15

..... submitted, and ably supported by shri gumaste, that after deletion of article 31 from the constitution with effect from june 20, 1979 by section 6 of constitution (44th amendment) act, 1978, the citizen has no right to claim compensation for deprivation of the property. it was urged that the right conferred on the holder of the property under ..... , one of which was that the whole of the sale proceeds of timber to the zamindars should go to the raja, while the sale proceeds of timber to merchants or contractors, the raja should pay one-fourth to govt. after some correspondence these proposals were sanctioned by govt. in carrying them out the deputy commissioner of kangra ..... of timber to zamindars, or other residents, at nominal prices, the whole of the income therefrom would go to the raja and in case of sale of timber to merchants or contractors, the raja would pay 1/4th of the income so realised into government treasury. (d) in case of continued mismanagement of the forests, the government .....

Dr. S.R. Mehrotra Vs. State of H.P. and anr.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1997HP51

..... the present impugned notification is concerned, at the lime when it wasissued, neither the court nor the academic council was in existence. section 11 of the amendment act, contains the transitory provisions. the section has already been extracted.42. there is no doubt whatever that at thelime when the notification was issued by theexecutive ..... tamper with the independent functioning of the university. according to the petitioner, the statement of the chief minister was belied by the provisions of the amendment' act. h is argued that the provisions in section 12 that the vice-chancellor shall be appointed by the chancellor in consultation with the state government would ..... and the academic council. in fact, the petitioner is challenging the validity of the said notification in this writ petition in addition to his challenging the amendment act itself.4. the petitioner filed another cwp no. 573/86 along with one dr. k.p. pandey. director, correspondence courscs-cum-professor of education .....

Bhupinder Singh and Etc. Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and Etc.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1986HP33

..... not taken away by the himachal pradesh passengers and goods taxation (amendment and extension) act, 1968. he has referred to section 10 of the said amendment act which is reproduced hereinunder for a ready reference :'10. repeal and savings.-- the punjab passengersand goods taxation act, 1952(16 of 1952) as applicable to the territories added ..... to himachal pradesh under section 5 of the punjab reorganisation act, 1966 (31 of 1968) and all ..... dt. simla-2, the 19th july, 1975,notification.in exercise of the powers conferred by section 10 of the himachal pradesh passengers and goods taxation act, 1955 (act no. 15of 1955), the governor of himachal pradesh is pleased to exempt the passengers carried in the tourist vehicles registered in any other state in india .....

Roshan Lal Kuthiala and anr. Vs. Raja Rana Yogendra Chandra and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1996HP14

..... limitation, the learned judge held that the transaction was one of deposit, covered by article 60 of the old limitation act of 1908 and the suit was, accordingly, covered by article 22 of the schedule attached to the amended limitation act. it was further held that even if it was believed that article 22 had no application to the facts of the ..... loan to the firm of lala roshan lal kuthiala. this witness stated that at that time he was personally present. he also stated that roshan lal was a timber merchant who had been sending the accounts to the plaintiff and his father.21. this is the oral evidence examined onbehalf of the plaintiff.22. the defendants examined for witnesses ..... is obligatory, as a matter of pleading, to show the ground on which the exemption from limitation is claimed and it was held that consequently, unless the plaint is amended, it would not be open to the parties to rely on an exemption not pleaded in the plaint.50. there is no doubt that under section 3 of the indian .....