Married Women S Property Act 1874 Section 9 - Judgment Search Results

Muslim Minority Front, Rep. by Its Secretary, Sri Mohd. Abdul Muqueet ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 1996(2)ALT30

requirements of fines and recoveries act 1883 which empowered a married woman to dispose of land by deed which she held was held to have been impliedly repealed by the married women s property act 1882 which authorised herein general terms to more than fifteen per cent of the total income of properties of all the wakfs in the state the state government envisaged not with standing such repeal anything done or any action taken under the said act shall be deemed to have of 1965 must behald to be a provision corresponding to section 11 4 of the act of 1959 our attention was issues already traversed by the parties in w a 401 95 and batch could possibly be agitated in the instant writ

Vasudev Pardasani Vs. Smt. Nirmala

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : II(1996)DMC309; 1996WLC(Raj)UC209; 1996(1)WLN661

1956 section 18 whereof lays down that the wife whether married before or after commencement of the act is entitled to separate maintenance and residence was regulated by the hindu married women s right to separate residence and maintenance act 1946 which so as to entail a forfeiture of her rights and property and deprive her of her right of inheritance from the hindu married women s right to separate residence and maintenance act 1946 which now stands repealed by section 29 of the delhi on january 17 1977 on a petition filed under section 13 of the hindu marriage act 1956 by the petitioner order of the civil court was also dismissed on august 9 1977 the petitioner remarried on may 18 1981 and is

Radhey Shyam and ors. Vs. Meera Devi and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : II(1997)DMC581; 1997(1)WLC567

7 12 1990 alleging herein that smt meera devi was married to shri ram avtar petitioner on 10 9 1978 according residence used to be once regulated by the hindu married women s right to separate residence act 1946 since repeated by hindu to maintain others is dependent upon his possessing the property of the family to which the persons entitled to maintenance undivided family property under sections 2 and 3 of that act left little for her to claim maintenance but since there reasons and was therefore not entitled to any maintenance under section 125 cr it is one of the cardinal principles of same order of the learned addl sessions judge dated april 9 1992 passed under section 397 cr p c whereby the

Ajit Singh Vs. Ramail Singh and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (1996)114PLR437

possession to the extent of 7 9 share in the property in dispute measuring 68 kanals 7 marias and that the in the name of the plaintiffs and kewal singh simply acted as a next friend if ultimately the present suit is suit land measuring 68 kanals 7 marlas the land measuring 9 kanals 2 marlas was earlier sold by smt bhago and

Dheer Singh and anr. Vs. Asst. Director of Income-tax and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : (1998)146CTR(All)681; [1998]230ITR343(All); [1997]90TAXMAN392(All)

estimating the undisclosed income including the income from the undisclosed property in a summary manner to the best of his judgment order or direction restraining respondent no 1 from taking any action with regard to the seized documents and assets ii to assets seized in the manner specified therein the said sub section 5 stands as under 5 where any money bullion jewellery the respondents be restrained from encashing other fixed deposit receipts 9 under sub section 5 of section 132 of the act

Yerraiahgari Venkatachalapathi Vs. Smt. Yerraiahgari Venkataramanna

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 1996(2)ALT(Cri)704; II(1996)DMC717

has been driven out of the house and that he married another lady and living with her the petitioner resisted that it is equally true that the high court should not act as a second revisional court under the garb of exercising it is equally true that the high court should not act as a second revisional court under the garb of exercising person from invoking the power of a high court under section 482 it is equally true that the high court should 125 1 cr p c in m c no 3 91 for granting maintenance alleging that she is the legally wedded

Chairman Sterlite Industries (India) Ltd. Vs. Deepak Gupta

Court : Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC New Delhi

appellant company the fact of lodgement of the debenture for transfer alongwith necessary transfer deeds etc had not been disputed with so within the statutory limit laid down in the companies act this clearly amounts to deficiency in service and accordingly we forum ii appeal dismissed with costs consumer protection act 1986 section 2 1 g comparative citation 1998 2 cpj 592

The State of West Bengal Vs. Nebulal Shaw

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : (1997)1CALLT302(HC)

the fact situation in such cases it is necessary to act with restraint and circumspection so that the process of the the fact situation in such cases it is necessary to act with restraint and circumspection so that the process of the certified copy of this order is applied for the criminal section is directed to deliver the same before the x mas much sore over the granting of bail dated 28 3 96 in the context the prayer for cancellation of bail has

Gurbachan Singh Vs. Bachan Singh and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (1997)115PLR355

civil procedure his client was not heard who purchased the property by virtue of registered sale deed and it is a or granted by the court for the doing of any act prescribed or allowed by this court the court may in appellant it is an admitted fact that the proceedings under section 148 of the code of civil procedure were contested notice the deposit of rs 1100 and vide order dated 13 9 1971 ex d 2 the sub judge ii class kaithal

P. Thangaraj and ors. Vs. the Commissioner, Madurai City Municipal Cor ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1996)2MLJ416

370 it is held that promotion of qualified juniors by transfer to higher category when seniors were not qualified cannot be the contention urged on behalf of the government that their action was in accord with the principles of natural justice the as lecturer hindi having regard to the prohibition contained in section 16 f he sought exemption as envisaged by section 16 and since the appellant had passed the test on 20 9 1981 he was given promotion and seniority was fixed with