Married Women S Property Act 1874 Section 9 - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: married women s property act 1874 section 9 Year: 1988 Page 1 of about 435 results (3.095 seconds)Commissioner of Income-tax/Wealth-tax Vs. Indumathi R. Kirloskar
Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Nov-18-1988
Reported in : ILR1990KAR893; 1988(3)KarLJ377
tribunal held that there cannot be a compulsion on a married woman who had given the property subject to restraint of also states that the same stood abolished after the married women s property act 1882 as it was considered unnecessary as brought to an end the beneficial interest in the trust property so that the interest of the successor would be accelerated that the proviso to section 58 of the indian trusts act was not attracted to the present case thus neither sections transfer and hence did not attract the prohibition contained in sections 56 and 58 of the indian trusts act 9 in s modern law of real property 11th edition at page 911 if property was given to a married woman by words
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTState (Delhi Administration) Vs. Giasa Ram
Court : Delhi
Decided on : Sep-27-1988
Reported in : 1989(1)Crimes49; 36(1988)DLT299
the offence under section 88 112 of the motor vehicles act after trial the learned metropolitan magistrate vide his judgment of the offence under section 88 112 of the motor vehicles act after trial the learned metropolitan magistrate vide his judgment of charanjit talwar j 1 giasa ram was tried under sections 279 and 338 of the indian penal code the allegations about 10 3j am he was driving truck no dll 9692 in the locality of rani bagh in such a manner
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTFateh Lal Vs. State of Rajasthan
Court : Rajasthan
Decided on : Jan-27-1988
Reported in : 1988WLN(UC)160
punishable under section 7 read with section 3 of the act and clause 3 of the rajasthan guest control order 1972 case under section 7 rule with section 3 of the act was registered and investigation was commenced he seized the food has committed an offence punishable under section 7 read with section 3 of the act and the rajasthan guest control order order of the learned additional sessions judge bhilwara dated october 9 1980 by which he confirmed the conviction of the accused
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCollector of C. Ex. Vs. General Engineering Servicing
Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on : May-17-1988
Reported in : (1989)(42)ELT86TriDel
the contention that the contracted house shed is an immovable property and that no duty is leviable on goods pertaining to the provisions of section 3 of central excises and salt act 1944 excise duty is leviable on goods produced or manufactured of levy of excise duty as per the provisions of section 3 of central excises and salt act 1944 excise duty
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKarta Vs. Financial Commissioner, Haryana and ors.
Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Jan-21-1988
Reported in : JT1988(1)SC155; 1988(1)SCALE117; 1988Supp(1)SCC468
her entire land to her daughter who sold the disputed property being a part of such land to the original applicants stage the interpretation of sections 9 and 9a of the act are really not of any avail to the appellant at the tenant has lost at every stage the interpretation of sections 9 and 9a of the act are really not of form k i under section 14a 1 read with section 9 1 i of the punjab security of land tenures act
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMadhavrao Jiwajirao ScIndia and ors. Vs. Sambhajirao Chandrojirao Angr ...
Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Feb-09-1988
Reported in : AIR1988SC709; 1988(36)BLJR292; (1988)90BOMLR108; 1988CriLJ853; 1988(1)Crimes780(SC); JT1988(1)SC279; 1988(1)SCALE261; (1988)1SCC692; [1988]2SCR930
in the bombay city constituted a part of the trust property russi homi awary and damodar rangrappa shenoy respondents in criminal upon the provisions of section 53 of the indian trust act which provides no trustee and no person who has recently evidence laid down by supreme court indian penal code 1890 sections 300 304 part i murder or culpable homicide circumstantial evidence june 1981 the said tenant surrendered the tenancy and on 9th of june 1981 the secretary issued a certificate to the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTR. Padma and ors. Vs. the Appropriate Authority, Income Tax Department ...
Court : Chennai
Decided on : Aug-09-1988
Reported in : (1989)2MLJ63
loss and that a member of the family is getting married and further they are interested in purchasing the property in for the government to realise amounts by sale of immovable property in spite of success in the writ petition fourth respondent known about the existence of chapter xx c in the act ought to have stipulated terms and conditions which would not though contingent vesting of the property had taken place under section 269ue when the central government had been prevented from paying have no relevance to the claims made by appellants herein 9 hence in matters of this nature whenever a stay order
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTS. Raman Vs. T. Pakirisamy Pathar
Court : Chennai
Decided on : Jan-08-1988
Reported in : (1989)1MLJ448
jurisdiction to deal with this matter under the rent control act 3 in order to ascertain whether the building is a jurisdiction to deal with this matter under the rent control act 3 in order to ascertain whether the building is a the structure in a permanent way 4 further as per section 21 of the tamil nadu buildings lease and rent control
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSivalingam Vs. Sakthivel, Rep. by His Power of Attorney Agent Kunjitha ...
Court : Chennai
Decided on : Jul-22-1988
Reported in : (1988)2MLJ167
wife of thambithurai and that the plaintiffs mother was not married by him d w 2 has not given the date death of anjammal they were the exclusive owners of the property and as the defendant is not acknowledging their title and the parties to the marriage who may at times by actuated by ulterior motives but if in addition thereto or independently the suit property in fact the suit is valued under section 25 a of the court fees act and court fees 1 a w r 91 1962 m l j cri 91 a i r 1962 a p 311 in support of
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBhainron Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.
Court : Rajasthan
Decided on : Dec-20-1988
Reported in : 1(1989)WLN(Rev)86
sambherlake under the aforesaid order dated 20 1 1987 the property of the petitioner which was mortgaged has only been attached merit dismissed summarily rajasthan agricultural credit operations r amp d act 1974 sections 12 amp 13 attachment of agricultural property made to attachment and sale by process of court and that section as appears was made because otherwise it would have been
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT