Marriage Laws Amendment Act 2001 Section 7 - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: marriage laws amendment act 2001 section 7 Year: 1978 Page 1 of about 427 results (1.855 seconds)J.P. Sharma Vs. Shasffi Bala
Court : Delhi
Decided on : Oct-16-1978
Reported in : ILR1979Delhi288
amended section 10 reads 10 1 either party to a marriage whether solemnized before or after the commencement of this act costs hindu marriage act 1955 section 13 as amended marriage laws amendment act 1976 section 39 divorce petition for cruelty unsoundness in any court at the commencement of the marriage laws amendment act 1976 shall be dealt with and decided by such section 13 1 iii of the act as amended by act no 68 of 1976 5 during the pendency of the in terms of clause ia of sub section 1 of section 13 of the amended act 17 it is contended by or not it requires or is susceptible to medical treatments 7 section 39 of the amending act made a special provision
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTUpendra Kumar Vs. Harpriya Kumar
Court : Delhi
Decided on : Jan-19-1978
Reported in : ILR1978Delhi97
been specially created in case of hindumarriages by the hindu marriage act special rights call for specialremedies the legislature has provided depending on the pecuniaryand territorial jurisdictions provided by the various laws in this behalf that in the present case the principal hindu marriage act 1955 has been amendedby the marriage laws amendment act 68 of 1976 and the sectionnow reads as under than one at the time of commencement of the suit actuallyand voluntarily resides or carries on business or personally works for all the courtseems to have missed the last line of section 3 b of the hindumarriage act while comparing it with by r v armitage 1872 l r 7 q b 773 in that case there was a statutory provision that justices
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCh. Krishnama Naidu Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh
Court : Andhra Pradesh
Decided on : Jul-17-1978
Reported in : AIR1979AP18
that marriage under this act and whether or not the marriage is held to be void otherwise than on a petition child born before or after the commencement of the marriage laws amendment act 1976 and whether or not a decree of of hindu marriage act section 16 1 of hindu marriage amendment act 1976 and section 11 of parent act plaintiff contended question is whether under section 4 a of the ceiling act the area of the parents has to be increased by section 16 1 of hindu marriage amendment act 1976 and section 11 of parent act plaintiff contended that there was no act which was introduced by the amended act 68 of 76 confers legitimacy on such children and the same reads follows
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRaj Bala Vs. Pramod Kumar
Court : Delhi
Decided on : Jul-24-1978
Reported in : 15(1979)DLT153
if it is a petition or proceeding under the hindu marriage act then so far as may be as if it while the petition was pending the parliament passed the marriage laws amendment act 1976 amendment act which came into force on the hindu marriage act of 1955 section 39 of the amendment act provides special provisions as to pending cases 1 all it had been originally instituted therein under the special marriage act as amended by this act 2 in every petition or 90 days of the decree as was the law under section 28 of the act 1955 prior to the amendment act invited me to follow those rulings and condone the delay 7 i regret my inability to agree with him under the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKantibai Vs. Kamal Singh Thakur
Court : Madhya Pradesh
Decided on : May-02-1978
Reported in : AIR1978MP245; 1978MPLJ633
strong and peremptory than section 28 4 of the hindu marriage act with which we are concerned the hindu marriage act 1955 as amended by the marriage laws amendment act 1976 act no 68 of 1976 will be section 28 of the hindu marriage act as introduced by amendment act no 68 of 1976 reads as under 28 appeal have been made by the marriage laws amendment act 1976 act no 68 of 1976 with that end in view that election petition under section 81 it should equally apply to sections 82 and 117 because under section 86 the high court the penalty of the petition being dismissed at p 493 7 the decision in hukumdev s case air 1974 sc 480
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGurcharan Singh Vs. Sukhdev Kaur
Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Oct-03-1978
Reported in : AIR1979P& H98
restitution of conjugal rights as between the parties to the marriage for a period of two years or upwards after the ground for divorce only in the amended act the marriage laws amendment act 1976 cruelty was not a ground for divorce for divorce only in the amended act the marriage laws amendment act 1976 cruelty was not a ground for divorce under added as a ground for divorce only in the amended act the marriage laws amendment act 1976 cruelty was not a it is well settled that the definition of judgment in section 2 9 of c p c is much wider and gone through the record of the case with hie help 7 the appellant as stated earner has reiterated the allegations made
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPrakash Wati Vs. P.C. Verma
Court : Delhi
Decided on : Apr-04-1978
Reported in : 14(1978)DLT163
on may 27 1976 the act was amended by the marriage laws amendment act in consequence the respondent moved on application august 1975 secondly reading section 39 2 of the marriage laws amendment act it is obvious that the application under section in the act by section 39 of the marriage laws amendment act which was enacted in 1976 obviously the application for of the act to one under section 13 of the act section 39 2 of the marriage laws amendment act postulates the act to one under section 13 of the act section 39 2 of the marriage laws amendment act postulates two the act filed on september 6 1976 would be premature 7 in my opinion there is no cognet evidersce on record
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSm. Bijoli Choudhury Vs. Sukomal Choudhury
Court : Kolkata
Decided on : Jul-10-1978
Reported in : AIR1979Cal87
learned author cruelty which is a ground for dissolution of marriage may be de fined as wilful and unjustifiable conduct of court alipore during the pendency of this appeal the marriage laws amendment act 1976 was enacted which inter alia made several amendment act 1976 was enacted which inter alia made several amendments in the hindu marriage act 1953 the respondent husband has which inter alia made several amendments in the hindu marriage act 1953 the respondent husband has filed an application in this the respondent husband in paragraph 6 of his petition under section 10 of the hindu marriage act had claimed that the for the respondent relied upon a passage occurring at page 77 of tolstoy s the law and practice of divorce and
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSmt. A.P. Marry Vs. K.G. Raghawan
Court : Madhya Pradesh
Decided on : Oct-13-1978
Reported in : AIR1979MP40; 1979MPLJ44
a is as under has after the solemnization of the marriage treated the petitioner with cruelty therefore the requirement of cruelty in hindu marriage act has been amended by the marriage laws amendment act 1976 and section 10 has been deleted and hindu marriage act has been amended by the marriage laws amendment act 1976 and section 10 has been deleted and new would be disinclined to dismiss lightly the so called isolated acts of violence and assault as not amounting to cruelty if has been deleted and new section introduced as per amended section 13 divorce can be obtained on the ground of cruelty she used to go out with him on 11 11 72 the respondent found the appellant with sashi together in model
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSuvarna Vs. G.M. Achary
Court : Andhra Pradesh
Decided on : Feb-22-1978
Reported in : AIR1979AP169
allowed family nullity of marriage section 12 1 of hindu marriage act 1955 and hindu marriage amendment act 1976 appeal filed it need not detain us for long there is an amendment effected to section 12 1 a by amending act 68 says this normally the hymen is ruptured by the first act of coitus though it may persist even after frequent acts detain us for long there is an amendment effected to section 12 1 a by amending act 68 of 76 by to section 12 1 a by amending act 68 of 76 by virtue of which cl a of s 12 1
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT