Marriage Laws Amendment Act 2001 Section 7 - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: marriage laws amendment act 2001 section 7 Page 1 of about 889 results (3.637 seconds)Bathula Iylaiah Vs. Bathula Devamma
Court : Andhra Pradesh
Reported in : AIR1981AP74
the age of 15 years and she has repudiated the marriage after attaining that age but before attaining the age of no marriage tie between them i a alter the marriage laws amendment act 1976 act 68 of 1976 came into force the hindu marriage act added by section 7 of the amendment act 1976 reads as under a wife may also present seek compensation is not restricted only to the workmens compensation act it has been enlarged to enable such person to seek filed by the insured and the insurer is not maintainable section 166 v gopala gowda jawad rahim jj claim for compensation judge dissolved the marriage and decreed the suit for divorce 7 the learned counsel for the appellant mainly contended that the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTValliammal Vs. Kamalambal and 8 ors.
Court : Chennai
Reported in : II(1990)DMC574
a specific class of illegitimate children born out of a marriage which will be null and void under section 11 and the hindu marriage act 1955 was amendment by the marriage laws of amendment act 1976 with effect from 27 5 1976 born out of such bigamous relationship by virtue of this amendment are entitled to be treated on a par with that nullity is granted in respect of that marriage under this act and whether or not the marriage is held to be or no share at all will depend upon applicability of section 16 of the hindu marriage act as amended for this and raju mudaliar was performed according to hindu rites on 7 5 1948 sic 1949 at tiruvanmiyur temple and that the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMargabandhu and anr. Vs. Kothandarama Mandhiri and 0rs.
Court : Chennai
Reported in : AIR1984Mad270; (1987)IIMLJ267
no costs 8 appeal dismissed 11 any child of such marriage who would have been legitimate if the marriage had been is born before or after the commencement of the marriage laws amendment act 1976 this amendment clearly gives right even to the commencement of the marriage laws amendment act 1976 this amendment clearly gives right even to illegitimate children even though the application whatsoever since this was rendered prior to the amendment act of 1976 another decision relied on by him is hanmanta but this contention overlooks the amendment act 68 of 1976 section 16 1 of the hindu marriage act 1955 as amended fours sons take equal shares by virtue of die amendment 7 the result is there is no reason for me to
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTP.V. Gopalkrishnan Vs. Kanaksha Gopalkrishnan (Mrs.)
Court : Mumbai
Reported in : 1982(1)BomCR454a
prolapsed of uterus to her knowledge since prior to her marriage 14 mr dalvi then attacks the evidence on the ground a child will not be impotency as contemplated by the laws governing divorce i would like to add to this definition the case of samar v snigdha air1977cal213 prior to the amendment of 1976 the ground for nullity under the hindu marriage medically a sexual defect then he says that for each act of intercourse in case of prolapsed of uterus the uterus would thus be seen that the word fraud used in section 12 1 c of the hindu marriage act does not court in raghunath gopal daftardar v vijaya raghunath gopal daftardar 73 bom l r 840 in that case the consent to
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTShri Shahaji Kisan Asme and ors. Vs. Shri Sitaram Kondi Asme and ors.
Court : Mumbai
Reported in : AIR2010Bom24
a decree of nullity is granted in respect of that marriage under this act and whether or not the marriage is is born before or after the commencement of the marriage laws amendment act 1976 68 of 1976 ad whether or not by making an amendment in section 16 by marriage laws amendment act 1976 the difference was tried to be done away underwent important changes by virtue of the marriage laws amendment act 1976 which came into force with effect from 27 5 intestate shall devolve according to the rules set out in section 16 a firstly upon the sons and daughters including the v smt dagubai tukaram patiland ors 1987 mah l r 777 the division bench of this court observed as follows 20
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSmt. Sarojamma and ors. Vs. Smt. Neelamma and ors.
Court : Karnataka
Reported in : II(2005)DMC567; ILR2005KAR3293; 2005(5)KarLJ66
..... being the legitimate child of his parents b hindu marriage act 1955 section 16 3 marriage laws amendment act 1976 act 68 of 1976 meaning of words property of any ..... iii g nirmalamma and ors v g seethapathi and ors air 2001 ap 1048 however sri h r prasad learned counsel appearing ..... wife of the said kuruvathi basavarajappa the defendants 2 to 7 were also the children of the 1st defendant and kuruvathi .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPinninti Venkataramana and anr. Vs. State
Court : Andhra Pradesh
Reported in : AIR1977AP43
deals with voidable marriages sub section 1 provides that any marriage whether solemnized before or after the commencement of the act section 2 of s 13 as inserted by the marriage laws amendment act 1976 are satisfied at the instance of the act were extensively amended in 1976 by the marriage laws amendment act 1976 act no 68 of 1976 the provisions of these terms any marriage solemnized after the commencement of this act shall be null and void and may on a petition the permission as required under clause vi of the said section is not obtained is not ipso jure void under the by us so far as criminal miscellaneous petition no 809 76 is concerned the only ground on which the order of
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTTejinder Kaur Vs. Gurmit Singh
Court : Supreme Court of India
Reported in : AIR1988SC839; JT1988(1)SC39; (1988)93PLR629; 1988(1)SCALE398; (1988)2SCC90; [1988]2SCR1098; 1988(1)LC491(SC)
nullity the reason for this was an incapacity for second marriage for a certain period does not have the effect of 1963 section 15 of hindu marriage act 1955 and marriage laws amendment act 1976 issue regarding solemnization of second marriage by court of the first instance emphasis supplied4 prior to the amendment act of 1976 the proviso to section 15 laid down of cruelty under section 13 ia of the hindu marriage act 1955 against which the petitioner wife had preferred an appeal prior to the amendment act of 1976 the proviso to section 15 laid down a period of waiting of one year to the supreme court under article 136 of the constitution 7 in chandra mohini v avinash prasad 1967 1scr864 on somewhatsimilar
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTJ.P. Sharma Vs. Shasffi Bala
Court : Delhi
Reported in : ILR1979Delhi288
arc pending in any court at the commencement of the marriage laws amendment act 1976 shall be dealt with and decided the hindu marriage act 1955 was amended by the marriage laws amendment act 1976 68 of 1976 vital changes were made parties to amend the pleadings in so far as such amendment is necessary to give effect to the provisions of sub and seek divorce under section 13 1 iii of the act as amended by act no 68 of 1976 5 during in terms of clause ia of sub section 1 of section 13 of the amended act 17 it is contended by took place on that day the first incident was at 7 a m and the second incident was at 11 a
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSmt. Kusum, Wife of Shri R.K. Saxena, Daughter of Shri Daya Shankar Ma ...
Court : Delhi
Reported in : 110(2004)DLT721; I(2004)DMC654; 2004(74)DRJ24
..... marriage act were amended by the hindu marriage laws amendment act 1976 prior to the amendment cruelty was one of the grounds for judicial separation under section 10 of the act under that section ..... in may 2002 pertains to his salary for august 2001 this statement shows that his salary is about rs ..... preceding the filing of the petition 3 relief 7 by the impugned judgment and decree the learned trial .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT