Marriage Laws Amendment Act 2001 Section 7 - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: marriage laws amendment act 2001 section 7 Sorted by: old Year: 1992 Page 1 of about 472 results (1.532 seconds)J.B. Boda and Co. (P.) Ltd. Vs. Income-tax Officer
Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai
Decided on : Jan-01-1992
Reported in : (1992)41ITD36(Mum.)
total income computed in accordance with the provisions of this act before making any deduction under this chapter or under section of dividends computed in accordance with the provisions of the act it is difficult to appreciate how when we are interpreting this argument it is necessary firstly to reproduce the relevant sections section 35 1 t amp ii as it stood at on sale of shares rs 8 60 375 50 98 733 1 19 48 010 x 1 02 24 484 57
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGorawara Electronics Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax and anr.
Court : Allahabad
Decided on : Jan-02-1992
Reported in : [1992]196ITR608(All)
to the assessing authority under section 220 6 of the act to the effect that the petitioner may not be treated to the assessing authority under section 220 6 of the act to the effect that the petitioner may not be treated passed and instead the assessing authority has taken recourse to section 226 3 for realisation of the disputed amount as against
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRaj Laminates (P) Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise
Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on : Jan-02-1992
Reported in : (1992)(61)ELT132TriDel
1988 under rule 11b of the central excises and salt act 1944 and the claims for the periods prior to 16 was involved in that case was as to whether the amendment for larger amount after the expiry period of limitation prescribed 1988 under rule 11b of the central excises and salt act 1944 and the claims for the periods prior to 16 agarwal member judicial in terms of sub section 1 of section 35d of the central excises and salt act 1944 read 90 the revised classification list was returned to them on 7 10 1988 stating that their earlier classification lists approved under
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTElgi Tyre and Tread Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise
Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on : Jan-02-1992
Reported in : (1992)(61)ELT107TriDel
of the first schedule to the central excises amp salt act 1944 1 of 1944 from the whole of the duty no 47 76 c e dated 9 3 1976 as amended by notification no 193 80 c e dt 8 12 other rubber tyres there would be variation in sizes the actual measurements for which will be intimated as and when production for complex shapes also the extrudate with a complex cross section 11 the ld counsel thereafter explained with reference to the laboratory and the report of the chemical examiner dated 5 7 1984 which is relevant for determining the question of classification
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTJ.K. Batteries Vs. Collector of Customs
Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on : Jan-02-1992
Reported in : (1993)(65)ELT419TriDel
person aggrieved by any decision or order passed under this act by an officer of customs lower in rank than a person aggrieved by any decision or order passed under this act by an officer of customs lower in rank than a regarding the classification was challengeable in appeal in view of section 128 cited above in view of the above position we as expressed by the learned collector appeals in his observations 7 we find that the learned counsel s contentions have a
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAgra Metallurgical Engineers (P) Vs. Collector of C. Ex.
Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on : Jan-02-1992
Reported in : (1992)(60)ELT160TriDel
from the market in these circumstances provisions contained in para 7 of notification no 175 86 will not be attracted in
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTincome-tax Officer Vs. Hansalaya Properties
Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi
Decided on : Jan-02-1992
Reported in : (1992)41ITD290(Delhi)
the transaction is that an erstwhile member of a joint hindu family who has only an interest in the entire joint of rs 34 lakhs was to be taken as the actual cost of this property to govindram and the hon ble the cit appeals erred in holding that the provisions of section 49 1 iii b of the income tax act are that the transaction had resulted in a gain of rs 75 000 to the assessee which was taxable and this was
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Income-tax Vs. Thomas Kurien
Court : Kerala
Decided on : Jan-03-1992
Reported in : (1992)103CTR(Ker)300; [1992]195ITR531(Ker)
the revenue under section 256 1 of the income tax act was also dismissed it is thereafter in proceedings under section assessment for compliance with section 144b of the income tax act and directed that a fresh assessment after following the procedure act was also dismissed it is thereafter in proceedings under section 256 2 of the act that this court directed the operative housing society for a consideration of rs 1 91 760 the income tax officer held that capital gains accrued as
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPragati Press Vs. Collector of Customs
Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on : Jan-03-1992
Reported in : (1994)(72)ELT620TriDel
liable to confiscation under section 111 d of the customs act 1962 for the alleged breach of the provisions of para this case there is no reason as to why the actual freight and insurance charges incurred by the appellants from u hearing the adjudicating authority has confiscated both the machines under section 111 m of the customs act and the offset printing of the two machines a show cause notice dated 3 7 1990 was issued by the assistant collector of customs sib
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSyndicate Bank Vs. Vittal Bhat
Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Jan-03-1992
Reported in : ILR1992KAR991
granted decree for eviction arising under the karnataka rent control act and during the pendency of the execution proceedings the karnataka petition fails and is dismissed no costs karnataka civil courts laws amendment act 1989 karnataka act no 13 of 1989 section easy disposal of cases with that end in view the amendment has been brought in it is not in dispute that 1975 is hereby repealed provided that anything done or any action taken under the principal act as amended by the said judge to the court of the munsiff was presented under section 39 c p c indeed the provisions of section 4 not see any force in the submissions of sri aswatharam 7 firstly in a case of this nature the invoking of
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT