Marriage Laws Amendment Act 2001 Section 7 - Judgment Search Results

Seema Pathak Vs. Chotelal Pandey

Court : Jharkhand

after making such inquiry as it thinks fit that a marriage has been solemnised and that the averments in the 4 was solemnised before or after the commencement of the marriage laws amendment act 1976 68 of 1976 on the ground that by the parties on 10 11 2006 there was some amendment in the date of marriage and the suit was admitted allowing the petition filed under section 13 b of the act 6 learned counsel further submitted that in a suit for be dissolved with effect from the date of decree 12 section 23 1 bb of the hindu marriage act reads as the petition filed under section 13 b of the act 7 learned counsel has placed reliance upon a decision of the

Smt. Hina Singh Vs. Satya Kumar Singh

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : AIR2007Jhar34; [2007(1)JCR570(Jhr)]

..... parties to a marriage together whether such marriage was solemnized before or after the commencement of the marriage laws amendment act 1976 on ..... 2001 in accordance with the hindu rites and customs in 2003 the respondent husband filed an application under section 9 of the hindu marriage act ..... of divorce declaring the marriage to be dissolved with effect from the date of the decree 7 from bare perusal .....

Smt. Deepa Devi Vs. Dhiraj Kumar Singh

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : AIR2006Jhar29; I(2006)DMC55; [2005(4)JCR191(Jhr)]

..... parties to a marriage together whether such marriage was solemnized before or after the commencement of the marriage laws amendment act 1976 68 of ..... 2001 2 the opposite party who is husband of the petitioner filed an application under section 13 b of the hindu marriage act for dissolution of the marriage ..... petitioners nor there is any chance for the same 7 that there is no chance of compromise between .....

Dipak Kumar Yadav Vs. Personnel and Adminis Reform

Court : Jharkhand

scc76 has held that children born out of the void marriage may not be excluded from succession and they are entitled is born before or after the commencement of the marriage laws amendment act 1976 and whether or not a decree of born before or after the commencement of the marriage laws amendment act 1976 and whether or not a decree of nullity which may be void in terms of the hindu marriage act section 16 1 of the hindu marriage act provides that may be void in terms of the hindu marriage act section 16 1 of the hindu marriage act provides that notwithstanding

Union of India Thr Gm Ec Railway Hajipur Vs. Suraj Kumar Prasad andor ...

Court : Jharkhand

of the hindu marriage act provides that notwithstanding that the marriage is null and void under section 11 any child of child is born before or after the commencement of marriage laws amendment act 1976 and whether or not a decree of is born before or after the commencement of marriage laws amendment act 1976 and whether or not a decree of nullity born before or after the commencement of marriage laws amendment act 1976 and whether or not a decree of nullity is among the widow and son they all get shares see sections 8 10 and the schedule to the hindu succession act married during the lifetime of first wife for compassionate appointment 7 the central administrative tribunal while dealing o a no 212

M v v Prakash Vs. Union of India Represented Through the General Manag ...

Court : Jharkhand

cannot be described as a widow of narain lal her marriage with narain lal being void the sons of the marriage child is born before or after the commencement of marriage laws amendment act 1976 and whether or not a decree of is born before or after the commencement of marriage laws amendment act 1976 and whether or not a decree of nullity 2 of 2015 solemnized after the commencement of hindu marriage act 1955 in violation of clause 1 of section 5 shall null and void but even when such marriage is void section 16 of the hindu marriage act provides that notwithstanding that of cat calcutta bench in oa no 1117 of 2008 7 in the instant case however the second marriage was not

Razi Ahmed Alias Ravi Vs. The State of Jharkhand

Court : Jharkhand

her it is alleged that earlier also on pretext of marriage there was physical relation between the parties learned a p husband of the deceased it is alleged that the in laws have committed murder of the deceased it is alleged that indian penal code and section 17 of the criminal law amendment act the allegation against the accused persons and others is the indian penal code and section 27 of the arms act and 17 of the c l a act in connection parties the petitioner is an accused for the offence under sections 147 148 149 364 302 120 b of the indian case no 168 of 2016 corresponding to g r no 782 of 2016 ananda sen j amar in the high court

Ms Maharshi Nikhilesh Sewa Sansthan Through Its President Sri Jyoti Sw ...

Court : Jharkhand

registration of the society shall be cancelled or not the act does not provide a power in i g registration to or he may refuse to approve amendment in the by laws or the constitution of the society the contention of the g registration vide order dated 17 07 2012 cancelled the amendment registered on 12 03 2010 aggrieved the respondent no 4 maharshi nikhilesh sewa sansthan is registered under the societies registration act 1860 it is stated that the respondent no 4 and government to make rules and in exercise of power under section 24 the bihar societies registration rules 1965 has been framed inspector general registration on a complaint received or suo motu 7 the case pleaded by the petitioner is that ranbir singh

Jay Shankar Pathak and Another Vs. Election Commission of India and Ot ...

Court : Jharkhand

p act 1951 through the representation of the people amendment act 2003 act 40 of 2003 after holding that these two the commission in present situation acted in conformity with such laws and not in violation of such provisions b whether the 8217 ble supreme court in para 459 clearly observed that amendment has been brought in on the basis of the need that how any person can say that why the strong action for play of money power and horse trading is taken 3 of section 8 are disqualified to contest the election section 8a and 9 prescribed the disqualification on the ground of out of 81 members of the jharkhand state legislative assembly 79 members had cast their votes but they were not counted

Manoj Kumar Gupta Vs. Human Resources Department

Court : Jharkhand

our attention towards section 57 of the jharkhand state universities act 2000 which reads as follows 5 7 appointment of teachers after the entire process is completed will certainly amount to amendment of the terms and conditions of the eligibility criteria as information supplied to the petitioner under the right to information act it is pointed out from the said annexure that the in this connection learned counsel has drawn our attention towards section 57 of the jharkhand state universities act 2000 which reads paper i and paper ii the petitioner had bagged 60 72 marks respectively out of 100 marks in each paper and