Court : Supreme Court of India
Reported in : AIR2010SC383; 2010(1)AWC862(SC); 2009(14)SCALE399; (2010)1SCC549; 2010(1)LC42(SC):2009AIRSCW7629
..... by the government with respect to any moneys or balances which may be lying with the government owing to any dispute, difference; or misunderstanding between the engineer-in-charge in marking periodical or final payments or in any other respect whatsoever.47. considering the said clause, the court held that the prohibition in the said clause does not prevent the contractor .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Reported in : 1996IIIAD(Delhi)333; 3(1996)CLT337; 1996(38)DRJ203; ILR1996Delhi754
Anil Dev Singh, J. (1) This is a writ petition whereby the petitioner, a window of a riot victim, seeks enhancement of the amount of compensation of Rs.20,000.00 awarded to her on account of the death of her husband. (2) Shri Narain Singh, petitioner's husband, lost his life on November 1, 1984, in the riots which took place after the assassination of Smt. Indira Gandhi. On the fateful day he was traveling by Bombay Ferozepur Janta Express Train. According to the Fir No. 355 dated November 1, 1984, lodged at the Police Station New Delhi Railway Station around 12.30 Noon, the train slopped at Tughlakabad Railway Station where 300-350 villagers surrounded it. They pulled out 25/26 Sikh passengers from the train and killed them. The persons killed included Narain Singh son of Jawahar Singh, resident of Village Bhalajala, Tehsil Taran Taran, District Amritsar, Punjab (for particulars see death certificate at page 6 of the writ record). (3) On October 20, 1986, after about two years of the ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Reported in : 120(2005)DLT156; 2005(82)DRJ459
..... a victim.21. it is noteworthy that it would be impossible to recover from the terror which was generated against the community to which the petitioner belonged in 1984. the mark left by such riots and the insecurity generated as a result in the minds of those who suffered at the hands of the marauding mobs may perhaps never get obliterated .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Reported in : 139(2007)DLT7; 2007(94)DRJ573
..... any law made by the state legislatures:provided further that the retail dealer or other person shall not charge such revised prices in relation to any packages except those packages which bear marking indicating that they were pre-packed in the month in which such tax has been revised or fresh tax has been imposed or in the month ..... immediately following he month aforesaid:provided also that where the revised prices are lower than the price marked on the package the retail dealer or other person shall not charge any price in excess of the revised price, irrespective of the month in which the commodity was pre- ..... and to the director in the central government and controllers of legal metrology in the states and union territories, the revised prices of such packages but the difference between the price marked on the package and the revised price shall not, in any case, be higher than the extent of increase in the tax or in the case of .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai
Reported in : AIR1983Mad309; (1983)1MLJ399
..... side-wind what he had lost in the proceedings under the agriculturists relief act. the law as laid down by this court over the years with sathiadev, j.'s judgment marking the summation of the case law does put us on an enquiry about the relationship between the usufructuary mortgagor and mortgagee who also bear the relationship of lessee and landlord .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai
Reported in : (1997)2MLJ537
..... otherwise, they are eventually of no decisive assistance. in none of these has any effort been taken to locate the suit property in lekkom 28 with reference to settled land marks in boundaries of not only that lekkum but also the portion conveyed out of which the plaintiffs' predecessors had purchased a part, and with reference to the terms of the ..... . costs will abide by the result of the suit.18. after impleading the state as 13th defendant, p w2 was further cross-examined and thereafter exhibits a22 and a23 were marked. the only other evidence that was let in on the side of the plaintiff was c8 and c9. no other evidence was let in, even though opportunity was given to ..... located as directed by the order of remand in a.s. no. 192 of 1975. it further came to the conclusion that the sale deed in favour of the plaintiff, marked as exhibit a.1, was also executed by simpson under suspicious circumstances. the alleged oral agreement for sale referred to in exhibit a-1 was also found to be not .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai
Reported in : (1998)1MLJ553
..... of anything previously done under that rule.21. to be precise initially, the government of india took a decision to exempt agarbathi packages from the obligation of packaging in standard quantities (rule 5) and that of date marking (rule 6-d) and manufacturers/packers of agarbathi may use their existing stocks of their ..... packaging materials upto 30th of june, 1978. it was also clarified that the packages of agarbathi would have to bear thereon the other mandatory declarations namely, (1) the name of the commodity ..... .22. subsequently in exercise of powers conferred by section 83 of central act 60 of 1976, the central government introduced amendment to the standards of weights and measures (packaged commodities) rules, 1977. in terms of this amendment clause (c) was introduced in rule 34, the amendment being' (c) if contains biddies or incense sticks. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai
Reported in : 2003(4)CTC641
..... the order of the first respondent impugned in the writ petition is analysed, i find that while in paragraph 7 of the order, the first respondent has recorded the documents marked on either side and the witnesses. its conclusion has been set out by the first respondent only in paragraphs 14 to 24. in paragraph 14 to 19, the first respondent ..... of the lorry receipts, which were purchased by the second respondent were later found to be bogus receipts which were produced by rkmk and thereby the bank was put to heavy monetary loss. in the charge sheet, it is stated that the chairman called for a meeting on 24.3.1994, in which admittedly the second respondent was also present when ..... on 24.3.1994 were placed before the first respondent and the concerned officers were also examined on the petitioners side by way of rw- 1 to 10 apart from marking exs.r 1 to 28. however, the perusal of the findings recorded by the first respondent in paragraph 14 and 15 discloses that he has not referred to any of .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... with the search operations. they had search warrants under section 58(2) of the gca. gold coins, sovereigns, gold bars/mohars, studded and unstudded gold ornaments, gold biscuits with foreign markings, primary gold, two broken pieces of articles of gold and gold coins/mohars/sovereign issued by different rules of erstwhile indian states were also seized from the ground pit and .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kolkata
Reported in : 1950CriLJ136
..... it was really necesaary to place these depositions on the record under h. 288 of the code. he has allowed the whole of the depositions to be put in without marking the particular passages upon which the prosecution rely. thin procedure has resulted in the time of this court being wasted in attempting to discover what these passages were, with regard .....
Tag this Judgment!