Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: marking of heavy packages act 1951 section 1 short title extent and commencement Page 1 of about 319 results (0.209 seconds)

Mar 03 1969 (FN)

United States Vs. Louisiana

Court : US Supreme Court

..... rather result from the interpretation this court has given the act, chiefly by saying that congress intended to give the page 394 u. s. 10 task of marking submerged land to judges, rather than to surveyors, and by holding further that the task should be handled by reference to international treaties. the uncertainty and confusion ..... obviously, the best way to settle a boundary dispute, whether water or land, is to designate a governmental agency that can undertake the complex problem of determining and marking where the inland and territorial waters meet. as i have pointed out in my dissent in the louisiana boundary page 394 u. s. 9 case, decided today ..... water on the california coast were "inland waters" within the meaning of 2(c), which provides that "[t]he term coast line' means the line . . . marking the seaward limit of inland waters." we held that the legislative history showed that congress intended that the courts should define the term "inland waters." in discharging that assignment, .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 18 2013 (HC)

High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Vs. M/S. Atma Tube Products Ltd. a ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... banking regulatio act 19. representation of the people act 20. telegraph wires (unlawful possession) act 21. industries (development and regulation) act 22. the marking of heavy packages act 23. the state financial corporations act 24. employees provident funds and miscellaneous provisions act 25. notaries act 26. delivery of books and newspapers ( ..... 84. teleco.regulatory authority of india act 85. electricity regulatory commissions act 86. geographical indications of goods (registration and protection) act 87. trade marks act 88. information technology act 89. the semiconductor integrated circuits layout-design act 90. electricity act 91. coastal aquaculture authority act 92. credit information ..... . indian medical degrees act 4. official secrets act 5. reserve bank of india act 6. payment of wages act 7. agricultural produce (grading and marking) act 8. insurance act 9. coffee act 10. industrial disputes act 11. damodar valley corporation act 12. dentists act 13. dock workers (regulation of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 07 2005 (TRI)

Monsanto Manufacturers Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commr. of C. Ex.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in : (2006)(193)ELT495TriDel

..... impugned order that the consignments in question should be valued under section 4a of the act because ice cream remains a specified item, is not correct. the marking on the packages in question leaves no doubt that the consignments are not intended for retail sale. the revenue also has no case that the clearances in question were in violation ..... 4 of the central excise act. in the present case, it has been emphasized that there could be no dispute about the channel of disposal. the prominent marking on the packages made it clear that they were not for retail sale; but were intended for catering industry or institutional sale.5. the learned counsel has also pointed out that ..... the standards of weights and measures act, 1976, or the rules made thereunder or under any other law for the time being in force, to declare on the package thereof the retail sale price of such goods." in other words, if there is no statutory requirement under the provisions of weights and measures act to declare the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 11 2002 (TRI)

Commissioner of Customs, Kolkata Vs. Ashoke Kr. Agarwal

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Calcutta

Reported in : (2002)(81)ECC530

..... revenue against the order-in-appeal passed by commissioner of customs (appeals) vide which he has set aside the order of the lower authorities confiscating five numbers of foreign markings gold biscuits and imposing personal penalty of rs. 50,000/- (rupees fifty thousand) on the first respondent shri ashoke kr. agarwal and rs. 5,000/- (rupees five ..... by the appellant did not cover the seized gold biscuits in question. however, by extending the benefit in respect of the three gold biscuits, which had the same markings of 'credit swisse', as were appearing in the gold biscuits imported by m/s. mmtc, he released the said three biscuits.7. on an appeal against the ..... said to have been discharged. it is seen that the respondents have already been given the benefit by original adjudicating authority in respect of three gold biscuits bearing the markings 'credit swisse' by observing that the same may be out of the lot of gold biscuits imported by m/s.mmtc.11. commissioner (appeals) has also .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 10 2002 (TRI)

Jayanti Food Processing Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex., Jaipur

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in : (2002)(80)ECC219

..... its case will not come within clause (iii) of the proviso. clause (a) of rule 34 exempts certain packages from the provisions of pc rules. they are packages containing a commodity with a marking on the package unambiguously indicating that it has been specially packed for the exclusive use of any industry as a raw material or ..... pc rules. relevant portion of rule 34 is reproduced below : "34. exemption in respect of certain packages. - nothing contained in these rules shall apply to any package containing a commodity if, - (a) the marking oh the package unambiguously indicates that it has been specially packed for the exclusive use of any industry as a raw material ..... the pack "especially packed for catering industry -not for retail sale". he submits that the above marking would take the package out of the provisions of pc rules.chapter ii of die above rule contains provisions applicable to packages intended for retail sale. rule 3 provides that the provisions of this chapter shall apply to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 10 1989 (TRI)

Sukumar Mondal Vs. Collector of Customs (Prev.)

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Calcutta

Reported in : (1990)(48)ELT56Tri(Kol.)kata

..... informed by the department that, on a reference to superintendent, customs, dinhata, it had been ascertained that some of the pieces of readymade garments under seizure bear marks of foreign origin viz. japan, taiwan, korea.that this established the fact that such goods of third country origin were illicitly brought into india through unauthorised route ..... that the goods seized had been procured from the local people on valuable consideration. the accumulation of stocks has been explained by the appellants as caused by heavy rainfall in dinhata town in the monsoon season as a result of which the goods could not be despatched to the different hats. there is no finding ..... by cash or in exchange of different household materials. there was accumulation of stocks in the godown as they could not be despatched for sale due to heavy rainfall in dinhata town. the allegation in the show cause notice that the seized goods had been imported from bangladesh without any valid permit was misconceived and .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 31 1991 (TRI)

Air India Vs. Addl. Collector of Customs (P)

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Reported in : (1993)(67)ELT400Tri(Mum.)bai

..... be handicrafts of soap stone. the consignor's name would be shown as geeta marble co., 7580 pearey lal bhavan, new delhi. it is evident from the markings on 5 packages as recorded in the panchanama that they are clearly relatable to the consignment covered by the shipping bill and also the relevant airway bill of bombay. hence, ..... and taken the cargo. that part of the theory has however to be rejected, in view of the evidence in the form of markings available that the consignment was booked at bombay and packages were brought to the air port cargo complex at bombay. some other incidents and events co-relatable to the main incident also exist, ..... per the shipping bill filed at bombay. in the circumstances, it cannot be accepted that someone has loaded the packages either at dubai or at london and put these markings on the consignment and sent to new york. these packages have actually been shipped only at bombay unauthorisedly. she also pointed out that the customs officers were acting on .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 30 1987 (TRI)

Systems Aids Vs. Collector of Customs

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Reported in : (1987)(14)ECC393

..... the appellant claims to know that the goods were missent even as early as in may 1986. the learned d.r. also drew our attention to the marking in the packages which clearly show that the goods were despatched to the appellant.5. we have carefully considered the submissions made before us. the short question that arises for ..... them.as rightly pointed out by the learned d.r. the records clearly establish that the goods in question in the container were found packed in cartons with the marking of the appellant's name namely, "system aids - bangalore". the plea of the learned counsel that the impugned order is on the basis of surmises and conjectures ..... things :5.sinclair* power supply unit - 283 nos.6 12" conic monochrome monitors - 4 nos.the aforesaid goods found in the container were packed in cartons with the marking "systems aids - bangalore", which would refer to the appellant. again on 5-8-1986 a notice was issued by the asstt.collector of customs, inland container depot to the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 31 1914 (PC)

Amatoo and Vs. Sheik Muksud Ali and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : 28Ind.Cas.314

1. The plaintiff No. 1 is the auction-purchaser at a rent sale in respect of a patni taluq of 8-annas 1-ganda share in Taluqa Jibba Kata Gheringaon. The plaintiff No. 2 was said to be the real purchaser, plaintiff No. 1 being his servant and benamidar. It was owing to an objection made by the defendants that they became joint plaintiffs. It has been held that the benami has not been proyed: this finding has been very strongly impeached before us, but the finding' is one of fact, however unsatisfactorily it may have been arrived at.2. The defendants first party are the cultivating raiyats and defendants second party, holders of an intermediate tenure said to have been annulled by the plaintiff No. 1 under Section 167 of the Bengal Tenancy Act.3. The plea of the defendants first party was, amongst other things, that they had paid the rent to their landlords, the defendants second party, and the relation of landlord and tenant did not exist as between themselves and the plaintiffs.4. The ...

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 07 2018 (HC)

M/S Ram Abhoshan vs.m/s Pec Limited

Court : Delhi

$-17 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:7. h August, 2018 + O.M.P. 444/2015 M/S RAM ABHOSHAN ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.J.M.Sharma, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Neil Hildreth, Mr.Rahul Jain, Mr.Ajit Sharma, Advs. versus M/S PEC LIMITED ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Rajesh Kumar, Mr.G.K.Singh, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA NAVIN CHAWLA, J.(Oral) 1. This petition has been filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenging the Arbitral Award dated 28th April, 2015 passed by the majority of the members of the Arbitral Tribunal dismissing the claim of the petitioner.2. The disputes between the parties have arisen out of the Tender No.PEC/Gold Del/20:80/2014-15/Lot-8 dated 12th May, 2014 floated by the respondent with respect to Net Trading Margin on Sale of Gold by PEC to be imported in 8th Lot of 337 kg. under 20:80 scheme of RBI".3. The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) vide its Circular dated 14th August, 2013 had clarified its inst...

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //