Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: marking of heavy packages act 1951 section 1 short title extent and commencement Court: mumbai nagpur Page 1 of about 1 results (0.110 seconds)

Dec 09 2011 (HC)

M/S. Spacewood Furnishers Pvt. Ltd. and ors. Vs. the Director General ...

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

..... , pune. the last page i.e. after page 2 which contains a sentence already noted above, again bears signature of the director of income tax, nagpur and then it is marked to the director general of income tax (investigation), pune. thus, in the absence of this last page also, note of director of income tax (investigation), nagpur, appears to be a .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 12 2015 (HC)

The State of Maharashtra and Another Vs. Shatrughna Baban Meshram and ...

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

..... out of place to state that in the case of rajendra pralhadrao wasnik .v. state of maharashtra (cited supra), the victim was subjected to sexual violence and there were bite marks on chest left side around nipple elliptical with diameters 1 ? x ? x muscledeep. the apex court in the said case observed thus 37. when the court draws a ..... which the prosecution relies are the interested witnesses being the father and the grandfather of the victim. in support of his submission, the learned counsel for the appellant/accused places heavy reliance on the judgments of the apex court in the cases of rameshbhai chandubhai rathod .v. state of gujarat (reported in air 2011 sc, 903) and neel kumar ..... such heinous act of the accused has shocked the conscious of the society and for the said act, the only punishment is the death punishment. the learned pp places heavy reliance on the judgments of the apex court as well as this court in the cases of bachan singh .v. state of punjab (reported in air 1980 sc, .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 08 2014 (HC)

The State of Maharashtra and Another Vs. Ramesh Jibeba Lahane and Anot ...

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

..... shankar lahane, gulabrao bakal and one mahadeo khandare identified the said body. on examination, he found that the dead body was well nourished and cold rigor mortis were well marked. he also noticed sign of decomposition. greenish discolouration over abdomen was present. he noticed postmortem peeling off skin over back buttock and both the upper and lower limbs. he ..... . pw 1-shankar is the son of deceased-vishwanath. pw 6gulabrao bakal is co-brother of the deceased. in view of their relations with deceased, remembering the peculiar marks in the nature of corns and the short toes on the foot, there is no room to raise a suspicion in respect of their identification. we cannot forget that ..... said person was murdered. in the cross-examination sagar has admitted that around 8.00 to 8.30 p.m. the person who was taken by pankaj was under heavy drunken state. he states that he has seen pankaj while taking away that person towards the house of ramesh. however he did not see him entering into the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 18 2016 (HC)

Ramdas and Others Vs. The State of Maharashtra, through the Secretary, ...

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

..... to kelibag up to c. p. and berar college 15.00 mt. wide. the width of kelibag road in sanctioned development plan was shown to be 24.00 mt. but marking of widening of 24.00 mt. has been cancelled by blue colour under section 29 and the demarcation of road is shown by blue colour less than the width shown ..... to kelibag up to c. p. and berar college 15.00 mt.wide. the width of kelibag road in sanctioned development plan was shown to be 24.00 mt. but marking of widening of 24.00 mt.has been cancelled by blue colour under section 29 and the demarcation of road is shown by blue colour less than the width shown .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 02 2012 (HC)

Rajesh Bhaurao Sadanshiv Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV J. 1. The appellant herein stands convicted for offence punishable under Section 302 of Indian Penal Code and is sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for life and fine of Rs.500/- in default further rigorous imprisonment for 3 months by the 2nd Ad-hoc Additional Sessions Judge, Akola in Sessions Trial No. 153 of 2005 by a judgment and order dated 1.11.2006. Being aggrieved by the said judgment, the appellant herein has preferred the present criminal appeal. 2. The case of the prosecution in nutshell is that:- On 29.8.2005 Mahadeo Suryabhan Dhokne lodged a report at Old City Police Station, Akola alleging therein that on 29.8.2005 at about 1.30 p.m. one Balu Sapkal resident of the same village, informed him that his nephew namely Siddharth was lying dead under the banyan tree in front of the house of Shivlal Dhokare. MahadeoDhokne, therefore, rushed to the spot and noticed that his nephew Siddharth was lying in a pool of blood. He had inquired about the incid...

Tag this Judgment!

May 06 2016 (HC)

Rahul and Others Vs. State of Maharashtra, through its Secretary, Urba ...

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

1. By this petition, the petitioners have challenged the legality and correctness of the order dated 20.2.2016 passed by the respondent no. 2, the Hon'ble Minister, thereby disqualifying the petitioners under the provisions of Sections 55B and 42 of the Maharashtra Municipal Councils, Nagar Panchayats and Industrial Townships Act, 1965 (hereinafter referred to as the Act, 1965). 2. The petitioners, when the impugned order was passed, were or had been the part of the Municipal Council, Katol, in such capacities as petitioner no. 1 being the President; petitioner no. 2 being the Ex-President and the Councillor and petitioner nos. 3 to 10 being the councillors and petitioner no. 10 being a co-opted councillor. They were disqualified by respondent no.2 for the reason that they were found to have indulged in misconduct and disgraceful conduct. The alleged controversial conduct of the petitioners related to the allotment of some minor works to one contractor, Shri Bambal. 3. Some councillors...

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 22 2015 (HC)

Vijay and Others Vs. The State of Maharashtra, through Police Station ...

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

..... them in the court. the witness identified her signature at page nos. 4 and 13 of t.i. parade panchanama dated 21.08.2002. the said signatures are now marked at exhs. 508 and 509. she stated, she saw the incident from a distance of about 10 to 15 feet. she is b.a. in english literature and was ..... the assailants on the scene like a tidal wave moving towards the deceased pintu in tandem with deadly weapons showing 'common object' namely to kill him. thus, there is a marked distinction between 'conspiracy' and 'common object.' we, therefore, hold that the finding holding the accused persons guilty of offence punishable under section 120- b, indian penal code, is ..... in abdul karim mohammed shaban vs. state of maharashtra and another (2006 cri.l.j. 3658) to the effect that there is no necessity of eye witnesses to mark presence of other witnesses. 45. in reply to the arguments advanced by learned counsel shri jaltare for accused no.10 kamlesh that memorandum panchanama is of no consequence since .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 01 2016 (HC)

Jayashri Vs. Umesh

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

Indira Jain, J. 1. Admit. 2. Heard finally with the consent of the learned Counsel for the parties as record and proceedings are received. 3. By this appeal appellant/wife challenges the judgment of the Family Court, Akola dated 18-05-2015 allowing the petition filed by respondent/husband for dissolution of marriage on the ground of cruelty under Section 13(1)(ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. 4. Facts giving rise to the appeal may be stated in brief as under: Appellant and respondent (hereinafter appellant shall be referred as wife and respondent shall be referred as husband ) were married on 08-05-2011 at Amravati as per customary rites. After marriage wife went to Akola to cohabit with the husband in a joint family. At the time of marriage husband was serving in Axis Bank Branch at Pimpalgaon Baswant in District Nasik. 5. It is the case of husband that since beginning behaviour of wife was not proper. She was insisting to reside separately from joint family consisting of husband ...

Tag this Judgment!

May 06 2011 (HC)

R.B. Shreeram Religious and Charitable Trust and ors. Vs. the Nagpur I ...

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

..... n.i.t. and the common man. thus, the present scenario in the state of maharashtra does not permit handing over the suit property to other institution. the said undertaking marked x is accepted with a hope and trust that n.i.t. itself would run the dharmashala. 37. i, thus, find that none of the ingredients for granting temporary injunction .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //