Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: marking of heavy packages act 1951 section 1 short title extent and commencement Page 15 of about 319 results (0.131 seconds)

Nov 27 1979 (FN)

P. C. Pfeiffer Co., Inc. Vs. Ford

Court : US Supreme Court

..... , congress anticipated that some persons who work only on land would receive benefits under the 1972 act. an obvious example of such a worker is blundo. he was checking and marking cargo from a container that had been removed from a ship and moved overland to another pier before it was opened. without any indication that he ever would be required ..... unloading tasks traditionally conducted aboard ship to be performed on the land. such tasks are "longshoring operations." id. at 432 u. s. 270 -271. blundo's job of checking and marking goods as they page 444 u. s. 75 were removed from a container was an integral part of the unloading process even though the container had been removed from a .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 17 2005 (SC)

Commissioner of Central Excise, Allahabad Vs. Ginni Filaments Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : 2005(2)CTC61; 2005(98)ECC825; 2005(181)ELT145(SC); JT2005(2)SC322; (2005)3SCC378

..... before such removal is expected to take place.(c) marking of the packages.--packages to be marked and address to be noted in the application:the factory of removal (consignors) must--(i) ensure that packages bear proper marking and number;(ii) ensure that all copies of annexure 'c' below are prominently marked 'intended for use in the undertaking approved for ..... for export, etc.--if any excisable goods obtained under this procedure are not duly accounted for as having been utilized in connection with the manufacture and packaging of articles for export or clearances up to twenty five percent of the articles produced or manufactured and allowed to be sold in india on payment of ..... the central excise officer-in-charge of the 100 per cent export oriented undertaking to ensure that all the goods have been fully utilized for manufacture and packaging of articles intended for export or for clearances up to twenty five per, cent of the articles produced or manufactured and allowed to be sold in .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 03 2003 (HC)

Nirmala Gupta and ors. Vs. Municipal Corporation of Delhi

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 2004IAD(Delhi)113; 108(2003)DLT75; 2004(72)DRJ307

..... of plot no. 19 which was under the ownership of the plaintiff. plaintiff submitted that mcd had sought clarification regarding the passage and the clarification was sent to mcd clearly marking the passage. the plaintiff did not receive any communication from mcd till 2.2.1981 regarding granting and refusal of the sanction and, thereforee, vide letter dated 2.2.1981 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 20 1953 (HC)

Gola Narasimhalu Vs. Kodi Narasimham and ors.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR1953Mad932; (1953)2MLJ279

..... number, the result of the election was not affected; because all the candidates were equally affected and their mutual position remained the same as the result of the marking of the ballot papers as without it. this contention has much in commonsense and justice to commend it. but it must fail on the principle of the matter. ..... result of the election had not been affected. in -- 'mahabaleswarappa v. ramachandra rao', air 1936 mad 669 (b), the facts were that 322 ballot papers had been marked by the polling officer with the numbers of the voters on the electoral rolls. all these votes were rejected by the election officer. out of the remaining votes, the successful ..... a ballot paper shall be rejected if it bears anymark by which the elector can be identified.' the contention of respondent 1 before the election commissioner was that in marking the ballot papers with the names and the serial number of the electors the polling officer had violated the mandatory provisions of rule 27-a(1)(a) that .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 19 2012 (HC)

Kuruvila Vs. Sathi Rajan

Court : Kerala

..... allahabad 590, has also been referred to here. there it was held: "a cheque is under the law a negotiable instrument. its negotiability can be destroyed only if it is marked as "not negotiable" on its face; it is not destroyed by its simply being crossed whether generally or specially. the only effect of crossing a cheque is, as stated in ..... the english law it was stated thus: "the law has been summarized thus in halsbury's law of england" 3rd edn. page 183 paras 3, 4, 7: "'account payee'. the marking to a particular account, as "account payee" or "account of a.b.", has no warrant or recognition in the bills of exchange act, 1882. it does not affect the transferability ..... , "not negotiable" and the payee indorses it to his banker for collection, the banker is a holder and indorsee of the cheque. if, then, the collecting banker pays a cheque marked "a/c payee" otherwise than to that account, he does so at his own risk; presumably if he does not keep the payee's account he may refuse to handle .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 22 2018 (HC)

Anselem Lyke Nwoso vs.directorate of Revenue of Intelligence

Court : Delhi

..... nwosu, a resident of nigeria. after a notice under section 50 ndps act was given, from the bag 11 heat sealed transparent polythene packets containing white cloth bags having rubber stamp marking on each of them were recovered. nothing further incriminating was found in the car. since it was getting late in the evening and dark, the raiding team was advised not ..... colour powdery substance weighing 0.962 kg. crl.a.no.284/2016 page 2 of 5 giving positive test of heroin. two samples marked a-1 and a-2 were taken from said bottles/jars which were marked as b-1 and b-2 and were sealed.5. the car in question was found to have been purchased by one avinash sharma .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 28 2014 (HC)

Narcotics Control Bureau Vs. Chen Ching Sung

Court : Delhi

..... the contraband was recovered.21. ms. nikita sharma, learned counsel for the respondent, referred to the decision in alamelu v. state 2011 (1) jcc239to urge that the mere production and marking of a document as exhibit by the court cannot be held to be a due proof of its contents. the said decision was rendered in a case where the offence ..... trolley bag revealed one laptop of dell make which was also wrapped and stitched in a cloth and was given the mark d. the personal effects of the respondent were placed in the same trolley bag and which was given the mark e.5. the respondent was carrying one hand bag and one rucksack bag. nothing incriminating was found in the said ..... the substance and were kept in small polythene pouches and were further put in white paper envelope and were given the markings a-1 and a-2. the remaining substance was wrapped and stitched in white cloth and was given the mark-a. on the rear side of the trolley bag, another packet containing 1 kg of meth was also found. two .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 28 2014 (HC)

Narcotics Control Bureau Vs. Chen Ching Sung

Court : Delhi

..... the contraband was recovered.21. ms. nikita sharma, learned counsel for the respondent, referred to the decision in alamelu v. state 2011 (1) jcc239to urge that the mere production and marking of a document as exhibit by the court cannot be held to be a due proof of its contents. the said decision was rendered in a case where the offence ..... trolley bag revealed one laptop of dell make which was also wrapped and stitched in a cloth and was given the mark d. the personal effects of the respondent were placed in the same trolley bag and which was given the mark e.5. the respondent was carrying one hand bag and one rucksack bag. nothing incriminating was found in the said ..... the substance and were kept in small polythene pouches and were further put in white paper envelope and were given the markings a-1 and a-2. the remaining substance was wrapped and stitched in white cloth and was given the mark-a. on the rear side of the trolley bag, another packet containing 1 kg of meth was also found. two .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 22 1995 (TRI)

A.V. Sampat, Official Liquidator Vs. Dunlop India Ltd. and anr.

Court : Company Law Board CLB

Reported in : (1996)87CompCas398

..... the contention is that there has been unnecessary delay on the part of dunlop since the shares were lodged from september 23, 1988, to october 4, 1988, whereas dunlop was marking time seeking some clarification or the other till september, 1990, i.e., nearly for-two years when the special resolution for voluntary winding up was passed.since dunlop is a ..... delay does not involve abandonment of rights which applies to both the parties. he further stated that if at all there is any delay it is due to the company marking time by raising one frivolous issue or the other. having done that now the company cannot take advantage of its own default. he further stated that when there is a .....

Tag this Judgment!

1850

United States Vs. Boisdore

Court : US Supreme Court

..... of the province, such description as the concession sets forth was sufficient, because large latitude was allowed to his discretion. had that authorized officer certified that the land marked out by him was "at the place granted," then this fact must be taken as prima facie true; the certificate standing on the foot of a deposition. so ..... by sidelines, located near to, but not on, the river. that the topography of that section of country in which the spanish surveyor was directed to survey and mark a tract of land for boisdore was greatly mistaken by the governor who made the grant, is now too manifest for controversy, as no front line can be ..... relation to the admeasurement and survey of lands of value, and on account of the great expense to be incurred previously, he did not proceed to the admeasurement and marking out the boundaries of said tract of land, but notwithstanding transported and conveyed thither a large stock of cattle, and placed thereon a stock keeper named augustus mallet, .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //