Marked - Year 2011 - Judgments

Jul 20 2011 (TRI)

M/S. Renovision Exports (P) Ltd. Joint Registrar of Trade Marks, Trade ...

Court: Intellectual Property Appellate Board IPAB

Decided on: Jul-20-2011

..... the appeal against the order passed by the joint registrar of trade marks on 29 04 2009 the matter came up before us at the ..... 5 of the limitation act 6 section 91 3 of the trade marks act 1999 requires the appellant to file the appeal in the prescribed ..... decision appealed against along with prescribed fees rule 8 of the trade marks rules 2002 requires that the appeal shall be accompanied by copies of .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 11 2011 (TRI)

M/S. New Bharat Rice Mills Vs. the Registrar of Trade Marks and Anothe ...

Court: Intellectual Property Appellate Board IPAB

Decided on: Nov-11-2011

..... that the appellants are not the proprietors of the trade mark taj mahal and their adoption is fraudulent not bonafide ..... advertisement through the trade magazines have also been marked the appellant has also marked the earliest certificate in tm no 338004 dated ..... claiming honest concurrent user distinctly admits that the opponents trade mark is prior but that he had honestly adopted it and .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 14 2011 (TRI)

M/S Mazda Motor Corporation Vs. the Assistant Registrar of Trade Marks ...

Court: Intellectual Property Appellate Board IPAB

Decided on: Sep-14-2011

..... 7 the appellant opposed it the registrar ordered the respondents mark to proceed to registration and disallowed the opposition against that ..... are supplied to the major parts in the country the mark has become distinctive and associated with their goods the respondents ..... there is no explanation from the respondent for adopting the mark mazda with lettering identical to the appellant the adoption is .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 10 2011 (TRI)

Fci, Societe Anonyme Vs. the Senior Examiner of Trade Marks

Court: Intellectual Property Appellate Board IPAB

Decided on: Aug-10-2011

..... recognized that in deciding a question of similarity between two marks the marks have to be considered as a whole so considered we ..... apart from the syllable co in the appellants trade mark the two marks are identical that syllable is not in our opinion ..... conceptually different there is no likelihood of confusion since the cited mark was in connection with pvc wires cables and switchgear whereas .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 01 2011 (TRI)

M/S Alberto Culver Usa Inc. Vs. the Registrar of Trade Marks, Baudhik ...

Court: Intellectual Property Appellate Board IPAB

Decided on: Aug-01-2011

..... in this appeal the learned counsel submitted that the trade marks which had been renewed periodically had lapsed on 13 12 ..... of delay thereafter direction was given to the registrar of trade mark to consider the petitioners application 6 in the present case ..... the restoration petition shall be considered and orders passed restoring the marks unless the registrar finds that a third party will be .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 23 2011 (TRI)

Trade Media Holdings Limited Vs. Deputy Registrar of Trade Marks

Court: Intellectual Property Appellate Board IPAB

Decided on: Sep-23-2011

..... he submitted that several countries have granted registration for the same mark wherever registration is granted it has been given for the ..... in such an important branch of commercial law such as trade marks there should be uniformity as far as possible in all ..... erroneous reasons have persuaded the registrar to refuse registration is the mark by its mere name descriptive to ordinary purchasers of the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 24 2011 (HC)

Roop Trading Company Vs. the Registrar of Trade Marks New Delhi

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Aug-24-2011

..... petitioner s trade mark application in the trade marks journal 2 notice of the petition was issued 3 the ..... of six years and for the reasons stated i e of the mark being not registrable within the meaning of section 9 of the ..... six years ago is not advertising the same in the trade marks journal and seeking mandamus to the respondent to advertise publish the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 17 2011 (TRI)

M/S. Dandi Salt Private Limited Vs. the Registrar of Trade Marks

Court: Intellectual Property Appellate Board IPAB

Decided on: Nov-17-2011

..... had granted the relief of prohibiting stocking and marketing the kitchen salt under the trade mark dandi and directed the authorities concerned under the emblems and names prevention of improper use ..... certain emblem and the fact that applications were pending before the authorities for use of mark dandi under the following directions as the review petitioners have filed complaints objections both .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 16 2011 (TRI)

M/S Ashoka Brushes (India) Vs. the Registrar of Trade Marks Baudhik Sa ...

Court: Intellectual Property Appellate Board IPAB

Decided on: Dec-16-2011

..... no 228 2011 prabha sridevan chairman in this matter the trade marks registry has sent a notice to the appellant for hearing ..... this information is available from the records produced by the trade marks registry today by mr arun kumar examiner in this circumstance ..... to be entertained if after orders are passed by the trade marks registry the appellants are aggrieved they may take appropriate action .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 14 2011 (HC)

Lal Bhambani Vs. the Registrar of Trade Mark

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Oct-14-2011

..... 1989 it is further claimed that in pursuance to the said application the mark was advertised in the trade mark journal on 1st october 1993 that no objections were received and as .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Marked - Judgment Search Results