Marked - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: marked Year: 2002 Page 1 of about 357 results (0.045 seconds)Manogaran M. and ors. Vs. Mark Beedi Manufacturers and anr.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Nov-12-2002
Reported in: (2003)ILLJ733Mad
ordere padmanabhan j 1 heard mr s arunachalam learned counsel appearing for the writ petitioners and mr t r rajagopal...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMark Auto Indus. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Dec-11-2002
Reported in: (2003)(159)ELT311TriDel
1 the issue involved in this appeal filed by m s mark auto indus ltd is whether the cenvat credit of the duty paid on inputs is .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMark Auto Industries Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Apr-18-2002
Reported in: (2002)(82)ECC599
1 these two appeals have been filed against the common order in appeal passed by the commissioner appeals by the...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBoots Company Plc, England and anr. Vs. Registrar of Trade Marks, Mumb ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Mar-21-2002
Reported in: 2002(4)BomCR36; (2002)3BOMLR574; 2002(2)MhLj834
..... in deciding the question of similarity between the two marks the marks have to be considered as a whole it was ..... apply the principles of english law regarding dissimilarity of the marks or the customer knowing about the distinguishing characteristics of the ..... apply the principles of english law regarding dissimilarity of the marks or the customer knowing about the distinguishing characteristics of the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTJaininder JaIn and ors. Vs. Registrar of Trade Marks and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-10-2002
Reported in: 2004(29)PTC160(Del)
..... supported with documents affidavit was also filed of shri amar prakash assistant registrar trade marks trade marks registry mumbai in the two affidavits respondents 1 and 2 have tried to place ..... in favor of the respondents arbitrarily showing them the subsequent proprietors of the trade marks thereby disregarding all judicial precepts and principles additional district judge ludhiana on 7 1 .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDcw Home Products Ltd. Vs. Registrar of Trade Marks and anr.
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Jul-25-2002
Reported in: 2002(6)BomCR751; (2002)4BOMLR468; 2002(4)MhLj810
..... only question therefore is whether the deputy registrar of trade marks has acted in accordance with law in issuing the ..... the deputy registrar for cancelling the registration of the trade mark viz that registration was granted even though notice of opposition ..... in contravention of section 23 whereunder the registrar of trade marks could not have granted registration to the petitioner unless the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTTroikaa Pharmaceutical Ltd. Vs. Asstt. Registrar of Trade Marks
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Mar-22-2002
Reported in: 2002(24)PTC497(Guj)
..... the respondents to follow the provisions of rule 11 3 of trade merchandise marks rules 1959 which inter alia provides for acceptance of fees by postal ..... payment of fees by cheque demand draft rule 11 3 of trade merchandise marks rules 1959 reads as under fees may be paid in cash or ..... by postal order as per rule 11 3 of the trade merchandise marks rules 1959 4 in view of the above no further order is .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTHolographic Security Marking Vs. C.C.E.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: Nov-20-2002
Reported in: (2003)(151)ELT470Tri(Mum.)bai
..... having heard the parties on appeals we proceed to dictate our order 2 holographic security marking systems pvt ltd manufactures holograms the starting point of manufacture of these goods is stamping .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTHotel Land Mark Employees Union, Kanpur and ors. Vs. Up Registrar, Tra ...
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Jan-10-2002
Reported in: 2002(1)AWC554; [2002(92)FLR687]; (2002)1UPLBEC430
r r yadav j 1 heard learned counsel for the petitioners learned standing counsel and sri shekhar kumar appearing on...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRudi Roller Flour Mills (P) Ltd. Vs. Kewal Krishan Kumar
Court: Trademark
Decided on: Jul-25-2002
Reported in: (2002)(25)PTC555Reg
..... continuously extensively without any interruption from any corner whatsoever the applicants further submitted that the mark applied for by them has no relevance with the words shakti bhog of the ..... the applicants under the impugned application is deceptively and confusingly similar to the registered trade mark of the opponents therefore its registration in the name of the applicants would be contrary .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial