Skip to content


Mark - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: mark Sorted by: recent Page 1 of about 588 results (0.407 seconds)
Dec 20 2024 (HC)

Brindavan Hydropower Private Limited Vs. Union Of India

Court: Karnataka

consumers to buy directly from competing generators competition in the market would increase the availability of cheaper and reliable power supply

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 20 2024 (HC)

Bowring Institute Vs. Mr. Sarwik S

Court: Karnataka

..... first appeal no 7641 2024 cpc between bowring institute no 19 st mark s road bangalore 560 001 rep by its secretary appellant by sri ..... nehrunagar sheshadri puram bengaluru 560 020 2 bowring institute no 19 st mark s road bengaluru 560 001 by its chairman 3 sandeep s ps00619 ..... bowring institute no 19 st marks road bengaluru 560 001 2 4 raghavenddra y r pr00423 bowring .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 20 2024 (HC)

Ms. X Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court: Karnataka

1 nc 2024 khc 49110 wp no 55559 of 2017 r in the high court of karnataka at bengaluru dated...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 20 2024 (HC)

Dr Mohankumar M Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court: Karnataka

1 r in the high court of karnataka at bengaluru dated this the20h day of december 2024 before the hon...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 20 2024 (HC)

M/s Asset Reconstruction Company (india) Limited Vs. The Senior Sub Re ...

Court: Karnataka

..... under section 37 the said letter is addressed to district registrar rajajinagara and copy is marked to anti corruption council of india no 27 3 block b ph 4 summit apartment ..... namely sridevi and the guarantors 34 3 a copy of the said order is also marked only to the anti corruption council of india and not to arcil sridevi and or .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 20 2024 (HC)

Asset Reconstruction Company (india) Limited Vs. The Senior Sub Regist ...

Court: Karnataka

..... under section 37 the said letter is addressed to district registrar rajajinagara and copy is marked to anti corruption council of india no 27 3 block b ph 4 summit apartment ..... namely sridevi and the guarantors 34 3 a copy of the said order is also marked only to the anti corruption council of india and not to arcil sridevi and or .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 20 2024 (HC)

M/s. Asset Reconstruction Company (india) Limited Vs. The Senior Sub R ...

Court: Karnataka

..... under section 37 the said letter is addressed to district registrar rajajinagara and copy is marked to anti corruption council of india no 27 3 block b ph 4 summit apartment ..... namely sridevi and the guarantors 34 3 a copy of the said order is also marked only to the anti corruption council of india and not to arcil sridevi and or .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 16 2024 (HC)

Syed Mohammed Ghouse Pasha Quadri Vs. Syed Yaseen Pasha Khadri Since D ...

Court: Karnataka

..... nos 1 to 6 examined defendant no 2 as dw2 and exhibited documents marked as ex d2 to ex d36 and also examined defendant no 3 ..... legal reprenstative of defendant no 9 examined as dw7 and dw8 and got marked ex d30 to ex d 59 12 the trial court on appreciation of ..... appellate court erred in relying upon the document at ex d1 produced and marked by defendant no 8 during the cross examination of pw 1 and both .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 16 2024 (HC)

Sri. Syed Adil Basha Quadri Vs. Syed Azadullah

Court: Karnataka

..... nos 1 to 6 examined defendant no 2 as dw2 and exhibited documents marked as ex d2 to ex d36 and also examined defendant no 3 ..... legal reprenstative of defendant no 9 examined as dw7 and dw8 and got marked ex d30 to ex d 59 12 the trial court on appreciation of ..... appellate court erred in relying upon the document at ex d1 produced and marked by defendant no 8 during the cross examination of pw 1 and both .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 16 2024 (HC)

Syed Mohammed Ghouse Pasha Quadri Vs. Syed Yaseen Pasha Khadri Since D ...

Court: Karnataka

..... nos 1 to 6 examined defendant no 2 as dw2 and exhibited documents marked as ex d2 to ex d36 and also examined defendant no 3 ..... legal reprenstative of defendant no 9 examined as dw7 and dw8 and got marked ex d30 to ex d 59 12 the trial court on appreciation of ..... appellate court erred in relying upon the document at ex d1 produced and marked by defendant no 8 during the cross examination of pw 1 and both .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //