Mahe - Judgment Search Results
Mahe Beach Trading Co. and ors. Vs. Union Territory of Pondicherry and ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Apr-04-1996
Reported in: 1996IVAD(SC)504; JT1996(4)SC45; 1996(3)SCALE306; (1996)3SCC741; [1996]Supp1SCR1
Kirpal, J.1. The appellants are the dealers in petrol and diesel oil in the former French Establishment of Mahe, now in the Union Territory of Pondicherry. The Erstwhile French Establishments in India were divided by the French
Mahes. K.G vs 1. State of Kerala Represented by the Secretary
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Sep-14-2023
PURUSHOTHAMAN THURSDAY, THE 14TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2023 / 23TH BHADRA, 1945 WP(C) NO. 1986 OF 2023 PETITIONER: MAHES, S/O. LATE GOVINDAN MASTER, KOZHISSERY HOUSE, KODUNGALLUR, THRISSUR DISTRICT, PIN - 680664 BY ADV P.R.VENKATESH RESPONDENTS: 1 1.
Mahe Aalam Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Aug-03-2005
Reported in: 2005CriLJ4554
Matched in: Parties Mahe Aalam Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Mahe Beach Trading Company, by Partner B. Kutti Hassan Haji Vs. the Un ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-03-1972
Reported in: (1972)2MLJ213
ORDERT. Ramaprasada Rao, J.1. The petitioner owns an Esso patrol pump in Mahe, in the Union Territory of Pondicherry. The petitioner says that he is basing assessed to sales tax on
Mr. Mahes Gulabrai Joshi Vs. C.i.T(A)
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai
Decided on: Jul-19-2004
Reported in: (2005)96TTJ(Mum.)876
1. This appeal by assessee for A.Y. 1998-99 is directed against the order of CIT(A), Mumbai dated 26.09.2003.2. I have heard the arguments of both the sides and have also perused the records.3. The assessee-appellant has...
Mahes Gulabrai Joshi Vs. Cit(A) Ward 21(1)(3)
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai
Decided on: Jul-19-2004
Reported in: (2005)95ITD300(Mum.)
This appeal by assessee for assessment year 1998-99 is directed against the order of CIT(A), Mumbai dated 26-9-2003.I have heard the arguments of both the sides and have also perused the records.The assessee-appellant has raised four...
Y. Venkateswara Rao Vs. Mahee Handlooms Pvt. Ltd. and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-21-1992
Reported in: [1994]79CompCas206(AP); 1993CriLJ2362
ORDER1. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the Public Prosecutor. 2. This petition is directed under S. 482, Cr.P.C. to call for the records relating to C.C. No. 184/1991 on the file of the...
The Union Territory of Pondicherry, Represented by the Chief Secretary ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-22-1975
Reported in: (1976)2MLJ297
K. Veeraswami, C.J.1. The erstwhile French Establishments in India known as Pondicherry, Karaikkal, Mahe and Yanam, which by the Constitution (14th Amendment) Act, 1962, constitute the Pondicherry Union Territory, were divided by
Province of Bengal Vs. Mahes Missir and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Nov-19-1940
Reported in: AIR1941Cal625
Khundkar, J.1. These are two rules obtained by the Province of Bengal against orders of the Calcutta Improvement Trust Tribunal passed upon references under Section 49 (1), Land Acquisition Act, made by the First Land Acquisition...
Sachhidananda Thakur Vs. Mahes Chandra Das
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: May-09-1923
Reported in: 79Ind.Cas.312
Asutosh Mukerjee, J.1. The question which has been referred for decision under Section 5 of the Court-Fees Act, 1870, relates to the true construction of a rule framed by the Governor-General in Council with reference to...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · drag or use +/− to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free