Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: mahatma gandhi antarrashtriya hindi vishwavidyalaya act 1996 section 6 jurisdiction Court: delhi Page 3 of about 310 results (0.139 seconds)

Chawla Enterprises Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Customs and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 2004(72)DRJ768; 2004(93)ECC175; 2004(175)ELT61(Del)

D.K. Jain, J. 1. Since the pleadings are complete and we have heard learned counsel for the parties at considerable length, we proceed to dispose of the writ petition at this stage itself.2. Challenge in this writ petition is to the final order dated 7 August 2002 passed by the Customs and Central Excise Settlement Commission (for short the `Commission') under section 127C(7) of the Customs Act, 1962, (for short the 'Act').3. The petitioner, a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956 is engaged in the manufacture of wall clocks, table clocks and quartz movements for clocks. For the manufacture of the said goods, falling under Chapter 91 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985, the petitioner has been importing from time to time certain components/raw materials from various parties including one M/s.Wellgain Products Pvt. Ltd., Hong Kong. For the said imports Bills of Entry for home consumption were filed from time to time and the same were assessed under section 46 read with s...

Radhey Shyam Gupta Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 2003VIIAD(Delhi)481; 107(2003)DLT696; 2003(71)DRJ608

..... therein could not be interfered on the ground that the land is already being used for beneficial purpose. this view finds sustenance from a decision of the supreme court in gandhi grah nirman sahkari samiti ltd. vs state of rajasthan : 1993(66)elt47(sc). in that case acquisition was impugned, inter alia, on the ground that land was being utilised for .....

Kartongen Kemi Och Forvaltning Ab and ors. Vs. State Through Cbi

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 2004(72)DRJ693

..... mr. s.k. bhatnagar started participating in the proceedings culminating in the award of contract and the date of signing of the contract by mr. rajiv gandhi is wholly irrelevant, immaterial and irreceivable in evidence not only against the public servants but also against other alleged co-conspirators. thus prosecution can confine its ..... it stated that the agent had helped bofors with local contacts and support within the indian military authorities, within the bureaucracy and within the 'prime minister gandhi's congress party'. it also mentioned that the 'payments to the agents were carried through by transaction to secret bank account in switzerland'. the national as ..... it could explode in the battlefield and prove its credentials. explosion was so powerful that it engulfed the highest political functionary of india, late mr. rajiv gandhi the then prime minister of the country. another casualty was late mr. s.k. bhatnagar, the then defense secretary of government of india. main culprits .....

Roshanara Begum Vs. Union of India

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 61(1996)DLT206; 1996(36)DRJ34

..... that any such approach has been made for any particular colony to be regularised on the same pattern as other colonies have been regularised.(217) in case of gandhi grah nirman samili (supra), the supreme court has already held that acquisition proceedings cannot be quashed on the sole ground that the land owners have raised illegal ..... regularised certain unauthorised colonies and there is no reason why the constructions raised by the petitioner in the land in question should not be regularised . in the case of gandhi grah nirman sahkari samiti ltd, vs stale of rajasthan & others, : 1993(66)elt47(sc) , it has been laid down that the constructions raised on the land ..... the provisions of the delhi development act. we need not repeat the reasoning given in this judgment with which we entirely agree.(139) reference may be also made to gandhi gruh nirman sahkari sumiti ltd v. state of rajasthan & others, : 1993(66)elt47(sc) , where provisions of the rajasthan urban improvement act came up for .....

Sstate Vs. Mohd. Afzal and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 2003VIIAD(Delhi)1; 107(2003)DLT385; 2003(71)DRJ178; 2003(3)JCC1669

..... of the same composition as was the composition of the chemicals in the explosives seized from the deceased terrorists at parliament house. it, thus, stands established that premises a-97, gandhi vihar were let out to accused mohd. afzal. he was in legal and physical possession thereof. it stands established that the chemicals which were recovered from the premises were used ..... not know what was inside the jars but the contents thereof were told to him by the police. he sstate d that he could not read english but could read hindi. he sstate d that seizure memos prepared by the police were read over to him before he had signed the same.60. pw-37, prem chand deposed that he was ..... the taped conversation. on the same day at about 8.00 p.m. a call was found coming on phone no. 9811573506 and this was also taped. the conversation, in hindi, was between a man named shaukat and a woman. he seized the two cassettes on which the two conversation were taped, being exhibit pw-66/1 and pw-66/2 .....

Union of India (Uoi) and ors. Vs. Parshadi and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 2003(69)DRJ751

..... court the period in which the stay remains in operation has to be excluded in computing the period of two years prescribed in section 11-a of the act. in gandhi grah nirman sahkari samiti ltd. v. state of rajasthan, : 1993(66)elt47(sc) , the same ratio of law has been laid down. so, we reject this contention also.'after the ..... by the authorities and no vested right had accrued to the persons whose land was sought to be acquired on the basis of such a circular. 146: in case of gandhi grah nil-man sahkari samiti ltd., : 1993(66)elt47(sc) (supra), one of the contentions raised was that the land sought to be acquired is already being used for public .....

Sanjeev Nanda Vs. the State

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 160(2009)DLT775

..... contradictions in the statements of such witnesses cannot over-throw the prosecution case if such statements find due support from other corroborative material.322. mr. s.s. gandhi, learned senior advocate representing appellants bhola nath and shyam singh rana laid much stress that pw-13 could not have noticed the 'park lane' sticker which was ..... filed by the other two accused.283. mr. dinesh mathur, learned senior advocate represented rajiv gupta in crl. appeal no. 767/2008 while mr. s.s. gandhi, learned senior advocate represented bhola nath and shyam singh rana in crl. appeal no. 871/2008. this common order shall dispose of both the appeals.284. before i ..... that 'in all criminal prosecutions the accused shall enjoy the right to speedy trial'. article 21 of the constitution of india received a wider interpretation in mrs. maneka gandhi v. union of india and anr. : [1978]2scr621 and its horizons were broadened further in hussainara khatoon and ors. v. home secretary, state of bihar air .....

Sushil Kumar vs.pravesh & Ors.

Court : Delhi

..... page 3 of 9 register the case as the complaint discloses a cognizable offence and the entire evidence is not within power and possession of the complainant.6. mr.manish gandhi, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the daughter of the complainant/petitioner was murdered and si vijender, who committed the murder, has committed suicide. entire dowry articles are ..... $~3 * % + in the high court of delhi at new delhi date of decision: august 09, 2017 crl.m.c.1821/2017 sushil kumar ........ petitioner through: mr.manish gandhi and mr.hemant verma, advocates. versus pravesh & ors. ........ respondents through : mr.jogender kumar, advocate for r-1. mr.sushil ahlawat and mr.sushil panwar, advocates for r-2 to r- .....

Vijay Singhal and ors. Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi and anr.

Court : Delhi

..... ourselves that the supreme court in that case was dealing with a case which involved the assassination of a sitting prime minister of this country, i.e., late mrs indira gandhi, and on an appeal preferred by the accused against their conviction by this court, one of the preliminary question which the court was to called upon to deal with was .....

Delhi Metro Rail Corporation Ltd. Vs.delhi Airport Metro Express Priva ...

Court : Delhi

..... delhi. project :airport metro express line contract amel-p1 subject : termination notice under the concession agreement for high speed airport metro express line between new delhi - indira gandhi international airport - dwarka sector 21 ("project") consequent of upon dmrc's event of default ref : a) concession agreement dated august 25, 2008 ("concession agreement") b ..... officer shall publish the date of opening of delhi metro railway or a portion thereof the for public carriage of passengers local newspapers both in english and hindi languages. in fao(os)(comm) no.58/2018 page 60 of 97 rule 23:"opening of a metro railway by the commissioner.-. (1) the ..... based on public- private partnership model for providing high speed metro connectivity with maximum speed of 120 kms per hour between new delhi railway station and indira gandhi international airport, t-3 terminal with further line till section-21 at dwarka with underground section of 15.7 kms and elevated viaduct section of 7 kms .....