Court : Supreme Court of India
..... state government has enacted various legislations that inter alia regulate admission process in various institutions. for instance, jawaharlal nehru krishi vishwavidyalaya adhiniyam, rajiv gandhi prodyogiki vishwavidyalaya adhiniyam, rashtriya vidhi sansathan vishwavidyalaya adhiniyam etc. were established by the state government in exercise of power under entry 25 of concurrent ..... legislation relating to medium of instruction. if legislation relating to imposition of an exclusive medium of instruction in a regional language or in hindi, having regard to the absence of textbooks and journals, competent teachers and incapacity of the students to understand the subjects, is likely ..... . [1963]. supp.1 scr112 in this case, the constitution bench of this court considered whether the state legislature could impose gujarati and/or hindi in devnagari script as exclusive medium of instruction and examination in institutions affiliated to the university and constituent colleges. it was held that:- if .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
..... no.844 of 2010 deserves to be set aside. the same is accordingly set aside. the right of the appellant sadashiv prasad sinha in plot no.2722, exhibition road, ps gandhi maidan, patna, measuring 1289 sq ft is hereby confirmed. in the above view of the matter, while the appeal preferred by sadashiv prasad sinha stands allowed, the one filed by .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.8438 OF2016(Arising out of SLP (C) No.8463 of 2008) KEDAR NATH YADAV APPELLANT Vs. STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS. RESPONDENTS WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO.8440 OF2016(Arising out of SLP(C) No.10731/2008) CIVIL APPEAL NO.8441 OF2016(Arising out of SLP(C) No.11783/2008) CIVIL APPEAL NO.8444 OF2016(Arising out of SLP(C) No.11830/2008) CIVIL APPEAL NO.8446 OF2016(Arising out of SLP(C) No.12360/2008) CIVIL APPEAL NO.8447 OF2016(Arising out of SLP(C) No.12724/2008) CIVIL APPEAL NO.8453 OF2016Arising out of SLP(C)NO.25580 OF2016(Arising out of SLP(C) .CC No.13645/2008 And CIVIL APPEAL NO.8449 OF2016(Arising out of SLP(C) No.22491/2008) JUDGMENT V. GOPALA GOWDA, J.Delay condoned in SLP (C) CC No.13645 of 2008. Leave granted in all the special leave petitions. The present appeals arise out of the impugned final common judgment and order dated 18.01.2008 in W.P. No.23836 (W) of 2006 and connected petitions, passed by the ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
..... the jurisdiction of the court to grant relief. the direct operation of the act upon the rights forms the real test. (id at p.799) 264 in maneka gandhi v. union of india[201]., this court refined this test to mean the direct and inevitable effect of the action impugned. the direct and inevitable effect is that ..... .s. deshmukh : then, notwithstanding the fact that you are considered a man, and notwithstanding the fact that you wear nothing else but saris, you will wear a gandhi cap also. then we have another 'notwithstanding'. notwithstanding that you are a man, notwithstanding that you shall wear nothing but a sari, notwithstanding that you shall also wear a ..... gandhi cap, you will be at liberty to describe yourself as a woman. (laughter) something of that sort, as funny and as amusing, is really the situation so .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
reportable in the supreme court of india civil appellate jurisdiction civil appeal nos. 115-116 of2017(arising out of slp (c) nos. 26523-26524 of2012 secretary mahatama gandhi mission & another appellants versus bhartiya kamgar sena & others respondents with civil appeal nos. 117-118 of2017(arising out of slp (c) nos. 26525-26526 of2012 civil appeal nos. 119-120 .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
..... |m/s. ramraj agro | | | | |m/s.ramraj agro at | |mills. ex- p-1519, | | | | |vendampalai at the rate | |pg. 263-276 of vol.| | | | |of rs.3/- per share from| |61 ca2196dd | | | | |gandhi and others | |challan dt. | | | | |(6,18,000 shares minus | |20.12.1994 | | | | |4000 shares) pw501| | | | | | |one sixth undivided |21-3-199|tmt. n. sasikala |10,87,196|ii |155 | |shares .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
..... in suspended animation or congealed into animal existence without the freshening flow of fair procedure. the meaning of life given by field, j., approved in kharak singh[5]. and maneka gandhi[6]. bears excerption: something more than mere animal existence. the inhibition against its deprivation extends to all those limbs and faculties by which life is enjoyed. the provision equally prohibits ..... .p.[19]. and natasha singh v. cbi[20]..]. 34. in this regard, we may sit in the time machine and refer to a three- judge bench judgment in maneka sanjay gandhi & another v. rani jethmalani[21]., wherein it has been observed that assurance of a fair trial is the first imperative of the dispensation of justice and the central criterion for .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
..... with the mhc(m) and were not tampered with in any manner. a specimen of scalp hair of the prosecutrix was also taken on 24.12.2012 by dr. ranju gandhi, pw-29, and was handed over to pw- 80, si pratibha sharma, vide seizure memo ex.pw-29/a.33. the accused were also subjected to medical examination and ..... be it noted, mr. a.p. singh, learned counsel has filed the translated version of the affidavits and mr. manohar lal sharma, learned counsel has filed the original version in hindi as well as the translated one. at this juncture, mr. raju ramachandran, learned senior counsel who has been appointed as amicus curiae to assist the court, submitted that two aspects ..... the sake of convenience, it is necessary to make a summary of the affidavits.314. accused mukesh, a-2, filed his statement, written in his own hand-writing in hindi, denying his involvement in the occurrence and pleading innocence. he stated that on 17.12.2012, he was picked up from his house at karoli, rajasthan and brought to delhi .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
..... are allowed. the impugned judgments and orders of the high court are set aside. no other submission is urged. there shall, however, be no order as to costs. part a mahatma fule krishi vidyapeeth vs. nagnath baburao 6 mangrule & ors. 47 : the respondent was appointed as an agricultural assistant on a post reserved for the scheduled tribes on 22 july 1996 .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Reportable CRIMINAL/CIVIL APPELLATE/ORIGINAL JURISIDCTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No.67 OF2011Securities and Exchange Board of India Appellant(s) Classic Credit Ltd. versus With Respondent(s) Criminal Appeal Nos. 68 to 73 of 2011 Civil Appeal Nos. 102-103 of 2011 Criminal Appeal No.1096 of 2013 Writ Petition (Crl.) No.67 of 2016 Criminal Appeal No.1450 of 2017 (Arising out of SLP(Crl.) No.3593 of 2011) Civil Appeal No.10729 of 2017 Arising out of SLP(C) No.21394 of 2011 JUDGMENT Jagdish Singh Khehar, CJI.1.2. Leave granted, in all the special leave petitions. Complaints were filed against the private parties herein, for offences punishable under the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 (hereinafter referred to as the SEBI Act). At the time when the complaints were filed under Section 26(2) of the SEBI Act, the concerned accused were to be tried by a Metropolitan Magistrate (or, a 1 Judicial Magistrate of the first class). In this bunch of cases, the ...
Tag this Judgment!