Court : Delhi
Reported in : 112(2004)DLT1
..... has got power of exemption in case to case basis as the central government has allowed construction of a multi-storey building at 5, rajinder prasad road for housing indira gandhi national centre for arts and air force officers mess at zakir hussain marg which may not be in consonance with the master plan as well as the guidelines relied upon ..... ecs/100 sq. mt.(v) setback as per mpd 2001.'it was also contended that multi-storey building at 5, dr. rajinder prasad road has been sanctioned for housing indira gandhi national centre for arts though the said building also falls in the lutyen's bungalow zone, on the basis of these examples it was contended before us that there were .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Reported in : (2005)196CTR(Del)435; 122(2005)DLT370; 2005(83)DRJ102; [2005]278ITR401(Delhi)
..... only when findings are arrived at on the basis of the materials on record and upon compliance of the principles of natural justice.in the celebrated case of smt. maneka gandhi v. union of india, : [1978]2scr621 , the apex court has held (page 626) :'now if this be the test of applicability of the doctrine of natural justice, there can be .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Reported in : 121(2005)DLT207; 2005(82)DRJ653
Manju Goel, J.1. Petitioner No. 1 is a partnership firm. Petitioners 2 to 4 are partners of petitioner No. 1 and petitioner No. 5 is an employee of petitioner No. 1. Petitioner No. 1 is accused No. 1 in complaint case No. 01/04 of 1998 for offence Section 18(a)(i) punishable under Section 27(d) of The Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 (in short the `Act'). The petitioners are in the business of manufacturing drugs.2. On 25.2.1997, a sample of drug known as Ampilox Dry Syrup, Batch No. AS-74896, with manufacturing date December, 1996 and expiry date May, 1998 was collected by the Drug Inspector from premises of M/s. Galaxy Medicos, A-2, DDA Market, Mata Sundri Road, New Delhi, in the presence of the proprietor of the firm. Intimation in form 17 about the collection of the samples and one sealed sample of the drug was handed over to the proprietor. On 25.2.97 one sealed sample portion of the drug was forwarded to the Government Analyst, Delhi. On analysis the sample of the drug was found to ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi
Reported in : (2005)96TTJ(Delhi)1
..... onus on the assessee to show that there was no income. in this connection, a decision of the supreme court in the case of m.s. bose v. k.s. gandhi and ors. (1991) 2 scc 716 was referred to.192. mr. syali's next argument was that the salaries of the expatriates were paid by the assessee (motorola) and the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Reported in : 2007(3)ARBLR353(Delhi)
..... enough to meet such men, and must be triggered against them. in this case, the learned judge to his cost realised what george bernard shaw remarked on the assassination of mahatma gandhi.it is dangerous to be too good.6. the trial court in this case will remind itself of section 35a, c.p.c. and take deterrent action if it is .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Reported in : LC2007(2)396; 2007(35)PTC177(Del)
..... are permitted to use the domain name 'indiatvlive.com' with the disclaimer 'this website has no connection, affiliation or association whatsoever with india tv, the indian hindi news and current affairs television channel' which should appear prominently next to its logo 'indiatvlive'. 144. defendant no. 1 is also directed to file six monthly ..... in that particular combination. the mark 'india tv', does not as contended by learned counsel for the plaintiff, by itself indicate that the same is a hindi news channel. the mark would prima facie show a connection with indian television which is the general nature of the business being carried out by the plaintiff ..... the plaintiffs channel. the plaintiff has also placed on record certain other ratings of the tam people meter system which rates the channel among the top three hindi news channels in india. the plaintiff has also placed reliance on articles/clippings regarding the launch of the plaintiff's channel. 97. learned senior counsel for .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Reported in : 2007(2)CTLJ179(Del)
Gita Mittal, J.1. The present case is a unique case where one governmental authority is complaining of an illegality by a statutory authority. Grievance has been made by the Public Works Department (hereinafter PWD) that the Municipal Corporation of Delhi (hereinafter MCD) has entered into a contract which is in violation of the law laid down by the Apex Court in several judgments and now by a Division Bench of this Court as well.Interesting questions of law have arisen for consideration in the present case. It is not only the law laid down by the Apex Court but also statutory provisions which would require to be considered and also the public policy which is involved.2. It is said that a great city is defined by its history and its people. Delhi is one such city. Known as a city of great resilience, it has been witness to a number of upheavals, battles and natural calamities in its long history, but has always emerged victorious. traveling through Delhi in the 1930s, Robert Byron, a t...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Reported in : 2007(122)ECC7; 2007(148)LC7(Delhi); 2009(235)ELT60(Del)
..... for the export of the consignment containing some shawls, scarfsand kimonos (hereinafter referred to as the 'export material') to england which were deposited at the cargo terminal of the indira gandhi international airport, to be air lifted to england. (c) the export material was inspected by the customs authorities at the airport, who objected to the export of some of the ..... . 1. the respondent no. 1 is union of india through the secretary to the government, ministry of environment and forest. the respondent no. 2 is the collector of customs, indira gandhi international airport. the respondent no. 3 is the state of jammu & kashmir through its chief secretary. the respondent no. 4 is the government of national capital territory of delhi. the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Reported in : 2007(4)ARBLR353(Delhi)
..... had been instituted. the contrary position, that is, where the plaintiff firm was not registered or all partners were not shown in the register of firms, renders proceeding void. (see gandhi & co. v. krishna glass pvt. ltd. air 1987 bom 348).7. it is well settled that a decree obtained by an unregistered partnership is a nullity, and all such proceedings .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Reported in : [2008(116)FLR676]; 2008(3)SLJ80(Delhi)
A.K. Sikri, J.1. The question that arises for consideration in these cases is as to whether 3% reservation under Section 33 of the Persons with Disabilities (Equal Opportunities, Protection of Rights and Full Participation) Act, 1995 {hereinafter referred to as the 'Disability Act'} in the public employment provided in favor of the physically handicapped persons would be available to them even for promotions as well. The Tribunal has, vide the impugned judgment, decided this question in the affirmative. Not satisfied with this opinion of the Tribunal, in these writ petitions the said judgment was assailed by the Government. It would be advisable to take note of the factual matrix under which the aforesaid question arises for consideration from WP (C) No. 11818/04.2. The respondent herein is an Orthopedically handicapped person having 55% disability. He was appointed as LDC in the Northern Railways on 16.6.1972. He got promotions from time to time and has risen to the rank of Office Sup...
Tag this Judgment!