Madhya Pradesh Reorganisation Act 2000 Section 64 - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: madhya pradesh reorganisation act 2000 section 64 Year: 2023 Page 1 of about 311 results (1.779 seconds)In Re Article 370 Of The Constitution
Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Dec-11-2023
..... of name act 2011 350 bombay reorganisation act 1960 351 state of nagaland act 1962 352 north eastern areas reorganisation act 1971 353 assam reorganisation meghalaya act 1969 354 punjab reorganisation act 1966 355 madhya pradesh reorganisation act 2000 356 constitution thirty sixth amendment act 1975 338 .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTOrissa Administrative Tribunal Bar Association Vs. Union Of India
Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Mar-21-2023
..... of the central government would not suffice in this case since section 74 of the madhya pradesh reorganisation act 2000 would specifically provide for the abolition through notification but such a provision is not ..... the union government s statutory power under the administrative tribunals act 64 part d105 the appellants place reliance on the decision of a constitution bench of this .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGovt. Of Nct Of Delhi Vs. Union Of India
Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : May-11-2023
to be read widely in ik saksena v state of madhya pradesh51 a four judge bench of this court held that diu dadra and nagar haveli puducherry and states of arunachal pradesh goa and mizoram which is administered by the central government s report statement of objects and reasons the question of reorganisation of the administrative set up in the union territory of act to say that adaptations made in the general clauses act otherwise than those made under article 372 2 would be b posts after consultation with the union public service commission section 8 stipulates the appointment of a director of the delhi 1 2 and 18 of the state list and entries 64 65 and 66 of list ii insofar as they relate
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM.k. Rajagopalan Vs. Dr. Periasamy Palani Gounder
Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : May-03-2023
code the code is first and foremost a code for reorganisation and insolvency resolution of corporate 85 ins by act 1 pointed out that when din status of the appellant was active compliant he could not have been treated as ineligible 43 resolution applicants section 30 relating to submission of resolution plan section 31 which provides for approval of the resolution plan section various other requirements as may be prescribed by the regulations 64 thus what is left to the majority decision of the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThe State Of Telangana Vs. M/s Tirumala Constructions
Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Oct-20-2023
down by this court in the case of state of madhya pradesh v m v narasimhan hereafter m v narasimhan 28 by this court in the case of state of madhya pradesh v m v narasimhan hereafter m v narasimhan 28 which of maharashtra vat act it was highlighted that the amendment act was brought into force on 15 04 2017 the central that restitution 14 1975 3 scr22015 1988 supp 2 scr43416 2000 supp 3 scr18517 2011 4 scr73918 2021 15 scr9619 1964 30 it is further submitted that absence of specifically inserting section 19 in the constitution makes no difference it is still applied universally it will lead to unimaginable chaos 69 section 64 of the gujarat vat act requires the dealer to preserve
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRamkrishna Forgings Limited Vs. Ravindra Loonkar, Resolution Professio ...
Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Nov-21-2023
regulations under the enactment 45 certain foreign jurisdictions allow resolution reorganisation plans to be challenged on grounds of fairness and equity arrangement can be challenged under the united kingdom s insolvency act 1986 is that it unfairly prejudices the interests of a learned counsel for the parties 2 the present appeal under section 622 of the insolvency and bankruptcy code 2016 hereinafter referred 2019 12 scc150 the relevant being at paragraphs 52 59 64 and committee of creditors of essar steel india ltd v
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTG. Manjunatha Vs. The State Of Karnataka
Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Dec-20-2023
by including beda budga jangam in the state of andhra pradesh insofar as the state of mysore is concerned certain castes 19 after about 4 years the petitioner again springs into action this time applies for a fresh caste certificate before the said case juvenile justice cadre and protection of children act 2000 section 49 and section 7a and other provisions of the 1992 the act contemplates for issuing the caste certificate under section 4 a of the act further under rule 3 a
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSri. Peter J R Prabhu Vs. The State Of Karnataka
Court : Karnataka
Decided on : May-22-2023
a full bench of andhra pradesh high court in andhra pradesh steel wool industries cooperative society limited vs labour court24 at subject to regulation the directive principles enjoin the state to reorganise the economic system by law or administrative means and the being any repugnancy of the kind because firstly the impugned act provides for compulsive transfer by the competent authority in favour state the enabling provision in this regard i e sub section 3 of section 1 reads the provisions of this act not keep in mind the value of whatever constructions the 64 air1951bom 355 65 air1962sc723 106 wp no 11158 2013 c
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSri Clarence Pais Vs. The State Of Karnataka
Court : Karnataka
Decided on : May-22-2023
another perspective to the same a full bench of andhra pradesh high court in andhra pradesh steel wool industries cooperative society subject to regulation the directive principles enjoin the state to reorganise the economic system by law or administrative means and the that article 300a was inserted by the constitution 44th amendment act 1978 by practically reinserting article 31 1 therefore right to already mentioned above the act keeps in view the vulnerable sections of mulagenidars kind throughout the state in a particular region not keep in mind the value of whatever constructions the 64 air1951bom 355 65 air1962sc723 106 wp no 11158 2013 c
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTState Of U.p . Vs. Baleshwar Singh .
Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Nov-09-2023
learned senior counsel appearing for the appellants state of uttar pradesh his submission is that a peculiar situation has been created respondent baleshwar singh be cancelled to say the least the action of the state of uttar pradesh of addressing the letter was given effect exactly 23 years back on 9th november 2000 today we have a case of the first respondent baleshwar
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT