Madhya Pradesh Reorganisation Act 2000 Section 64 - Judgment Search Results

M.P. State Electricity Board Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : JT2006(8)SC629; 2006(9)SCALE194; (2006)10SCC736

..... costs civil formation of boards division of assets and liabilities madhya pradesh reorganisation act 2000 sections 2 37 42 43 58 58 1 58 2 58 ..... b as against 88 of liabilities allocated to madhya pradesh the revenues allocated is 64 c the order of the central government has ..... consumption 77 23 installed capacity 67 33 revenue generation 64 36 we have noticed hereinbefore that at one point of .....

The District Industries Association, Bilaspur Vs. State of Chhattisgar ...

Court : Chhattisgarh

Reported in : 2002(1)MPHT4(CG)

the scheme to such judge of the high court of madhya pradcsh as may be nominated in this behalf by the p no 3634 99 before the high court of madhya pradesh which was dismissed by the division bench on 13 8 mind the provisions of section 59 of the m p reorganisation act 2000 and the fact that each individual unit obtained filed a w p no 2717 2000 against the impugned action of the respondent corporation and the hon ble high court ble high court finally decided the petition on 8 7 2000 with a direction that the petitioner may place better offer on 28 2 2001 after the action of corporation under section 29 of the act the borrower firm has filed a

The State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Lafarge Dealers Association

Court : Supreme Court of India

is whether the industrial unit in the reorganised state of madhya pradesh and under the new state of chhattisgarh would continue both the states i e the reorganised state of madhya pradesh and the new state of chhattisgarh as if the unified apply to the territories forming part of it after its reorganisation division as a result of bifurcation some areas that were of chhattisgarh by the madhya pradesh reorganisation act 2000 reorganisation act for short on exemption or benefit of deferment of sales to sections 84 and 85 of the bihar reorganisation act 2000 we would like to reproduce paragraphs 26 27 28 29 regards the inter state character of inter state transactions 19 section 86 of the reorganisation act states that in case any

In Re Article 370 Of The Constitution

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... of name act 2011 350 bombay reorganisation act 1960 351 state of nagaland act 1962 352 north eastern areas reorganisation act 1971 353 assam reorganisation meghalaya act 1969 354 punjab reorganisation act 1966 355 madhya pradesh reorganisation act 2000 356 constitution thirty sixth amendment act 1975 338 .....

A.K. Shrivastava Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : 2002(3)MPHT1

..... tribunal 3 the petitioners have also challenged the constitutional validity of section 74 of the madhya pradesh reorganisation act 2000 for short the act of 2000 in the alternative it has been prayed that if the ..... government of india any other state government the supreme court or the high court 64 shri rajendra tiwari learned senior advocate has further contended that since the controversy was .....

G.K. Gupta and Others Vs. the Managing Director Cidc and Others

Court : Chhattisgarh

day of december 2002 as the date on which the madhya pradesh state road transport corporation shall cease to function and 33 learned single judge of the high court of madhya pradesh in pramod limaye supra held as under 11 from the sub section 3 of section 58 of the madhya pradesh reorganisation act 2000 28 of 2000 the central govt has appointed section 3 of section 58 of the madhya pradesh reorganisation act 2000 28 of 2000 the central govt has appointed the 58 of the madhya pradesh reorganisation act 2000 28 of 2000 the central govt has appointed the 31st day of december 2002 published in the gazette of india extraordinary part ii section 3 sub section ii dated 26th december 2002 issued under

Tamil Nadu Government All Department Watchman and Basic Servants Assoc ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (2005)2MLJ570

central government has no option but issue a notification in madhya pradesh case the notification abolishing the tribunal was made by the notification abolishing the tribunal was made by the madhya pradesh government and it was quashed on the ground that the in this case since section 74 of the madhya pradesh reorganisation act 2000 would specifically provide for the abolition through notification of sub section 2 of section 4 of the said act the central government could exercise the jurisdiction and power to the central government dated 18 8 1994 and 17 1 2000 the central government informed the state government that the proposal such tribunal except in accordance with the provisions of sub section 2 of section 4 of the act the central government v union of india 2002 m p l s r 646 relating to the abolition of tribunal held that it is

Utkal Hydrocarbons and Etc. Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and ors.

Court : Chhattisgarh

Reported in : AIR2006Chh36; 2006(2)MPHT68(CG)

report of the third committee the industries commissioner government of madhya pradesh issued an order dated 23 2 1989 redistributing the of the new industrial policy of the government of madhya pradesh declared in october 1988 he further submitted that the revised the state of chhattisgarh was constituted by the madhya pradesh reorganisation act 2000 complaining of arbitrary distribution of by products of to further increase to 600 m t per month but actually the production of the bhilai steel plant is much lower of chhattisgarh was constituted by the madhya pradesh reorganisation act 2000 complaining of arbitrary distribution of by products of the bhilai

Ashok Kumar Yadav Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : 2003(3)MPHT391

entire staff of the tribunal to the high court of madhya pradesh vide government of madhya pradesh general administration department order the high court of madhya pradesh vide government of madhya pradesh general administration department order no f a 4 8 2003 while on the time machine after the state madhya pradesh reorganisation act 2000 came into being the state administrative tribunal was on the time machine after the state madhya pradesh reorganisation act 2000 came into being the state administrative tribunal was abolished the time machine after the state madhya pradesh reorganisation act 2000 came into being the state administrative tribunal was abolished by injury held appellant is therefore liable to be convicted under section 324 of i p c sentence of 3 years imprisonment

Avtar Singh Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (Now C.G.)

Court : Chhattisgarh

..... madhya pradesh reorganisation act 2000 no 28 of 2000 the chief justice of the high court of madhya pradesh at jabalpur has transferred this appeal to this court in accordance with sub sections 1 2 of section 30 of the madhya pradesh reorganisation act 2000 ..... imposed upon the appellant under section 28 of the arms act is just and proper and no interference is called for 64 on close scrutiny of the .....