Court : Delhi
G. Rohini, C.J. 1. Though based on different set of facts, the controversy in all the petitions centers on common issues relating to the exercise of legislative power and executive control in the administration of National Capital Territory of Delhi (NCTD). 2. The parties to the writ petitions and the orders impugned have been set out in the following Table so as to get a glimpse of the controversy involved in each writ petition. Sl.No.Writ PetitionPartiesImpugned order/action1.W.P.(C) No.5888/2015GNCTD vs. UOINotifications dated 21.05.2015 and 23.07.2014 issued by the Govt. of India, Ministry of Home Affairs empowering the Lt. Governor to exercise the powers in respect of matters connected with 'Services' and directing the ACB Police Station not to take cognizance of offences against officials of Central Government.2.W.P.(C) No.7887/2015Rajender Prashad vs. GNCTD and Ors.Notification dated 11.08.2015 issued by the Directorate of Vigilance, GNCTD under the Commissions of Inquiry Act, 1...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: April 12,2017 + W.P.(C) 2924/2014 SARIN MEMORIAL LEGAL AID FOUNDATION ........ Petitioner Present: Mr. P.S. Patwalia, Sr. Adv. with Mr. P.S. Bindra, Mr. Ashok Kr.Mahajan, Mr.Archit Upadhyay, Advs. for the petitioners. Ms. Anjana Gosain, Adv. with Mr. Vishu Agrawal, Adv. for Union of India. Mr. Gopal Subramaniam, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Manu Nair, Mr. Anuj Berry, Mr. Siddhanth Kochhar, Adv. for R-8. Mr. A.S. Chandhiok, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Manmeet Arora, Ms. Princy Ponnan, Ms. Nidhi Mohan Parashar, Advs. for the U.T. of Chandigarh. Mr.Puneet Bali, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Ajay Bansal, Mr.Gaurav Yadav, Mr.S.Bhalla and Mr.Y.Bhalla, Advs. for State of Punjab. Mr. Sudipto Sircar, Adv. with Mr. A.D.N. Rao, Adv. for ASI. W.P.(C) Nos.2924/2014 & 2999/2014 Page 1 of 169 Versus STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. + W.P.(C) 2999/2014 & CM No.9439/2014 AALOK JAGGA Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS :1. CORAM: HON'...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: April 12,2017 + W.P.(C) 2924/2014 SARIN MEMORIAL LEGAL AID FOUNDATION ........ Petitioner Present: Mr. P.S. Patwalia, Sr. Adv. with Mr. P.S. Bindra, Mr. Ashok Kr.Mahajan, Mr.Archit Upadhyay, Advs. for the petitioners. Ms. Anjana Gosain, Adv. with Mr. Vishu Agrawal, Adv. for Union of India. Mr. Gopal Subramaniam, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Manu Nair, Mr. Anuj Berry, Mr. Siddhanth Kochhar, Adv. for R-8. Mr. A.S. Chandhiok, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Manmeet Arora, Ms. Princy Ponnan, Ms. Nidhi Mohan Parashar, Advs. for the U.T. of Chandigarh. Mr.Puneet Bali, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Ajay Bansal, Mr.Gaurav Yadav, Mr.S.Bhalla and Mr.Y.Bhalla, Advs. for State of Punjab. Mr. Sudipto Sircar, Adv. with Mr. A.D.N. Rao, Adv. for ASI. W.P.(C) Nos.2924/2014 & 2999/2014 Page 1 of 169 Versus STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. + W.P.(C) 2999/2014 & CM No.9439/2014 AALOK JAGGA Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS :1. CORAM: HON'...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * + Date of Decision:17. h August, 2017 % W.P.(C.) No.7367/2012 PAWAN KR. KALRA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Ashwin Vaish & Mr.Vinod Pandey, Advocates. versus THE REGISTRAR GENERAL, DELHI HIGH COURT & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Sanjoy Ghose, ASC for DHC. Mr.Arun K. Sharma, Advocate for R-3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI REKHA PALLI, J.(ORAL) 1. The... Petitioner who is presently a Joint Registrar in the Delhi High Court has, by way of the present writ petition, challenged the decision dated 04.08.2008 of the Selection Committee, vide which the... Petitioner was superseded for appointment to the post of Assistant Registrar by the Respondent Nos.2 & 3. W.P.(C.) No.7367/2012 Page 1 of 21 2. The brief facts relevant for the adjudication of the present petition are, that the... Petitioner joined services of this Court as a Senior Stenographer in the year 1994 and was promoted as an Administrative...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
* % + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:22. d February, 2019. CS(COMM) 1246/2018 & IAs No.16056/2018 (u/O XXXIX R- 1&2 CPC) & 16060/2018 (u/O II R-2 CPC) LIBERTY HOUSE GROUP PTE LTD. ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. A.S. Chandhiok, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Krishendu Datta, Ms. Sweta Kabra, Mr. Aly Mirza & Ms. Priya Agarwal, Advs. Versus STATE BANK OF INDIA & ORS. ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Sanjay Bhatt & Mr. Sumit Nagpal, Advs. for D-1&4. AND CS(COMM) 1247/2018 & IAs No.16061/2018 (u/O XXXIX R- 1&2 CPC) & 16065/2018 (u/O II R-2 CPC) LIBERTY HOUSE GROUP PTE LTD. ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. A.S. Chandhiok, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Krishendu Datta, Ms. Sweta Kabra, Mr. Aly Mirza & Ms. Priya Agarwal, Advs. Versus STATE BANK OF INDIA & ORS. ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Abhinav Vasisht, Sr. Advs. with Ms. Misha, Mr. Vaijayant Paliwal and Ms. Charu Bansal, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW The application of the plaintiff in both t...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
$~12, 14 to 16 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:27. h February, 2019 12 + 14 + 15 + BSES RAJDHANI POWER LIMITED O.M.P. (COMM) 268/2016 O.M.P. (COMM) 182/2016, 267/2016, 268/2016 & 300/2016 BSES RAJDHANI POWER LTD. O.M.P. (COMM) 182/2016 Through: Mr. Manish ........ Petitioner Srivastava, Ms. Deboshree Mukherjee and Mr. Rahul Gupta, Advocates. (M:9971635549) versus M/S KANOHAR ELECTRICALS LTD. & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Bhuvan Gugnani, Mr. S. C. Sharma, Mr. Saurabh Soni, Mr. Kshitiz Rao, Mr. Mannat Singh, Ms. Mythili Srinivasamurhty and Mr. Aditya Shrotriya, Advocates for R-1. (M:9810126664 & 9599248485) WITH O.M.P. (COMM) 267/2016 BSES YAMUNA POWER LIMITED Through: Appearance not given. versus ........ Petitioner KANOHAR ELECTRICALS LIMITED & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Bhuvan Gugnani, Mr. S. C. Sharma, Mr. Saurabh Soni, Mr. Kshitiz Rao, Mr. Mannat Singh, Ms. Mythili Srinivasamurhty and Mr. Aditya Shrotriya, Advocates for R-1. Mr. Hars...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
$~12, 14 to 16 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:27. h February, 2019 12 + 14 + 15 + BSES RAJDHANI POWER LIMITED O.M.P. (COMM) 268/2016 O.M.P. (COMM) 182/2016, 267/2016, 268/2016 & 300/2016 BSES RAJDHANI POWER LTD. O.M.P. (COMM) 182/2016 Through: Mr. Manish ........ Petitioner Srivastava, Ms. Deboshree Mukherjee and Mr. Rahul Gupta, Advocates. (M:9971635549) versus M/S KANOHAR ELECTRICALS LTD. & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Bhuvan Gugnani, Mr. S. C. Sharma, Mr. Saurabh Soni, Mr. Kshitiz Rao, Mr. Mannat Singh, Ms. Mythili Srinivasamurhty and Mr. Aditya Shrotriya, Advocates for R-1. (M:9810126664 & 9599248485) WITH O.M.P. (COMM) 267/2016 BSES YAMUNA POWER LIMITED Through: Appearance not given. versus ........ Petitioner KANOHAR ELECTRICALS LIMITED & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Bhuvan Gugnani, Mr. S. C. Sharma, Mr. Saurabh Soni, Mr. Kshitiz Rao, Mr. Mannat Singh, Ms. Mythili Srinivasamurhty and Mr. Aditya Shrotriya, Advocates for R-1. Mr. Hars...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
$~12, 14 to 16 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:27. h February, 2019 12 + 14 + 15 + BSES RAJDHANI POWER LIMITED O.M.P. (COMM) 268/2016 O.M.P. (COMM) 182/2016, 267/2016, 268/2016 & 300/2016 BSES RAJDHANI POWER LTD. O.M.P. (COMM) 182/2016 Through: Mr. Manish ........ Petitioner Srivastava, Ms. Deboshree Mukherjee and Mr. Rahul Gupta, Advocates. (M:9971635549) versus M/S KANOHAR ELECTRICALS LTD. & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Bhuvan Gugnani, Mr. S. C. Sharma, Mr. Saurabh Soni, Mr. Kshitiz Rao, Mr. Mannat Singh, Ms. Mythili Srinivasamurhty and Mr. Aditya Shrotriya, Advocates for R-1. (M:9810126664 & 9599248485) WITH O.M.P. (COMM) 267/2016 BSES YAMUNA POWER LIMITED Through: Appearance not given. versus ........ Petitioner KANOHAR ELECTRICALS LIMITED & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Bhuvan Gugnani, Mr. S. C. Sharma, Mr. Saurabh Soni, Mr. Kshitiz Rao, Mr. Mannat Singh, Ms. Mythili Srinivasamurhty and Mr. Aditya Shrotriya, Advocates for R-1. Mr. Hars...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
$~12, 14 to 16 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:27. h February, 2019 12 + 14 + 15 + BSES RAJDHANI POWER LIMITED O.M.P. (COMM) 268/2016 O.M.P. (COMM) 182/2016, 267/2016, 268/2016 & 300/2016 BSES RAJDHANI POWER LTD. O.M.P. (COMM) 182/2016 Through: Mr. Manish ........ Petitioner Srivastava, Ms. Deboshree Mukherjee and Mr. Rahul Gupta, Advocates. (M:9971635549) versus M/S KANOHAR ELECTRICALS LTD. & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Bhuvan Gugnani, Mr. S. C. Sharma, Mr. Saurabh Soni, Mr. Kshitiz Rao, Mr. Mannat Singh, Ms. Mythili Srinivasamurhty and Mr. Aditya Shrotriya, Advocates for R-1. (M:9810126664 & 9599248485) WITH O.M.P. (COMM) 267/2016 BSES YAMUNA POWER LIMITED Through: Appearance not given. versus ........ Petitioner KANOHAR ELECTRICALS LIMITED & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Bhuvan Gugnani, Mr. S. C. Sharma, Mr. Saurabh Soni, Mr. Kshitiz Rao, Mr. Mannat Singh, Ms. Mythili Srinivasamurhty and Mr. Aditya Shrotriya, Advocates for R-1. Mr. Hars...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :11. 02.2019 Pronounced on :27. 03.2019 W.P.(C)No.11572/2017 & CM No.47153/2017 MAX VENTURES INVESTMENTS HOLDINGS PVT. LTD. (FORMERLY KNOWN AS DYNAVEST INDIA PVT.LTD) Through : Sh. Ajay Vohra, Sr. Advocate with Sh. Gaurav Jain, Sh. Aniket. D. Agrawal and Ms. Deepika Agarwal, Advs. ........ Petitioner versus INCOME TAX OFFICER & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Sh. Asheesh Jain, Sr. Standing Counsel with Sh. Sanjay Kumar, Jr. Standing Counsel and Sh. Dushyant Sarna, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J.1. This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, challenges a reassessment notice under Sectionsof the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act hereafter) issued to the writ petitioner.2. The petitioner (hereafter assessee) is a private limited company incorporated in India under the provisions of the Companies Act, 1956 is inter alia engaged in the business ...
Tag this Judgment!