Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: madhya pradesh reorganisation act 2000 section 40 arrears of taxes Court: delhi Page 1 of about 81 results (0.099 seconds)

Goruk Mal Vs. Himachal Pradesh Government

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 5(1969)DLT191

..... of article 14 of the constitution.the argument was repelled by their lordships of the supreme court in the following words:- 'theplea that there is infringement of article 14 of the constitution is advanced on the sole ground that in the reorgainsed state of madhya pradesh formed under the states reorganisation act. ..... the net effect of all this was that in the constituent regions the bhopal state agricultural income-tax act 1953, continued in force while in the remaining territory of the state of madhya pradesh there was no law providing for levy of tax on agicultural income. ..... prima faice, a differential treatment is accorded by the state of madhya pradesh to persons carrying on agricultural operations in the bhopal region because the state subjects them to pay tax on ag cultural income, which is nto imposed upon agricultural income earned in the rest of the state. ..... agricultural income-tax is levied within the territory of the former state of bhopal and nto in the rest of the territories of madhya pradesh. ..... the transferred territories, being part of punjab, the provisions of the punjab sales-tax act, 1948, were applicable therein and by virtue of section 88 of the punjab reorganisation act. .....

Radhey Shyam Sawhney and ors. Vs. Bawa Joginder Singh Bhalla and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : AIR1969Delhi142; 5(1969)DLT82; ILR1969Delhi19

..... but since they have nto yet been adapted under section 120 of the states reorganisation act for the other territories of the 'corresponding new state' (that is, the present state of madhya pradesh) they are nto operative and cannto regulate the procedure of the civil courts there. ..... , and which were in force in the former state of madhya pradesh as it existed before the reorganisation of states on 1-11-1956, were enforceable in that territory of the new madhya pradesh which up to 21-10-1950 was called the part b state of madhya bharat. ..... section 54 of the states reorganisation act, 1956 falling in part v of that act was held nto to apply to the rules made under section 122, civil p. ..... , was, according to the reported decision, a piece of delegated or subordinate legislation and was governed by section 119 and nto by section 54 of the states reorganisation act. ..... shri sehgal has cited a single bench decision of the madhya pradesh high court by shiv dayal, j, in munnilal kailash chandra v. ..... which existed prior to november 1, 1956) continued to be operative in those territories of the new madhya pradesh state even after november 1, 1956. ..... in that view of the matter, the rules made by the high court of the 'corresponding state' of madhya pradesh (that is, the former m. p. ..... all that has been argued is that these rules relate to practice and procedure in courts subordinate to the high court and, thereforee, section 7 of the delhi high court act does nto continue them. .....

Sarda Energy and Minerals Ltd. Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

..... the madhya pradesh reorganisation act, 2000 (reorganisation act) came into force with effect from 1st november 2000 whereby the state of chhattisgarh was ..... terms of section 79 of the reorganisation act, an adaptation of laws order, 2001 effective 1st november 2000 was notified. ..... it was expressly stated to the contrary in terms of section 79 of the reorganisation act. ..... are opposed to each other, there is a lis and prima facie, and in the absence of anything in the statute to the contrary it is the duty of the authority to act judicially and the decision of the authority is a quasi-judicial act; and(ii) that if a statutory authority has power to do any act which will prejudicially affect the subject, then, although there are not two parties apart from the authority and the contest is between the authority ..... with the order dated 4th february 1999 of the mines tribunal is devoid of merit as it defeats the very object of section 30 of the mmdr act, which permits a party aggrieved by a decision rejecting its application for grant of pl to challenge such rejection by way of a revision petition before the mines tribunal exercising quasi- ..... there can be no manner of doubt that the mines tribunal is discharging quasi-judicial functions while exercising its powers under section 30 of the mmdr act inasmuch as it is deciding disputes between two parties: one of whom is the challenger to the decisions of the government and the other the defender of such decisions which are in its ..... of taxes, tezpur .....

Fitwell Engineers Vs. Financial Commissioner, Delhi Administration and ...

Court : Delhi

Reported in : [1975]35STC66(Delhi)

..... our conclusion in the present case is that the respondent cannot be treated as a registered dealer in the new state of madhya pradesh on the strength of the registration certificate issued to the respondent before coming into force of the states reorganisation act as no place of business in that area was specified in the registration certificate.16. ..... the conclusion, thereforee, is that the registered dealers who purchase goods specified in their registration certificates under section 5(2)(a)(ii) free from payment of sales tax contravene the second proviso to section 5(2)(a)(ii) when they resell the goods so purchased tax-free outside delhi either directly or use them as raw materials in the manufacture of goods and sell the manufactured goods outside delhi. ..... (4) a usage, with few exceptions, had grown in delhi from 1951 to 1973 by which sales tax authorities acting under section 5(2)(a)(ii) had allowed registered dealers to sell goods purchased by them tax-free even outside delhi without attracting the consequences provided for in the second proviso thereto. ..... ramesh chandra dey : [1962]1scr986 brings out the working of a single point levy of sales tax in the following words :what section 15 does, is to grant an additional exemption in respect of sales in which the goods, though sold to a registered dealer, are meant for resale in the state itself. .....

i.D. Garg and ors. Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : ILR1977Delhi517B

..... interpretation in another line of decisions, inter alia, in the context of the provisions of section 115 of the states reorganisation act, 1956. ..... in section 115 of the states reorganisation act, ..... in the petition, as indeed at the hearing, particularly if the application of the rules contained in the september 59 memorandum to class i officers of the ministry of irrigation and power after the enforcement of the december 59 memorandum constituted an act of hostile discrimination, in that the rules contained in the december 59 memorandum were made applicable to other service in the ministry, and as to the validity of determination of seniority of some of the petitioners, who belong to the scheduled caste ..... court in the case of state of madhya pradesh & ors. v. ..... pathan & 0thers(4), the question as to the meaning of the expression 'condition' arose in the context of clause 5(1) of the industrial employment (standing orders) act, 1946, gajendragadkar, j' as he then was, and who spoke for the court, held, that even though the dictionary meaning of the word 'condition' was a provision or a stipulation, a provision or a stipulation as to ..... leave and holidays would necessarily include a provision for the quantum of holidays and leave and that for the purpose of construing clause 5 of the schedule to the industrial employment (standing orders) act, 1946, the expression 'condition' must be reasonably construed in a 'broad' and 'liberal' sense rather than in a narrow sense. .....

Jayaswal Neco Industries Ltd. Vs. Sarda Energy and Minerals Ltd and O ...

Court : Delhi

..... particularly in view of the provisions of the adaptation of laws order, 2001 which was notified in terms of section 79 of madhya pradesh re-organization act, 2000, the state of chhattisgarh is bound by the order of the state of m.p. ..... similarly, the preferential right claimed by the appellant under section 11(2) of the act is also untenable since its applications dated 22.05.1990 and 28.09.1993 for grant of pl though were received earlier, both the said applications were rejected by the state of madhya pradesh and the same attained finality by the date of the fresh consideration by the state of chhattisgarh. ..... informed the state of chhattisgarh that on the basis of its application dated 25.04.1995, the state of madhya pradesh had already granted pl in its favour on 31.12.1997 and that the approval of the central government and the clearance as required under section 2 of the forest (conservation) act, 1980 were granted on 06.10.1998 and 22.05.2003 respectively. ..... (ii) the state of chhattisgarh was bound by the decisions already taken by the state of madhya pradesh in terms of section 79 of the reorganization act read with adaptation of laws order, 2001. ..... while so, the state of chhattisgarh, which was formed on 01.11.2000 by virtue of madhya pradesh reorganization act, 2000, took up the issue of grant of pl over the boria tibbu area treating the applications of both jayaswal neco ltd. .....

Madhya Pradesh State Electricity Board Vs. Punjab and Sind Bank and or ...

Court : Delhi

..... before coming into force of the madhya pradesh reorganization act, 2000, madhya pradesh electricity board (mpeb) was existing in the undivided state of madhya pradesh. ..... in terms of madhya pradesh reorganization act, 2000, state of chattisgarh claims to be a necessary/interested party in the matter and submits that it has moved an application for impleadment before drat, which is ..... with the enactment of the act, the state of madhya pradesh was divided into two states and a new state ..... in these circumstances, the learned counsels appearing for state of madhya pradesh, state of chhattisgarh and also the counsel for the punjab and sind bank were heard ..... this argument was pressed by the madhya pradesh state electricity board as negatived by the ..... chhattisgarh state electricity board and the state of madhya pradesh constituted a separate electricity board i.e. ..... in 2008, the respondent bank instituted proceedings under section 19 of the recovery of debts due to banks and financial institutions act, 1993 (oa no.92/2008) claiming `64.99 crores together with cost and interest at the rate of 15% ..... contentions urged before the drat were that the amounts claimed could not be said to be 'debt' in terms of the definition contained in section 2(g) of the recovery of debts due to banks and financial institutions act, 1993 and the same could not be adjudicated under the said act. ..... in terms of section 58(4) of the act, the central government was empowered to make an order for distribution of assets and .....

Jayaswal Neco Industries Ltd. Vs. Sarda Energy and Minerals Ltd. and O ...

Court : Delhi

..... 01.11.2000 by virtue of madhya pradesh reorganization act, 2000 was the subject matter of lpa nos.202/2011 and 205/2011. 5. ..... court to take notice of the change in law would constitute an error apparent on the face of the record, the said proposition, according to us, has no application to the case on hand since the change in law by way of insertion of section 10a of the act has been affected only on the date of the judgment in lpa nos.202/2011 and 205/2011 whereas the rights of the parties were crystallized on the date of the order of the mines tribunal ..... the instant review petitions seeking review of the said judgment dated 24.02.2015 came to be filed primarily on the ground that section 10a of the mines and minerals (development and regulation) amendment act, 1957, which has been inserted by amendment dated 27.03.2015 w.e.f. ..... it was also decided by the state of chhattisgarh on 17.04.2015 that in view of section 10a(1), prospecting licence cannot be granted to sarda energy and minerals ltd. ..... 12.01.2015 thereby inserting section 10a into the mines and minerals (development and regulation) act, 1957 (for short the act'), all applications for pl received prior to the date of commencement of the amendment act i.e. ..... after the judgment was reserved and before the judgment was pronounced could not be brought to the notice of this court and consequently the judgment was rendered without taking into consideration the provisions of section 10a of the act as inserted by the amendment act. 8. .....

Raj Electricals (Regd.) Vs. Bses Rajdhani Power Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 2007(3)ARBLR449(Delhi); 142(2007)DLT687

..... the madhya pradesh vidyut sudhar adhiniyam, 2000 (madhya pradesh act no. ..... this schedule and delhi electricity reforms act, 2000 were saved by section 185 of the electricity act, 2003, so a minimum notice of 12 months was required. ..... power to grant licenses has been given to the commission under section 20 of the delhi electricity reforms act, 2000 and section 20 is on the same lines as section 3 of the indian electricity act, 1910. ..... shall, in so far as it is not inconsistent with the provisions of this act, be deemed to have been done or taken under the corresponding provisions of this act;(b) the provisions contained in sections 12 to 18 of the indian electricity act, 1910 (9 of 1910) and rules made there under shall have effect until the rules under sections 67 to 69 of this act are made;(c) the indian electricity rules, 1956 made under section 37 of the indian electricity act, 1910 (9 of 1910) as it stood before such repeal shall continue to be in force ..... during the arguments, the counsel for petitioner submitted that the agreement between the petitioner and the respondent was governed by the schedule to indian electricity act, 1910, since, the petitioner was a licensee and in terms of the clause 9(iv) of the schedule, a minimum of 12 months notice in writing was required to be given by the respondent for terminating the license. ..... the gujarat electricity industry (reorganisation and regulation) act, 2003 (gujarat act no. .....

Mohd. Yaqub Vs. the Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : AIR1971Delhi45a

..... malhotra, on behalf of the petitioner, has referred to part vi of the punjab reorganisation act which contains sections 47 to 66 and deals with the apportionment of assets and liabilities of the existing state of punjab. ..... ' successor state, to which there is a reference in sections 82 and 67, has been defined in section 2(m) of the punjab reorganisation act as meaning the state of punjab or haryana and includes the union territory of chandigarh and the transferred territory ..... has further been taken that the employment of the employees of the electricity board constituted the liability of the electricity board and the same was liable to be apportioned between the successor states under sub-sections (3) and (4) of section 67 of the punjab reorganisation act. ..... the petitioner has challenged the validity of-(a) the allocation of respondents 4 to 6 to the department of multipurpose projects and power, himachal pradesh; (b) the order of the central government equating the post of the assistant of the composite punjab state electricity board with the post of the assistant in the office of the chief engineer, department of multipurpose projects and power, himachal pradesh; and (c) the promotion of respondents 4 to 6 as circle superintendents in the department of multipurpose projects and power, himachal ..... the liabilities referred to in that part are of public debts, refund of taxes collected in excess, deposits, provident fund, pensions and those arising out of contracts and actionable wrongs .....