Court : Delhi
A$~40. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on: Judgment delivered on: % + 21.05.2013 15.07.2013 W.P.(C.) No. 883/2010 (Arising out of award dated 24.10.2009 in ID No.06/2005) RAMJAS FOUNDATION Through: .... Petitioner Mr. Sudhendhu P Gautam, Advocate. versus DHEER SINGH Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Sanjoy Ghose, Advocate. W.P.(C) 6499/2010 (Arising out of award dated 21.05.2010 in ID No.1292/2004) RAMJAS FOUNDATION Through: .... Petitioner Mr. Sudhendhu P Gautam, Advocate. versus SATYA PRAKASH SHARMA ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjoy Ghose, Advocate. W.P.(C) 6501/2010 (Arising out of award dated 21.05.2010 in ID No.10/2005) RAMJAS FOUNDATION Through: .... Petitioner Mr. Sudhendhu P Gautam, Advocate. versus SUNITA SHARMA Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Sanjoy Ghose, Advocate. W.P.(C) 6514/2010 (Arising out of award dated 21.05.2010 in ID No.1293/2004) RAMJAS FOUNDATION Through: .... Petitioner Mr. Sudhendhu P Gautam, Advocate. versus NARAYAN JHA Through: ..... ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
A$~40. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on: Judgment delivered on: % + 21.05.2013 15.07.2013 W.P.(C.) No. 883/2010 (Arising out of award dated 24.10.2009 in ID No.06/2005) RAMJAS FOUNDATION Through: .... Petitioner Mr. Sudhendhu P Gautam, Advocate. versus DHEER SINGH Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Sanjoy Ghose, Advocate. W.P.(C) 6499/2010 (Arising out of award dated 21.05.2010 in ID No.1292/2004) RAMJAS FOUNDATION Through: .... Petitioner Mr. Sudhendhu P Gautam, Advocate. versus SATYA PRAKASH SHARMA ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjoy Ghose, Advocate. W.P.(C) 6501/2010 (Arising out of award dated 21.05.2010 in ID No.10/2005) RAMJAS FOUNDATION Through: .... Petitioner Mr. Sudhendhu P Gautam, Advocate. versus SUNITA SHARMA Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Sanjoy Ghose, Advocate. W.P.(C) 6514/2010 (Arising out of award dated 21.05.2010 in ID No.1293/2004) RAMJAS FOUNDATION Through: .... Petitioner Mr. Sudhendhu P Gautam, Advocate. versus NARAYAN JHA Through: ..... ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
A$~40. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on: Judgment delivered on: % + 21.05.2013 15.07.2013 W.P.(C.) No. 883/2010 (Arising out of award dated 24.10.2009 in ID No.06/2005) RAMJAS FOUNDATION Through: .... Petitioner Mr. Sudhendhu P Gautam, Advocate. versus DHEER SINGH Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Sanjoy Ghose, Advocate. W.P.(C) 6499/2010 (Arising out of award dated 21.05.2010 in ID No.1292/2004) RAMJAS FOUNDATION Through: .... Petitioner Mr. Sudhendhu P Gautam, Advocate. versus SATYA PRAKASH SHARMA ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjoy Ghose, Advocate. W.P.(C) 6501/2010 (Arising out of award dated 21.05.2010 in ID No.10/2005) RAMJAS FOUNDATION Through: .... Petitioner Mr. Sudhendhu P Gautam, Advocate. versus SUNITA SHARMA Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Sanjoy Ghose, Advocate. W.P.(C) 6514/2010 (Arising out of award dated 21.05.2010 in ID No.1293/2004) RAMJAS FOUNDATION Through: .... Petitioner Mr. Sudhendhu P Gautam, Advocate. versus NARAYAN JHA Through: ..... ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
A$~40. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on: Judgment delivered on: % + 21.05.2013 15.07.2013 W.P.(C.) No. 883/2010 (Arising out of award dated 24.10.2009 in ID No.06/2005) RAMJAS FOUNDATION Through: .... Petitioner Mr. Sudhendhu P Gautam, Advocate. versus DHEER SINGH Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Sanjoy Ghose, Advocate. W.P.(C) 6499/2010 (Arising out of award dated 21.05.2010 in ID No.1292/2004) RAMJAS FOUNDATION Through: .... Petitioner Mr. Sudhendhu P Gautam, Advocate. versus SATYA PRAKASH SHARMA ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjoy Ghose, Advocate. W.P.(C) 6501/2010 (Arising out of award dated 21.05.2010 in ID No.10/2005) RAMJAS FOUNDATION Through: .... Petitioner Mr. Sudhendhu P Gautam, Advocate. versus SUNITA SHARMA Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Sanjoy Ghose, Advocate. W.P.(C) 6514/2010 (Arising out of award dated 21.05.2010 in ID No.1293/2004) RAMJAS FOUNDATION Through: .... Petitioner Mr. Sudhendhu P Gautam, Advocate. versus NARAYAN JHA Through: ..... ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on: % + 15.05.2013 Judgment delivered on:22. 07.2013 W.P.(C) 7729/1999 M/S WHIRLPOOL OF INDIA LTD Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Neeraj Kishan Kaul, Sr. Advocate with Mr. A.S.Chadha, Advocate & Ms. Meera Mathur, Advocate versus REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER..... Respondent Through: Mr. R.C.Chawla, Advocate CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI JUDGMENT VIPIN SANGHI, J.1. The petitioner has preferred the present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to assail the order dated 28.07.1999 passed by the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner (RPFC) under section 7A of the Employees Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 (the Act), and the appellate order dated 17.12.1999 passed by the Employees Provident Fund Appellate Tribunal (the Tribunal) dismissing the petitioners appeal under section 7I of the Act against the order dated 28.07.1999.2. The petitioner runs its factory at Faridabad. In ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) No. 3256/2010, W.P.(C) 4891/2008, W.P.(C) 865/2010 23rd August, 2013 % + WP(C) 3256/2010 & CM Nos. 6507/10, 6777/10 & 7431/10 (i.5) FCI HANDLING WORKERS UNION Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Sanjiv Bahl, Mr. Chandan Kumar and Mr. Eklavya, Advocates. Versus UOI & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Om Prakash Adv. for R-2 & 3. Mr. Arvind Nayar and Mr. Vikas Kumar, and Mr. Zartab Anwar, Advs. for R-4. + W.P.(C) 4891/2008 & CM No. 9394/2008 (Stay) (i.3) SHREE NATH SINGH & ORS Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Arvind Nayar and Mr. Vikash Kumar and Mr. Zartab Anwar, Advocates. versus FOOD CORPORATOIN OF INDIA & ORS Through: WPC Nos. 3256/2010, 4891/2008, 865/2010 ..... Respondents + W.P.(C) 865/2010 & CM Nos.1822/2010 & 5309/2010 (i.4) BABU RAM NAYAK & OTHERS Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. Arvind Nayar and Mr. Vikash Kumar and Mr. Zartab Anwar, Advocates. Versus FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN-CUMMANAGING DIRECTOR & ORS. ..... Res...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) No. 3256/2010, W.P.(C) 4891/2008, W.P.(C) 865/2010 23rd August, 2013 % + WP(C) 3256/2010 & CM Nos. 6507/10, 6777/10 & 7431/10 (i.5) FCI HANDLING WORKERS UNION Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Sanjiv Bahl, Mr. Chandan Kumar and Mr. Eklavya, Advocates. Versus UOI & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Om Prakash Adv. for R-2 & 3. Mr. Arvind Nayar and Mr. Vikas Kumar, and Mr. Zartab Anwar, Advs. for R-4. + W.P.(C) 4891/2008 & CM No. 9394/2008 (Stay) (i.3) SHREE NATH SINGH & ORS Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Arvind Nayar and Mr. Vikash Kumar and Mr. Zartab Anwar, Advocates. versus FOOD CORPORATOIN OF INDIA & ORS Through: WPC Nos. 3256/2010, 4891/2008, 865/2010 ..... Respondents + W.P.(C) 865/2010 & CM Nos.1822/2010 & 5309/2010 (i.4) BABU RAM NAYAK & OTHERS Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. Arvind Nayar and Mr. Vikash Kumar and Mr. Zartab Anwar, Advocates. Versus FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN-CUMMANAGING DIRECTOR & ORS. ..... Res...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) No. 3256/2010, W.P.(C) 4891/2008, W.P.(C) 865/2010 23rd August, 2013 % + WP(C) 3256/2010 & CM Nos. 6507/10, 6777/10 & 7431/10 (i.5) FCI HANDLING WORKERS UNION Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Sanjiv Bahl, Mr. Chandan Kumar and Mr. Eklavya, Advocates. Versus UOI & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Om Prakash Adv. for R-2 & 3. Mr. Arvind Nayar and Mr. Vikas Kumar, and Mr. Zartab Anwar, Advs. for R-4. + W.P.(C) 4891/2008 & CM No. 9394/2008 (Stay) (i.3) SHREE NATH SINGH & ORS Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Arvind Nayar and Mr. Vikash Kumar and Mr. Zartab Anwar, Advocates. versus FOOD CORPORATOIN OF INDIA & ORS Through: WPC Nos. 3256/2010, 4891/2008, 865/2010 ..... Respondents + W.P.(C) 865/2010 & CM Nos.1822/2010 & 5309/2010 (i.4) BABU RAM NAYAK & OTHERS Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. Arvind Nayar and Mr. Vikash Kumar and Mr. Zartab Anwar, Advocates. Versus FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN-CUMMANAGING DIRECTOR & ORS. ..... Res...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:9. h October, 2013 % + WP (C) No.4770/2012 & CM Nos. 9869/2012 (for stay), 11129/2012 (for impleadment), 16545/2012 (for intervention/impleadment), 16845/2012 (for intervention/ impleadment), 16882/2012 (for intervention/ impleadment) DELHI HIGH COURT BAR ASSOCIATION & ANR. ......Petitioners Through: Mr.A.S. Chandhiok, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Mohit Gupta, Mr.Amit Saxena, Ms. Laxmi Chauhan, Advs. Mr.J.P. Sengh, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Mohit Mathur, P-2 in WP (C) No.4770/2012 in person and Ms. Sandhya Gupta & Mr.Ritesh Singh, Advs. Mr. Amit Khemka, Adv. with Ms. Sanorita D. Bharali, Mr. Rishi Sehgal, Advs. for New Delhi Bar Association, Rohini Bar Association & Dwarka Bar Association for applicants in CM Nos.16545/2012, 16845/2012 & 16882/2012. versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. ......Respondents Through : Mr. Harish N. Salve, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Nakul Dewan, Mr. J.M. Kalia, Mr. Raghav Shankar & Ms.Bhawna Garg, Advs. for Govt. of NCT of Delh...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:9. h October, 2013 % + WP (C) No.4770/2012 & CM Nos. 9869/2012 (for stay), 11129/2012 (for impleadment), 16545/2012 (for intervention/impleadment), 16845/2012 (for intervention/ impleadment), 16882/2012 (for intervention/ impleadment) DELHI HIGH COURT BAR ASSOCIATION & ANR. ......Petitioners Through: Mr.A.S. Chandhiok, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Shyam Sharma, Mr.Mohit Gupta, Mr.Amit Saxena, Ms. Laxmi Chauhan, Advs. Mr.J.P. Sengh, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Mohit Mathur, P-2 in WP (C) No.4770/2012 in person and Ms. Sandhya Gupta & Mr.Ritesh Singh, Advs. Mr. Amit Khemka, Adv. with Ms. Sanorita D. Bharali, Mr. Rishi Sehgal, Advs. for New Delhi Bar Association, Rohini Bar Association & Dwarka Bar Association for applicants in CM Nos.16545/2012, 16845/2012 & 16882/2012. versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. ......Respondents Through : Mr. Harish N. Salve, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Nakul Dewan, Mr. J.M. Kalia, Mr. Raghav Shankar & Ms.Bhawna Garg, Advs. for Gov...
Tag this Judgment!