M - Judgment Search Results

M S vs.m

Court: Delhi

themselves. The Apex Court further interpreted the phrase unable to maintain herself. The relevant para 6 reads as under: 6. The

M vs.m S

Court: Delhi

the company of the petitioner. The efforts were made in March 2011 when the grandfather of the petitioner was seriously ill.

M. Vs. G. Baluswamy Iyer V. Commissioner of Income-tax, Madras.

Court: Chennai

Reported in: AIR1956Mad47; [1955]28ITR235(Mad)

the assessee did was this. He credited himself with the moneys received from the Government and claimed the difference between Rs.

M. Vs. Kibe V. Commissioner of Wealth-tax.

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Reported in: (1987)63CTR(MP)156; [1987]168ITR82(MP); [1987]34TAXMAN364(MP)

Officer and remanded the matter to the Wealth-tax officer for making a fresh assessment. The Wealth-tax officer was also directed to

M. Vs. S. Kathirvelu Nadar V. Commissioner of Agricultural Income-tax ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: [1968]68ITR786(Mad)

purpose. There is no question of res judicata in the matter. In our opinion, none of the reasons given by the

M vs.A

Court: Delhi

any unnecessary adjournments to the parties. MAY06 2019 ds J.R. MIDHA, J.C.R.P. 101/2016 Page 4 of 4

M vs.p.b.

Court: Delhi

her matrimonial home at A-9, Neeti Bagh, Delhi and the marriage was consummated between the parties at the said address on

M. Vs. Shanmugavel Nadar and Sons V. Commissioner of Income-tax, Madra ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: [1948]16ITR355(Mad)

Pachayappa Nadar and another was the Hindu undivided family of M. V. Shanmugavel Nadar Sons. This family consisted of 7 male

M. Vs.v.s.

Court: Delhi

Karungi Ki Tum Soch Bhi Nahn paoge aur tumhe jhuthe mukadme main fasa dungi aur teri chhati par saap ban kar

M vs.A

Court: Delhi

and Mr. Vivek Kapur, Advocates ..... Appellant A versus Through: Mr. I.V. Raghav, Advocate along with ..... Respondent respondent in person.