Loading - Year 2002 - Judgments

Mar 07 2002 (HC)

Hindusthan Paper Corporation Ltd. Vs. Wellbrines Chemicals Private Ltd ...

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Mar-07-2002

Reported in: (2002)3CALLT114(HC)

..... petitioner s telex dated 31 st october 1991 did not affect the postponement of the loading date nevertheless the oral agreement entered between the petitioner and the representative of the respondent ..... obligation upon the charterer to ensure that the cargo is available at the loading port so that the loading can commerce immediately admittedly in the instant case the loi stipulates the expected .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 13 2002 (HC)

Elecon Engineering Co. Ltd. and anr. Vs. Gujarat Mineral Development C ...

Court: Gujarat

Decided on: Sep-13-2002

Reported in: (2003)2GLR956

..... tender evaluation criteria incorporated in clause ii 17 0 ignoring the loading that was required to be done on account of such commercial ..... and it could not be made responsive by any process of loading of the price quoted by the petitioners and that irrespective of ..... since no such conditions remained there could arise no question of loading the revised price bid of the respondent no 2 which was .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 15 2002 (HC)

Goyal Food Industries Vs. Municipal Corporation of Delhi

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jan-15-2002

Reported in: 2002VAD(Delhi)134; AIR2002Delhi371; 97(2002)DLT144; 2002(62)DRJ375

..... connectionno 129393 is in the name of the plaintiff thesanctioned load with respect to the connection in the name of sh ..... toconsume 200 units per kws per month without paying any load violation surcharge it is alleged that unless a consumer consumed ..... shows that the consumption pattern is relevant to determine the connected load the defendants have held the plaintiffs guilty without conducting the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 27 2002 (TRI)

Madurai Soft Drinks Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Cce

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Decided on: Sep-27-2002

Reported in: (2003)(86)ECC269

..... the expenses connected with promotion of marketability of the goods the loading charges upto the factory gate the cost of transportation of ..... ltd m s madurai soft drinks subsequently claimed that the loading charges inside the factory were borne by them and included ..... to the assessable value on the ground that the same represented loading charges upto the factory gate the cost of transportation of .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 02 2002 (HC)

Regl. Director, E.S.i. Corpn. Vs. the Aluminium Industries Ltd.

Court: Kerala

Decided on: Aug-02-2002

Reported in: [2003(96)FLR512]; (2003)ILLJ84Ker

..... their own regular employees and occasionally they were engaging casual employees from outside therefore whatever loading and unloading charges paid must be either to this regular employees or to outsiders who ..... appellant following the decision of the supreme court and the high court wages paid towards loading and unloading will be wages within the meaning of the act attracting contribution canteen .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 08 2002 (HC)

Federation Chamber of Industries and anr. Vs. State of Jammu and Kashm ...

Court: Jammu and Kashmir

Decided on: Oct-08-2002

Reported in: AIR2004J& K74,2003(1)JKJ114

..... amount for non supply of electricity due to disruption by tripping load sheddings power cuts etc but the consumer instead of making such ..... tariff in the state when small scale industrial units with connected load upto 20 hp were asked to pay 59 paise per unit ..... the said government order all industrial consumers with a connected agreemental load upto and including 5 k w were asked to apply only .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 05 2002 (HC)

A.P.S.E.B. and ors. Vs. Warangal Municipal Corporation, Warangal

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Feb-05-2002

Reported in: AIR2002AP210

..... exceeding 75 hp of 56 kw and the total contracted load connected load not exceeding 125 hp 93 kw with contracted demand not ..... for the water works carried on by them with contracted connected load above 75hp 56 kw according to these corporations the electricity ..... provided that board may supply power at lt industrial non jndustrial loads not exceeding 150 hp subject to specific conditions prescribed by .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 26 2002 (TRI)

Commissioner of Central Excise, Vs. Telco Ltd.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Feb-26-2002

Reported in: (2002)(84)ECC54

..... the appellants had classified tata mobile 207 model crew cab with load body as goods transport vehicle under heading 8704 they were ..... vehicle is principally designed for the transport of persons irrespective of load carrying capacity and would be classifiable under headings 8702 and ..... bench behind the front seats behind the bench is a loading space which is separated from the passenger area by a .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 31 2002 (TRI)

Sk. AzharuddIn Vs. Commissioner of Customs (Prev.),

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Calcutta

Decided on: Jan-31-2002

Reported in: (2002)(143)ELT119Tri(Kol.)kata

..... he failed to produce any bill or document pertaining to the said loaded ball bearings on examination the ball bearings were found to be ..... authority has merely gone by the fact that since the driver loaded the goods the involvement of the owner cannot be ruled out ..... not expected to verify the genuineness or otherwise of the goods loaded in their truck ball bearing is an item which is freely .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 12 2002 (TRI)

Scooter India Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Dec-12-2002

Reported in: (2002)LC654Tri(Delhi)

..... co driver the appellant is manufacturing drive away chassis common for load carrier delivery van as well as auto rickshaw when body is ..... the commissioner for rejecting the contention of the assessee regarding the load carrying capacity is also not acceptable it is true that each ..... capacity of six persons excluding driver on the ground that its load capacity is 750 kgs 13 we hold that the assessee has .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Loading - Judgment Search Results