Legislation - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: legislation Year: 1982 Page 1 of about 300 results (0.028 seconds)Northern Pipeline Vs. Marathon Pipe Line
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-28-1982
..... and constitutionally so exceptional that the congressional assertion of a power to create legislative courts was consistent with rather than threatening to the constitutional mandate of separation ..... argument is that even where the constitution denies congress the power to establish legislative courts congress possesses the authority to assign certain factfinding functions to adjunct tribunals .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMerrill Lynch Vs. Curran
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: May-03-1982
..... fraudulent and deceptive conduct and of the provisions designed to prevent price manipulation the legislative history clearly indicates that congress intended to protect all futures traders from price ..... that regulatory scheme the elimination of a significant enforcement tool would clash with this legislative pattern we therefore may not simply assume that congress silently withdrew the preexisting .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTFerc Vs. Mississippi
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-01-1982
..... conscript ing state utility commissions into the national bureaucratic army of transforming state legislative bodies into field offices of the national bureaucracy of approving the dismemberment of ..... directly affecting individuals and rejecting proposals that would have given congress military or legislative power over state governments in this way the framers established independent state and .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTWashington Vs. Seattle Sch. Dist. No. 1
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-30-1982
..... championing school integration to surmount a considerably higher hurdle than persons seeking comparable legislative action as in hunter then the community s political mechanisms are modified to ..... political process or the decisionmaking mechanism used to address racially conscious legislation and only such legislation is singled out for peculiar and disadvantageous treatment the governmental action .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTClements Vs. Fashing
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-25-1982
..... those serving the electorate of another state from the corrupting influence of a state legislative campaign the only conceivable state interest in barring these candidacies would be the purely ..... impermissible one of protecting texas legislative seats against outside competition but the plurality does not address this question or purport .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCrawford Vs. Los Angeles Board of Educ.
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-30-1982
..... unconstitutional under the fourteenth amendment not because it repealed two pieces of antidiscrimination legislation but because the proposition involved the state in private racial discrimination here ..... unenforceable the political process or the decisionmaking mechanism used to address racially conscious legislation has not been singled out for peculiar and disadvantageous treatment washington v .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBoard of Educ. Vs. Rowley
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-28-1982
..... footnote 23 this view is supported by the congressional intention frequently expressed in the legislative history that handicapped children be enabled to achieve a reasonable degree of self ..... inadequate protection and an overly demanding requirement we thus view these references in the legislative history as evidence of congress intention that the services provided handicapped children be .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNorth Haven Bd. of Educ. Vs. Bell
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: May-17-1982
..... under any education program or activity receiving federal financial assistance title ix s legislative history corroborates its general program specificity congress failed to adopt proposals that would ..... regulating discrimination in employment practices these agencies have the expertise and their enabling legislation page 456 u s 554 has provided them with the investigative and enforcement .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMcelroy Vs. United States
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Mar-23-1982
..... bill were careful to justify its constitutionality nothing in the statutory language or the legislative history indicates that congress used the constitutionally significant term interstate commerce in the bill ..... rec 470 1919 it is inconceivable that representative dyer or any of the other legislators who used interchangeably the various phrases footnote 2 6 nevertheless intended the statutory .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommunity Communications Vs. City of Boulder
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jan-13-1982
..... simply does not and cannot further the interests that lie behind most social welfare legislation although state or local enactments are not invalidated by the sherman act merely because ..... are not implicated when federal law is applied to invalidate otherwise constitutionally valid municipal legislation i find this reasoning remarkable indeed our notions of federalism are implicated when it .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial