Learned - Year 2000 - Judgments

Sep 22 2000 (HC)

Bata India Limited Vs. the Learned Commissioner, Workmen's Compensatio ...

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Sep-22-2000

Reported in: II(2001)ACC4,2001ACJ1074,(2001)1CALLT268(HC),[2001(89)FLR525],(2001)ILLJ670Cal

..... not be applied to the case of the claimants in these two cases and the learned court below was clearly wrong in computing the assessment in each case on the basis ..... workmen s compensation act 1923 13 we accordingly allow both the appeals and direct the learned court below to re assess the compensation on the basis of the provisions of section .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 23 2000 (TRI)

Baijanath Plastic Products Vs. Cce

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Nov-23-2000

Reported in: (2001)(95)LC505Tri(Mum.)bai

..... a process of manufacture but at the same time we find substantial force in the learned advocate s plea for the respondents that there is no other way of removing the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 01 2000 (TRI)

Millipore India (P) Ltd. Vs. Cce

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Decided on: Dec-01-2000

Reported in: (2001)(95)LC241Tri(Bang.)alore

..... purposes under rule 9b of ce rules 1944 in this view of the matter the learned consultant submits that present confirmation of classification is bad in law he also led us .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 01 2000 (TRI)

Tarantaran Co-op. Sugar Mills Vs. Commr. of C. Ex.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Dec-01-2000

Reported in: (2001)(73)ECC618

..... 300 per quintal and the sugar factories are liable to pay the differential duty 2 learned departmental representative has not placed before us any document evidencing any contract for the sale .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 24 2000 (TRI)

Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. Hindustan Radiators

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Nov-24-2000

Reported in: (2001)(127)ELT284TriDel

..... notification cannot be allowed for non observance of chapter x procedure 2 on hearing the learned dr and noting that the issue in the appeal relates to eligibility to the benefit .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 24 2000 (TRI)

Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. National Dyes

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Nov-24-2000

Reported in: (2001)(74)ECC271

..... elt 759 hence this application for reference 3 we have heard dr d k verma learned dr and perused the written submissions of the respondents at the outset we note that .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 24 2000 (TRI)

intercare Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Nov-24-2000

Reported in: (2001)(128)ELT203TriDel

..... while imported goods were in freeze dried form 2 we have heard ms reena khair learned counsel and dr d k verma sdr the bill of entry describes the goods as .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 23 2000 (TRI)

Gauri Shankar Singh Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Nov-23-2000

Reported in: (2001)(127)ELT286TriDel

..... and direct the department to release the goods to the appellant at this stage the learned advocate submits that the appellant had pre deposited the penalty amount for hearing the appeal .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 23 2000 (TRI)

intertec Vs. Cce

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Nov-23-2000

Reported in: (2001)(74)ECC155

..... with the view taken by the tribunal in kamrup industrial gases case one of us learned brother shri pg chacko was one of the member of the bench the arguments advanced .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 06 2000 (TRI)

The Niranjan Mills Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Dec-06-2000

Reported in: (2001)(74)ECC489

..... it is not legal and proper and requires to be set aside sri arun chopra learned sdr for the respondent has contended that the impugned order is passed in terms of .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Learned - Judgment Search Results