Knowing - Judgment Search Results

Kansas Vs. Ventris

Court: US Supreme Court

kansas v ventris 07 1356 2009 syllabus october term 2008 kansas v ventris supreme court of the united states kansas...

Flores-figueroa Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

..... possessing or using something and the government reluctantly concedes that the offender likely must know that he is transferring possessing or using that something without lawful authority but they ..... choices brief for united states 14 emphasis added step three requiring the offender to know that the means of identification belongs to another person would consequently be superfluous in this .....

Sanjeev Nanda Vs. the State

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 160(2009)DLT775

..... in the dictionary is something which proceeds from a conscious motion of the will voluntary knowingly deliberate intending the result which actually comes to pass designed purposeful not accidental or ..... 201 causing disappearance of evidence of offence or giving false information to screen offenderwhoever knowing or having reason to believe that an offence has been committed causes any evidence .....

Dammalapati Subba Rao Vs. Bobbili Peda Nanchara Prasad (Died) Per L.Rs ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2009(6)ALT634

..... defendants agreed to get the plaint schedule land measured and to know the actual extent of the land after measurement in favour of ..... defendant was afraid that his father and others will come to know of these dealings and gradually succumbed to the said appa rao ..... pertinent to note that this witness deposed that he dies not know gudivada reddemma s o ramaiah and goppallapudi panduranga rao and he .....

Lukba Rime and Etc. Vs. State of Arunachal Pradesh

Court: Guwahati

Reported in: 2009CriLJ3100

..... the occurrence has been explained as stated therein they did not know their names and address of the accused persons they have maintained ..... rickshaw of the accused for some hours had they not been knowing at least some of the accused persons these girls although stated ..... during the time of occurrence it was important and vital to know about the same to ascertain the truthfulness of the statement .....

Montejo Vs. Louisiana

Court: US Supreme Court

..... makes clear that the sixth amendment is violated when the state obtains incriminating statements by knowingly circumventing the accused s right to have counsel present in a confrontation between the ..... observed in patterson the conclusion that miranda warnings ordinarily provide a sufficient basis for a knowing waiver of the right to counsel rests on the questionable assumption that those warnings .....

M.A. Krishnaiah S/O Annappa, Retired Teacher Vs. State of Karnataka by ...

Court: Karnataka

..... that he was not attending the school properly he does not know as to whether mariyappa and his son did give application to ..... learned public prosecutor that he has read the panchanama and after knowing its contents he has signed the same and after feeling that ..... complainant informed about the truth of the incident they came to know that the appellant accused had poured acid on the complainant and .....

University of Calcutta and ors. Vs. Pritam Rooj

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: AIR2009Cal97

..... would generously give limited information to the examinees by letting them know the particulars of marks obtained by them in respect of each ..... about the functioning of the government it is only if people know how government is functioning that they can fulfil the role ..... the specious ground that the examinee having answered the questions he knows better than anyone else what has been written on the .....

Moore Stephens (a Firm) (Respondents) Vs. Stone Rolls Limited (In Liqu ...

Court: House of Lords

..... the entire shareholder body and the entire management is embodied in a single individual who knows everything because he has done everything 72 those submissions were largely founded on the decision ..... covered by a fidelity policy subject to a proviso excluding from indemnity 8220 any person knowingly committing making or condoning a dishonest or fraudulent act 8221 this context had an important .....

Secretary of State for the Home Department (Respondent) Vs. Af (Appell ...

Court: House of Lords

..... what difference might disclosure have made is that you can never know 8221 37 in a postscript to their judgment the majority explained ..... to refute them if such information existed without his having to know the detail or sources of the evidence which formed the basis ..... be damaging to the doctor patient relationship they would want to know precisely what it was in this doctor 8217 s evidence that .....