Knowing - Judgment Search Results

Simon Carves India Ltd. Vs. Central Board of Direct Taxes and Another.

Court: Delhi

Reported in: (1979)14CTR(Del)47; [1979]120ITR172(Delhi)

..... qualify for approval unless the supplier is also required under the agreement to provide technical know how the board has to consider thereforee whether the contract drawings required to be ..... supplied by the contractor constitute technical know how we thereforee allow the writ petition quash the impugned order and direct the board .....

Hindusthan Commercial Bank Ltd. Vs. Probodh Kumar Mitter and anr.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: AIR1980Cal292

..... when the witness was the agent of that branch he came to know of the missing shares when certain enquiry came from certain companies ..... he never saw ramkinkar ghosh taking out the securities nor could he know anybody of the bank seeing him to take them away the ..... statutory duty for the benefit of the bank did the plaintiff ever know which bank would present the shares for delivery was there any .....

Sandstrom Vs. Montana

Court: US Supreme Court

..... ordinary consequences of his voluntary acts and not to disprove that he acted purposely or knowingly the montana court held that the instruction did not violate due process standards held because ..... 101 criminal homicide 1 a person commits the offense of criminal homicide if he purposely knowingly or negligently causes the death of another human being 2 criminal homicide is deliberate homicide .....

Herber Vs. Lando

Court: US Supreme Court

..... editorial decisionmaking if the claimed inhibition flows from the fear of damages liability for publishing knowing or reckless falsehoods those effects are precisely those that have been held to be ..... new york times removed first amendment protection from defamatory falsehood published with actual malice in knowing or reckless disregard of the truth footnote 3 12 subsequent decisions have made clear .....

Shyam Sundar Bhartia and ors. Vs. Gourishankar Bhartia and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: AIR1980Cal230

..... the document and did not have independent advice she did not know either the defendant company nor the firm of omkarmal bhartia nor ..... understood the contents thereof the evidence was that she did not know english and it was incumbent that the contents of the conveyance ..... never heard of the defendant company or that she did not know the firm of omkarmal bhartia are patently incorrect and improbable when .....

Fare Vs. Michael C.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... is taken a heavy burden rests on the government to demonstrate that the defendant knowingly and intelligently waived his privilege against self incrimination and his right to retained or appointed ..... trickery or deceit on these facts we think it clear that respondent voluntarily and knowingly waived his fifth amendment rights respondent argues however that any statements he made during interrogation .....

Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Co., Inc. Vs. Ftc

Court: US Supreme Court

..... or prevent competition with any person who either grants or knowingly receives the benefit of such discrimination or with customers of ..... the distinction between a lying buyer and a buyer who knowingly accepts the lower of two bids as without legal significance ..... f by stating this paragraph makes the buyer liable for knowingly inducing or receiving any discrimination in price which is unlawful .....

Indian Telephone Industries Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, Karna ...

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: ILR1979KAR1547; [1979]117ITR682(KAR); [1979]117ITR682(Karn)

..... and to cause btm to provide the required technical information and know how and to sell certain machinery to the assessee which ..... in question which had been paid for acquiring the necessary technical know how pursuant to the agreements referred to above constituted revenue ..... was entered into with a foreign company for acquiring technical know how on the december 17 1947 under the relevant terms .....

Bachan Singh S/O Saudagar Singh Vs. State of Punjab

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: (1982)3SCC24; 19831SCR145;

..... crime is especially heinous atrocious or cruel or if the defendant knowingly created a great risk of death to many persons 206 agreeing with ..... be sustained there is no way of accurately predicting or knowing with any degree of moral certainty that a murderer will not be ..... many other examples clearly show that it is not possible to know before hand with any degree of certainty that a murderer is beyond .....

United States Vs. Kubrick

Court: US Supreme Court

..... his injury or at a later time when he also knows that the acts inflicting the injury may constitute medical malpractice i respondent ..... accrue until he knew or could reasonably be expected to know that in the eyes of the law the neomycin treatment constituted medical ..... in dictum that a malpractice plaintiff under the federal act must know the legal implications of the facts as well as the facts themselves .....