Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: karnataka urban development authorities act 1987 chapter 4 acquisition of land Page 1 of about 4,462 results (0.231 seconds)

Smt. M.V. Lalithamani and ors. Vs. Mysore Urban Development Authority, ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2003KAR1695; 2003(4)KarLJ528

..... items of agricultural lands are owned by the writ petitioners. these properties, among several other properties belonging to various other persons, were notified for acquisition under section 17 of the karnataka urban development authorities act, 1987 ('act' for short) by a gazette notification dated 30.1.1992 and by a final notification issued under section 19(1) dated 9.3.1998 for purposes of ..... order to appreciate the rival contentions, first it is necessary to refer to the relevant provisions of the urban development authority act in relation to the statutory requirements for acquisition of property.13. the karnataka urban development authorities act, 1987 was enacted with the purpose of developing major and important urban areas in the state. the state government has been empowered under section 3 of the act to constitute .....

Parvati And Ors Vs. The Assistant Commissioner And Ors

Court : Karnataka Kalaburagi

..... 8 of rules 1991 cannot be countenanced, more particularly when the substantive provisions of law, either under the land acquisition act, 1894 or under the karnataka urban development authority act, 1987, do not provide for such a settlement to be arrived at after passing of the general award.20. the other aspect of the ..... 18 of la act. the matter was accordingly referred. as such there is no other provision either under the land acquisition act, 1894 or the karnataka urban development authority act, 1987 providing for reconsideration, settlement, agreement or compromise in matter of acquisition or compensation after passing of the general award. therefore, the very ..... under section 18 of la act which has been rightly dismissed by the reference court warranting no interference. b. he refers to rule 8 of the karnataka urban development authorities (incentive scheme for voluntary surrender of land) rules, 1991 (herein after 'rules 1991') and submits that in terms of the provisions of the said .....

Smt. Sharfunnissa Vs. the Deputy Commissioner and anr.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2004KAR5062

..... 15 years of non-alienation period has not been completed for sale of lands. the issuance of preliminary notification by the state government under the provisions of karnataka urban development authority act of 1987 for acquisition of the lands in question is not in dispute. the fact that 15 years period of non-alienation incorporated in the occupancy certificate ..... the lands. there is no provision in the klrf act to relax the condition regarding non alienation of the lands either by the state government or any other authority.6. section 60 of the klrf act postulates as follows:'failure to cultivate personally -notwithstanding anything contained in any law, if at any time after the ..... limited and anr., 1986(1) klj 237 wherein the provision of section 95 of the karnataka land revenue act, 1964 (in short klr act) has been interpreted by this court and law has been laid down as under:'the authority to grant conversion cannot refuse the same if it is not covered by the prohibitions contained .....

Smt. Thimmavva Vs. the State of Karnataka Represented by Its Principal ...

Court : Karnataka

..... government having jurisdiction over the municipal area of tumkur stood dissolved and the karnataka improvement boards act, 1976 ceased to be applicable to tumkur area on the constitution of the tumkur urban development authority-5th respondent under the karnataka urban development authorities act, 1987, for short kuda act and in the light of section 78 ..... be no dispute and it cannot be disputed that on the constitution of the 5th respondent urban development authority for tunkur, section 78 of the kuda act states that the improvement board constituted under the karnataka improvement boards act, 1976 ceases to exist and the said act is inapplicable. the constitution ..... 76 of the kuda act, makes chapter 8 of the km act, inapplicable to the tmc, tumkur, on the constitution of the 5th respondent urban development authority, thus, denuding the tmc, tumkur from exercising a jurisdiction in the matter of preparing improvement schemes, to undertake works, incurs expenditure for improvement etc .....

Gopal S/O Mayappa Jadhav and Krishna S/O Mayappa Jadhav Vs. the State ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2006KAR135; 2007(1)KarLJ76; 2007(1)KCCR435; 2006(6)AIRKarR495

..... the learned counsels appearing on both sides and perused the material on record. the petitioners have sought for quashing the acquisition notifications issued under section 17 and 19 of the karnataka urban development authorities act 1987 (hereinafter referred to as 'kuda act' for short). since the common acquisition notifications are assailed and as the common questions of facts and law arise for consideration, these ..... . the petitioners' lands are acquired by the state by issuing impugned notifications for the benefit of belgaum urban development authority ('authority' in short) which is constituted under the provisions of the karnataka urban development authorities act 1987 ('kuda act' in short). by passing the resolution dated 09.06.2000, the 'authority' proposed to acquire lands to the extent of about 50 acres for formation of residential layout for its .....

Yallappa Vs. The Commissioner

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... that in response to the invitation to sell corner sites by public auction, though petitioners offers were highest, the respondent-belgaum urban 2 air1996sc11- 14 - nc:2024. khc-d:11376 wp no.107883 of 2016 development authority declined to accept the offers. this court, in the said writ petitions made an observation that the jurisdiction to decide the ..... scheme sanctioned under the act. no doubt, in the case on hand the question of any lease for any period does not arise but regulation no.5 of the karnataka housing board (allotment) regulations 1983 is regarding lapse to the lessee, which reads as under:5. allottees to be a lessee:- allottee of a site/houses notified ..... also contended that the petitioners cannot contend that they may be allotted the commercial and corner sites. the counsel also relied upon the chapter iv section 38 of the karnataka housing board act 1962 (for short, the khb act ) and brought to the notice of this court power to dispose of the land. the counsel rely on .....

The Karnataka Housing Board Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... their due meaning and cannot be ignored as a surplusage. thirdly, the judgment of jaipur development authority is under the provisions of jaipur development authority act, 1982 and rajasthan urban improvement act, 1959 and the object and scheme of the aforesaid acts are distinct as compared to the scheme of the karnataka act under consideration.39. in prathap vs. state of rajasthan [air1996sc1296, section 52 of ..... the rajasthan urban improvement act, 1959 was considered and it was held that even if there is .....

Haribhau Siddapa Patil and Others Vs. the State of Karnataka, Rep. by ...

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... fifth respondent. 10. mr. gokakakar, learned counsel for the appellants has urged that subject lands being within the area notified by belgaum urban development authority as the area for its development under the comprehensive development plan notified under the provisions of the karnataka town and country planning act, 1961, the issue of notification under section 3(1) of the act in respect of lands covered within ..... the limits of the belgaum urban development authority is bad in law. it is urged that even assuming for arguments, the karnataka industrial area development act, 1966 is a special enactment, vis- -vis, the industrial areas development act, nevertheless, the procedural compliance with section 14-a of the karnataka town and country planning act, 1961 is very necessary and that .....

Sri Govind Singh and 6 ors. Vs. the Principal Secretary to Government, ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2008(1)ALT593

..... of g.o.ms. no. 733 since this is not merely a case where the declarants were dispossessed, but the property was transferred initially in favour of hyderabad urban development authority and later to a.p. industrial infrastructure corporation, hyderabad for utilizing the same to set up integrated i.t park project. even assuming that there is any scope ..... and, therefore, the said area was taken into account for computation of holding of declarant. it is further stated that as per land use certificate issued by hyderabad urban development authority except two small bits in western side, rest of the area is specified for the purpose other than agriculture and as such the land in question is treated ..... in t.r. thandur v. union of india and ors. : air1996sc1643 to say that the decision of the supreme court in s. vasudeva v. state of karnataka (1993) 3 scc 467 that prohibited transfer of any part of the excess vacant land in respect of which exemption had been granted under section 20(1)(b) of .....

B.K. Annappa Vs. the Urban Development Authority, Hassan and Others

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1999KAR1147; 1998(6)KarLJ310

..... be initiated against him. it is under these circumstances, the present writ petition has been filed with prayer referred to in para 1 above.7. the authority has been constituted under section 3 of the karnataka urban development authorities act, 1987 (in short the 'act'). section 12 of the act provides that the government shall appoint an officer not below the rank of 'group a ..... party'.18. in the personal affidavit filed by the respondent-commissioner, it has been revealed that.-'i submit that there are no regulations framed by this authority and approved by the government under section 72 of karnataka urban development authorities act, 1987 governing day-to-day activities of the department. it is true on reading of the provisions under sections 51 and 52 of the .....