Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: karnataka urban development authorities act 1987 chapter 4 acquisition of land Page 4 of about 4,462 results (0.324 seconds)

M/s. M.s.p.l. Limited Rep. By Executive Director Mr. Medavenkataiah Vs ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... as members: the secretary, finance department; the secretary, housing and urban development; the commissioner, industrial development; director, industries and commerce; the chairman and managing director, karnataka state industrial investment and development corporation limited; the chairman, karnataka state pollution control board; the director, town planning; the managing director, karnataka state small industries development corporation limited; the managing director, karnataka state financial corporation; the executive member of the board; and two ..... making process on the parameters of the same being affected or vitiated due to unreasonableness, arbitrariness or irrationality, which concepts are not capable of a precise definition though many erudite authors have made good contributions and administrative law is very much part of jurisprudence but is on more substantial and precise parameters such as on the touchstone of the statutory provisions .....

The Printers (Mysore) Ltd. Vs. M.A. Rasheed and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : JT2004(4)SC158; (2004)3MLJ132(SC); 2004(4)SCALE192; (2004)4SCC460; 2004(2)LC1300(SC)

..... conditions and limitations, as may be prescribed. the state of karnataka has framed three rules under the act, namely, (i) bangalore development authority (allotment of sites) rules, 1982; (ii) bangalore development authority (allotment of buildings under self financing housing scheme) rules, 1982; and (iii) bangalore development authority (disposal of corner sites and commercial sites) rules, 1984.17 ..... . unless rules were framed as contemplated by the act, according to the high court the central government had no authority in law issue executive directions for the sale and disposal of urban agricultural property. this view was taken, placing reliance on an earlier decision of a division bench of that court ..... the rules that may be made and as no rules had been framed, the central government had no authority in law to issue administrative directions providing for the transfer of the urban agricultural land by auction sale. in our opinion the view taken by the high court is incorrect. where .....

Radhakrishnan R. Vs. Presiding Officer, Labour Court and anr.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (2004)IIILLJ631Mad

..... m. mahapurush , reserve bank of india and anr. v. cd. chauhan and ors. 1994 (1) l.l.n. 325, s. govindaraju v. karnataka state road transport corporation and anr. : (1986)iillj351sc , punjab land development and reclamation corporation ltd. v. labour court, chandigarh and ors. : (1990)iillj70sc , kalicharan rath v. orissa sangeet natak academy and anr. . learned ..... tall and who are still continuing in service. it was further submitted that even the management had admitted that this power of relaxation had vested with the authorities, but it had been withdrawn subsequently and no evidence was produced before the labour court to show the withdrawal of the power. for all these reasons, ..... h llj 492 to arrive at its conclusion, but this judgment had been disapproved of by the division bench of our court in president, srirangam co-operative urban bank ltd. v. labour court, madurai and k. nagarajan where the division bench had disagreed with the aforesaid judgment of the kerala high court on the .....

K. Kemparamaiah Vs. State of Karnataka and Others

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1999KAR1853; 1998(6)KarLJ422

..... him which is proposed to be acquired in connection with any development scheme of an authority, in relation to which a notification under the bangalore development authority act, 1976, or under section 17 of the karnataka urban development authorities act, 1987, or under section 15 of the karnataka improvement boards act, 1976, is published and which has ..... not yet vested in favour of any authority for which the acquisition is proposed, may, ..... land was proposed to be acquired. really it had already been acquired in 1978. so it continued to remain vested in the local authority i.e., the bangalore development authority.3. thus, considered in my opinion, the petitioner's contention placing reliance on section 3 is without merits. as far as .....

H. Rajaiah and Others Vs. State of Karnatka and Another

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2000KAR4989; 2000(6)KarLJ401

..... has been assailed on two distinct grounds. it was firstly argued by learned counsel for the petitioners that removal of a nominated member was under the karnataka urban development authorities act, 1987 permissible only in situations and on the grounds stipulated in section 6 of the said act. the doctrine of pleasure incorporated in section 5 ..... way whittles down the power to remove on pleasure. section 5 of the karnataka urban development authorities act, 1987 is in pari materia with section 5 of the karnataka improvement boards act, 1976 and specifically provides that appointments of chairman and members of the authority shall be subject to the pleasure of the government. it therefore envisages a ..... stated at the outset.2. petitioner in w.p. no. 39747 of 1999 was by an order of the state government appointed as chairman of the urban development authority, hubli whereas petitioners in w.p. nos. 43249 to 43252 of 1999, 41080 to 41083 of 1999 and 40480 to 40483 of 1999 were similarly nominated .....

N. Sampurnamma and Others Vs. State of Karnataka and Others

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 1998(6)KarLJ332

..... him; or (iii)belonging to him which is proposed to be acquired in connection with any development scheme of an authority, in relation to which a notification under the bangalore development authority act, 1976, or under section 17 of the karnataka urban development authorities act, 1987, or under section 15 of the karnataka improvement boards act,1976, is published and which has not yet vested in favour of any ..... authority for which the acquisition is proposed. may, on the application of such person made within 60 days of the commencement .....

Ms. Kalaivani A. and anr. Vs. State of Karnataka and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2002KAR1558; 2002(2)KarLJ499

..... the meetings such decisions shall not be implemented and the report shall be made in this regard to the government under the provisions of section 13(2)(a) of the karnataka urban development authority act. it is hereby informed that in case of default, the officer concerned will be made responsible and disciplinary action will be taken against him and the losses incurred by ..... was approved by the full board meeting consisting of the chief minister, minister-in-charge of urban development (vice-chairman), chairman, mayor of the corporation of the city of bangalore, chief secretary to the government of karnataka, secretary (finance) and other members. the board members of the authority ratified the appointment of the appellants. by this it cannot be said that the circular (annexure .....

Naganna (Deceased) by L.Rs and Others Vs. State of Karnataka and Other ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1998KAR3503; 1998(5)KarLJ658

..... of january, 1991 came to be issued in exercise of the power conferred on the development authority under sub-section (1) of section 17 of the karnataka urban development authorities act (hereinafter referred to as 'the authorities act'). the petitioners/their predecessors-in-title had filed objections for formation of scheme on ..... the lands in question. after consideration of the objections filed by them, the objections were overruled and the development authority, in all, ..... that the petitioners are entitled to succeed in these petitions.18. accordingly, the impugned notification dated 28th of january, 1991 issued by the urban development authority, raichur, and also the notification dated 30th of january, 1992 issued by the state government insofar as the lands of the petitioners are .....

C.B.C.i. Society for Medical Education and anr. Vs. Spl. Lao, Bda and ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1997KAR257

..... the purpose of the implementation of the scheme is required for a publicpurpose. similar provisions are also found in the karnataka improvement boards act, 1976 (for short 'the act of 1976') and the karnataka urban development authorities act, 1987 (for short 'act of 1987').10. section 17 of the bda act, takes the place of the notification under ..... the notifications issued under the bda act. in support of this contention he relied on a decision of this court in the case of krishnamurthy v. bangalore development authority, : ilr1996kar1258 wherein this court has held as follows:-'the next ground urged on behalf of the appellant that section 11a of the land acquisition act, is ..... measuring 11 acres 5 guntas in survey no. 80 of tavarekere village, begur hobli, bangalore south taluk. the said land was proposed for acquisition by the bangalore development authority ( hereinafter referred to as 'the act') in a notification dated 19.9.1977 issued under section 17(1) and (3) of the bda act. the .....

Smt. Manjula and ors. Vs. the Chief Minister, Government of Karnataka ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 2004(4)KarLJ495

..... and the allotment of land to respondent 28-institution. it is stated that the city of mysore improvement act, 1903 was repealed and superseded by the karnataka urban development authorities act, 1987 and the muda act on 1-1-1989. it is submitted that there is no power to invoke the provisions under the city of mysore ..... improvement act, 1903 and therefore the notification is bad in law and without jurisdiction. it is also stated that the urban development authority has given a power only to formulate a scheme and provide land to such persons and therefore the issuance of notification is without jurisdiction and the ..... herein was ordered to hand over the property granted to it under annexure-h notwithstanding improvements made upon the land in question within 60 days to mysore urban development authority ('muda' for short). the muda was further directed to take steps to evict the unauthorised occupants. the appellant prays to set aside the order dated 22 .....