Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: karnataka traffic control act 1960 section 7 signals Sorted by: old Court: himachal pradesh Page 4 of about 44 results (0.089 seconds)

State of Himachal Pradesh Vs. Amrik Singh

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : 2007CriLJ4177

..... notorious fact that the accidents of motor vehicles are rampant on the public highways due to the rash or negligent driving by the drivers, on account of flouting of the traffic rules and lack of road sense. this menace is required to be curbed without showing any leniency. if the stern action is not taken at the right time, it may ..... place and that the mechanic (pw 7) who had examined the vehicles involved in the accident did not deny that the car was in a speed and driver could not control his speed and hit the truck. pws. 2 and 3 aforesaid also did not spell out that the respondent was driving the truck rashly or negligently, so as to endanger ..... increase and the life of the public will always remain in peril. therefore, the benefit of probation of offenders act cannot be extended to the respondent, as it will be a misplaced sympathy. however, keeping in view the fact that the respondent has been facing the trial before the court .....

Munish Kumar Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : 2008ACJ2332,2007(3)ShimLC341

..... are that the bridge over garali khud known as 'garali khud bridge' was damaged on 7.8.1984. this bridge was thereafter closed to all vehicular and other traffic. on 18.9.1988 at about 5 p.m. the plaintiff munish kumar was travelling on his motor cycle no. pah 3340 from village badoh to garoh in ..... all the deductions including the deductions available on account of being handicapped.32. the principles with regard to the determination of the just compensation contemplated under the motor vehicles act are well settled. injuries cause a deprivation to the body which causes losses which entitle the plaintiff to claim damages. the damages may vary according to the gravity ..... acj 1022 (karnataka), held:(8) .. .if the original position cannot be restored-as indeed in personal injury or fatal accident cases it cannot obviously be-the law must endeavour to give a fair equivalent in money, so far as money can be an equivalent and so 'make good' the damage.38. in r.d. hattangadi v. pest control (india) .....

Bharat Bhushan and anr., Vs. Parvatiya GramIn Bank and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : 2008(2)ShimLC455

..... comparative merit of all eligible candidates, and selecting the best out of them.in 2000 (7) slr 651, s.v. narayana and ors. v. the kolar gramin bank (kar.), the karnataka high court was dealing with a case where the recruitment rules provided that the promotion was to be made on the basis of seniority-cum-merit. however, thereafter the management .....

High Court of Himachal Pradesh Vs. Shri Manoj Kumar Bansal and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

..... grounds judicial review on facts is also maintainable. doctrine of unreasonableness has now given way to doctrine of proportionality.47. in s. n. chandrashekar v. state of karnataka : air2006sc1204 , this court observed:33. it is now well known that the concept of error of law includes the giving of reasons that are bad in ..... respondent no. 1 was working and notes that he has spoken of a general good reputation of the delinquent. the inquiry officer then proceedsthis assessment was of controlling officer of the delinquent. his work as presiding officer might be satisfactory. there is no allegation that any complaint of any aggrieved person was made to the ..... shri manoj kumar bansal had decidedthe application without jurisdiction in order to favour shri r.s. parmar, advocate,and thereby committed grave judicial impropriety and thereby acted in a mannerhighly unbecoming of a judicial officer.84.prima-facie the delinquent had no jurisdiction togrant bail in rape case. the bail order on that .....

Dharam Pal and anr. Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : 2009(2)ShimLC208

..... of doubt will go to the petitioners. the two courts below have not considered the prosecution case properly.12. the learned additional advocate general has relied state of karnataka v. appa balu ingale and ors. : 1993crilj1029 , in support of his contention that ordinarily it is not open for the high court to interfere with the ..... he was not examined.9. pw-1 sukh dev has stated that it took about two hours to complete the proceedings on the spot and during that period traffic continued. pw-5 asi asha ram has stated that no vehicle crossed during that period and no person crossed from that place. thus, pw-1 sukh dev ..... on completion of investigation, challan was presented in the court against the petitioners for commission of offence punishable under sections 61 (1) (iii) of the punjab excise act. the petitioners were charged accordingly, they denied the charge. the prosecution has examined six witnesses and placed on record some documents. the statements of petitioners were recorded under .....

Smt. Kala Devi Vs. State of H.P. and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : (2010)ILLJ434HP,2009(2)ShimLC172

..... waged employees who were seeking parity with regularly appointed employees.12. the apex court in airfreight ltd. v. state of karnataka and ors. : (1999) 6 scc 567, has held that what the act purports to achieve is to prevent exploitation of labour and for that purpose authorizes the appropriate government to take steps to ..... to the petitioner wages in proportion to the hours of her service on rates fixed under the notification/circulars issued by the government under the minimum wages act, for such period she rendered her services with the respondent/state. the petitioner has retired. the arrears shall be disbursed within a period of three ..... casual labourers/workers temporarily employed by the contractors in connection with construction work were entitled for benefit of relevant labour and industrial laws, including minimum wages act. while dealing with the issue of maintainability of the petition under article 32 of the constitution of india with regard to enforceability of relevant labour/ .....

State of Himachal Pradesh Vs. Mast Ram

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : 2009(2)ShimLC309

..... showing that the accident happened due to causes other than negligence on his part.mr. gupta learned counsel for respondent has relied syad akbar v. state of karnataka air 1979 sc 1848 in support of his submission that principle of res ipsa loquitur is not applicable in the present case. in syad akbar, accident took ..... prosecution witnesses that particular persons were actually present at the place of accident and they had seen the accident. there is no evidence on record that a traffic constable was in fact standing at a short distance from the place of accident at the time of accident and he had actually seen the accident. therefore, ..... driving resulting in death of human beings. therefore, no benefit of probation of offenders act can be extended to the respondent. the respondent crushed arushi aged about 6 years under driver side front wheel of the bus. the persons in control of the vehicles should drive vehicles carefully, cautiously near the educational institutions and when the .....

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Kiran Enterprises and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

..... years and thereafter twenty-five per cent of the profits and gains derived from such industrial undertaking.xxx(7) notwithstanding anything contained in any other provision of this act, the profits and gains of an eligible business to which the provisions of sub-section (1) apply shall, for the purposes of determining the quantum of ..... be held to be derived from the industrial undertaking.the madras high court had placed reliance on the judgment of the karnataka high court in sterling foods v. cit : (1984) 150 itr 292. the judgment of the karnataka high court was upheld by the apex court in commissioner of income-tax v. sterling foods : (1999)237 itr ..... court after considering the legal provisions held as follows:13. before analyzing section 80-ib, as a prefatory note, it needs to be mentioned that the 1961 act broadly provides for two types of tax incentives, namely, investment linked incentives and profit linked incentives. chapter vi-a which provides for incentives in the form of .....

Reliance Infrastructure Limited Vs. State of H.P. and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

..... to scrutinise the factual basis upon which discretionary powers have been exercised. one can conveniently classify under three heads the grounds on which administrative action is subject to control by judicial review. the first ground is 'illegality', the second 'irrationality' and the third 'procedural impropriety'.the court further held as follows:65. in other ..... projects. it also held that the tender conditions could be relaxed in the given circumstances.24. in g.j. fernandez v. state of karnataka and ors. : (1990) 2 scc 488, the apex court held that if the tender conditions are interpreted consistently by the state in a particular manner ..... of contentions before us. the main contentions are that the tender conditions are required to be strictly adhered to and should not be deviated; the state should act fairly, legitimately and without any discrimination; that since the upfront premium was not paid the allotment should have been cancelled; that firm commitment of equity participation .....

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. H.P. State Cooperative Bank Ltd.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

..... of electricity. 5. shri vinay kuthiala, learned counsel for the revenue has placed reliance on the judgment of the apex court in commissioner of income-tax v. karnataka state co-operative apex bank : (2001) vol. 251 itr 194 wherein the apex court after dealing with conflicting judgments delivered by two learned judges in madhya pradesh ..... contentions of the parties, it would be appropriate to quote the relevant provisions of section 80p(2)(a)(i) of the income-tax act, 1961 (here-in-after referred to as the act, which reads as follows:80p.(1) where, in the case of an assessee being a cooperative society, the gross total income includes ..... it is registered under the h.p. cooperative societies act and is governed by the banking regulation act, 1949. the assessee in terms of the provisions of the cooperative societies act and the banking regulation act is bound to invest certain amounts in the manner prescribed under the aforesaid acts. these are known as statutory reserves (slr). the bank .....