Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: karnataka traffic control act 1960 chapter 5 miscellaneous Sorted by: old Court: karnataka Page 96 of about 2,405 results (0.239 seconds)

Sep 23 2019 (HC)

Legal Manager Vs. Smt. Nagendram Lachi

Court : Karnataka

..... not a correct law. in support of the aforesaid contention, the learned counsel has relied upon the following decisions:1. (2018) 6 scc162bharathi reddy vs. state of karnataka and others.2. air2004sc1531national insurance co.ltd. vs. swaran singh and others.13. per contra, learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of respondent owner of the tipper ..... is no any entry in the driving license for renewal of the license after 27.08.2016. witness volunteers that the driving license was in the jayanagar traffic police station and the same was collected yesterday and hence there was no any further entry.23. the evidence given by the owner of the vehicle makes ..... or otherwise of the licence held by the driver. the honble supreme court has summarized its -: -"findings as under: (i) chapter xi of the motor vehicles act, 1988 providing compulsory insurance of vehicles against third party risks is a social welfare legislation to extend relief by compensation to victims of accidents caused by use of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 25 2019 (HC)

The Deputy Commissioner And Vs. M/S S v Global Mill Limited

Court : Karnataka

..... remedy before the high court.-.: -"85. even though the high court may be one for the state, but as far as state of karnataka is concerned, there are three benches and territorial jurisdiction are assigned to the principal bench at bengaluru and the benches at dharwad and kalaburagi and ..... period of sixty days for filing of the appeal under the proviso to section 74(1) of the 2013 act, would apply. but the question is, if for any reason beyond the control of the appellant the certified copy of the award is received by the aggrieved party beyond 120 days, i ..... the reference made by the slao under section 64(1) of the right to fair compensation and transparency in land acquisition, rehabilitation and resettlement act, 2013 (2013 act for the sake of convenience) is allowed and total compensation of rs.207,75,63,348/- (rupees two --"hundred and seven crore, seventy ..... --"r in the high court of karnataka at bengaluru dated this the25h day of september, 2019 present the hon'ble mrs.justice b.v.nagarathna .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 26 2019 (HC)

Suresh Naik S/O Pedda Lakshma Naik Vs. K. Dinesh Kumar S/O Thimmappa

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... upon this court that testis is the main organ in the body which produces testosterone which deals with the libido behavioral traits and also the control center of the body with reference to production of hypothalamus. the 11 report would indicate that the testosterone which is an important male hormone ..... file of m.a.c.t, ballari has come up in this appeal seeking enhancement of compensation awarded for the injuries suffered in a road traffic accident dated 22.12.2010. 3 2. the records would disclose that on 22.12.2010 when the claimant was traveling on a bicycle ..... (by smt.aruna deshpande, advocate for r.2) (notice to r1-served) this miscellaneous first appeal is filed under section1731) of the motor vehicles act, 1988 against the judgment and award dated2305.2012, passed in mvc.no.1346/2011 on the file of the member, motor accident claims tribunal-ii, ..... in the high co urt o f karnataka dharwad bench dated this the26t h day of september, 2019 present the honble mr.justice s.n. satyanarayana and .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 22 2019 (HC)

Basavaraj Kallappa Kugati Vs. The Joint Registrar Of

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... co-operative bank in the name of kittur taluka prathamika sahakari krishi mattu grameena abhivrudhi bank. under the provisions of the karnataka co-operative societies act (for short the act), the primary co-operative banks are called primary co-operative agricultural rural development bank, which in common parlance are known as ..... registrar. consequently, the registering authority was directed to reconsider the application and complete the registration formalities.3. in terms of rule 3 of the karnataka co- operative societies rule, 1960 (for short rules) the 1st petitioner was appointed as chief promoter granting permission to collect shares from persons who ..... a proposed member as promoter. this is in keeping with the objective of the enactment which endeavours to promote voluntary formation, autonomous functioning, democratic control and professional management of co-operative societies. 25 what follows is that the registering authority prepares a list of pre-registration members, as per .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 28 2019 (HC)

Vijayakumar Rai Vs. The State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... 44240-327 of 2013 for seeking various reliefs. the first petitioner is an association of the judicial officers in the state. it is registered under the karnataka societies registration act, 1960. the first relief claimed is for issuing a writ of mandamus seeking a direction against the respondents to clarify that the notification g.o. ..... review petition, an argument was that the power to regulate the conditions of service of the judicial officers vests with the executive which is subject to legislative control. reliance was placed by the review petitioners on article 309 of the 1 (1992) 1 scc1192 (1993) 4 scc288 constitution of india by pointing out ..... w/o prasanna m thamankar aged34years civil judge and jmfc mysore-532101 43. lavanya h.n. w/o siddesh aged32years civil judge and jmfc metropolitan magistrate traffic court6bangalore city-560001 44. prathibha bandurao kulakarni w/o pramod kulkarni aged38years civil judge and jmfc gulbarga district-585321 45. kumara s s/o somayya aged36years addl .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 06 2019 (HC)

M/S T T K Prestige Ltd Vs. The Union of India Reptd by Its Finance Sec ...

Court : Karnataka

..... indian income tax act1961in so far as it purports to levy a tax called the fringe benefit tax under the provisions of the act and etc. in w.p.no.27087/2005between : 1.2. karnataka drugs and pharmaceuticals manufacturers association registered no.394/98-99 3b, bharath deluxe apartment441, a & b, fair field layout race course ..... that authority for a court to vacate or repeal a statute on that ground alone. but it is only in express constitutional provisions limiting legislative power and controlling the temporary will of a majority by a permanent and paramount law, settled by the deliberate wisdom of the nation that one can find a safe and ..... appearances to discover the true character and nature of the legislation2:-dwarkadas shrinivas v. the sholapur spinning and weaving company ltd., air1954sc119at p.123. in state of karnataka v. m/s. hansa corporation reported in air1981sc463at pp 469-470, the supreme court observed as under: there is always a presumption of constitutionality of a statute .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 20 2019 (HC)

Sri Vishwanath H M Vs. Government of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... persons as the state government may, having regard to their economic backwardness, by notification, specify.3. under the provisions of section 7(2) of the karnataka municipal corporations act, seats shall be reserved in a corporation:-"(a) (b) for the scheduled castes; and for the scheduled tribes. and the number of seats so ..... remains is how far the redistribution should be accomplished. according to learned author, this could be achieved, not only by taxation but also by regulatory control of private transactions. he accepts that distributive fairness can only be achieved by taxation or contractual regulation, at some sacrifice in individual liberty.83. the division ..... be had to various decisions which led to expansion and development of the law. the principle of constitutionalism is now a legal principle which requires control over exercise of governmental power to ensure that it does not destroy the democratic principle upon which it is based. these democratic principles include the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 17 2020 (HC)

Sri K. Lenin Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... late sri l.karupannan r/o old no.94, odaikadu veppampoondi village gengavalli tk, salem dt, tamil nadu-636 101. petitioner (by sri ashwin vaish, advocate) and :1. state of karnataka by superintendent of police special enquiries, cid, carlton house, no.1, palace road bengaluru-560 001 2. swamy nithyananda @ rajashekaran nithyananda dhyanapeeta kallugopahalli village bidadi hobli, ramanagar district ..... , then under such circumstances, he must come forward and give the evidence as contemplated under the law. without doing the same, he has acted on his own way that he is leading the court instead of court controlling the case and proceeding with the matter. in that light, the trial court shall proceed with the case by keeping in view the ratio .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 18 2020 (HC)

The Branch Manager Vs. Devikamma @ Devakemma W/O Laxman Karenavar

Court : Karnataka Kalaburagi

..... no.1 was travelling in the offending vehicle as a passenger being a member of the marriage party and not as a owner to supervise and control the bus. since the respondent no.1 was a passenger in a public service vehicle, may be owned by him, which met with an ..... to the above appeals are as follows; the claimants are the mother, wife and children of the deceased gangappa who died in a road traffic accident that occurred on 10.05.2009. in the claim petition it was contended that the deceased gangappa was the owner of the auto bearing ..... order to contend that since the offending vehicle was a public service vehicle within the meaning of section 2 (35) of the motor vehicles act, 1988 (for short the act), notwithstanding the fact that the deceased gangappa was the owner of the vehicle, since the vehicle was taken on hire and engaged by gangappas ..... 1 r in the high court of karnataka kalaburagi bench dated this the18h day of february2020before the honble mr. justice s.r.krishna kumar mfa no.31002/2010 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 28 2020 (HC)

M A Murthy Vs. Karnataka State Financial Corporation

Court : Karnataka

..... ) dated 29.10.2002 is binding on the respondent-corporation and the regulation 22 is required to be interpreted in a manner, in consonance 21 with rule 3 of karnataka government service (seniority) rules, 1957 in the absence of any contra material. consequently it is held that in the matter of fixation of seniority inter-se between direct ..... the said contention is per-se false and it is falsified by no less a communication emanating from the office of the secretary to government, finance department, government of karnataka dated 29.10.2002, and addressed to the managing director. it is even more relevant to note that the clarification was issued on the request of the first respondent ..... protested. the apex court has further examined the issue, in the light of the provisions of section 25, with 32 regard to control of the government, which is akin to the provisions of section 39 (1) of the act.25. the hon'ble apex court was pleased to hold as below in paragraphs 19, 20 & 24."19. the court is .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //